Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) reveals key genes involved in pistil deletion

Hereditas volume 157, Article number: 39 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The growth process of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) includes vegetative growth and reproductive growth. The reproductive growth period is relatively long (approximately 1.5 years), during which a large number of nutrients are consumed, resulting in reduced tea yield and quality, accelerated aging, and shortened economic life of the tea plant. The formation of unisexual and sterile flowers can weaken the reproductive growth process of the tea plant. To further clarify the molecular mechanisms of pistil deletion in the tea plant, we investigated the transcriptome profiles in the pistil-deficient tea plant (CRQS), wild tea plant (WT), and cultivated tea plant (CT) by using RNA-Seq.

Results

A total of 3683 differentially expressed genes were observed between CRQS and WT flower buds, with 2064 upregulated and 1619 downregulated in the CRQS flower buds. These genes were mainly involved in the regulation of molecular function and biological processes. Ethylene synthesis–related ACC synthase genes were significantly upregulated and ACC oxidase genes were significantly downregulated. Further analysis revealed that one of the WIP transcription factors involved in ethylene synthesis was significantly upregulated. Moreover, AP1 and STK, genes related to flower development, were significantly upregulated and downregulated, respectively.

Conclusions

The transcriptome analysis indicated that the formation of flower buds with pistil deletion is a complex biological process. Our study identified ethylene synthesis, transcription factor WIP, and A and D-class genes, which warrant further investigation to understand the cause of pistil deletion in flower bud formation.

Introduction

Tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze], originating from the southwest region of China [1], is a crucial perennial evergreen leafy plant and economically valuable woody crop. The tender shoots are harvested from cultivated tea plants, and the flourishing growth of branches and leaves of the tea plant are the prerequisites for high yield and stable production of tea gardens [2]. Therefore, flower bud differentiation to tea fruit maturation requires 1.5 years, during which time, the plant consumes large quantities of nutrients, resulting in a decline in tea yield and quality, and accelerated aging of the tea plant [3, 4]. The research on tea flowers mainly focused on hybridization and incompatibility in the tea plant [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, the research on unisexual flowers and parthenogenesis of tea plant are very little. The current study demonstrated that the formation of unisexual flowers in the tea plant could effectively reduce their reproductive growth [4]. Therefore, studying the flower development mechanism could reveal new information for regulating the sex determination of the tea plant and other species.

The sex differences between flowering plants are mainly related to flower organs [12, 13]. Therefore, the genes associated with flower development may be involved in the sex differentiation process. According to the ABCDE model of flower development, genes of the B + C + E class regulate stamen development, those of the C + E class regulate carpel development, and those of the D class regulate ovule development [14,15,16,17]. The genes of the B, C, D, and E classes synergistically regulate the development of stamens, carpels, and ovules [18]. The vast majority of functional genes involved in the ABCDE model belong to the MADS-box gene family, which indicates that this gene family regulates flower sex differentiation [14, 16, 19]. For example, weak mutants and RANi strain of the AG gene cause carpel development to be deficient and the flower meristem to lose certainty; however, the development of the stamen is almost unaffected [20, 21].

Furthermore, various plant hormones are involved in the sex determination of plants [22, 23]. Among them, the gaseous hormone ethylene plays a large role [24,25,26]. Methionine adenosyltransferase, ACC synthase (ACS), and ACC oxidase (ACO) are the enzymes required for ethylene biosynthesis, of which ACS and ACO are key enzymes for ethylene synthesis [27,28,29]. Studies have indicated that high endogenous ethylene concentrations and elevated expressions of the CsACS1 [30], CsACS2 [31], CsACS11 [32], CmACS7 [33], CmACS11 [34], and CsACO2 [35] genes are associated with the formation of female flowers in cucumbers (Cs) and melons (Cm). In melons, CmWIP1, a C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor gene, indirectly downregulates the expression of CmACS7, thereby promoting the formation of male flowers. Furthermore, a loss-of-function mutation in the CmWIP1 gene induces the formation of gynoecious plants [34]. The ortholog CsWIP1 of CmWIP1 can bind to the promoter of CsACO2 and suppress its expression, thereby regulating the development of unisexual flowers in cucumbers [35]; ClWIP1 was determined to be involved in the sex determination of watermelons [36].

The tea plant, similar to most angiosperms, has bisexual flowers. Distinguishing the sex of the tea plant with bisexual flowers is impossible, which limits the study of sex determination of the tea plant. In the early stages of 2016, our research group identified a natural pistil-deficient tea plant (CRQS) [37]. The flowers of CRQS were unisexual (male) and did not exhibit styles or ovaries [37]. The characteristics of CRQS provide valuable insights for further study of pistil deletion and sex determination in the tea plant. To determine the molecular mechanism of pistil deletion in tea plants, we profiled high-throughput RNA-Seq analysis of the flower buds of the CRQS, wild tea plant (WT), and cultivated tea plant (CT) to investigate the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Furthermore, DEG expression was verified using real-time PCR, to clarify the key genes promoting CRQS pistil deletion. Our results provide a foundation for future studies on the sex determination of the tea plant and contribute to the selection of pistil-deficient tea plant varieties.

Methods

Plant materials

CRQS (C. sinensis vs. assamica), WT (C. taliensis), and CT (C. sinensis vs. assamica) were grown in the national germplasm repository of large-leaf tea (Menghai) of the Tea Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. A rare tea plant with pistil deletion, CRQS, with a natural unisexual flowers mutant was discovered [37]. The flower buds were separately collected from three tea plants on May 20, 2018. All the samples (flower buds) were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C until further use. Three biological replicates were performed for all the experiments.

cDNA library construction and sequencing

Total RNAs of the collected flower buds were extracted using previously described methods [38]. After preparation, the quality and quantity of RNA were measured using the Nanodrop 2500 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. The total RNAs of the samples were used to construct the RNA-Seq libraries. The cDNA libraries were constructed and transcriptome sequenced by Beijing Novogene Technology (Beijing, China) using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Chen et al. described the procedure in further detail [38].

Genome alignment and gene annotation

The original image data files of the samples obtained from the Illumina HiSeq 2500 were converted to raw sequence reads through base calling analysis. The raw reads were filtered by removing adapter sequences and low-quality reads, and the raw sequence reads were converted to clean reads. The Hierarchical Indexing for Spliced Alignment of Transcripts (HISAT2) program was used to map the remaining reads to the tea reference genome (http://www.plantkingdomgdb.com/tea_tree/). Newly discovered genes that were not annotated in the reference genome were annotated using publicly available databases according to the methods described by Ma et al. [5]. The transcriptome data of this study was stored in the NCBI SRA database (SRA accession: PRJNA637178).

Identification of DEGs

Transcript levels were calculated in fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). The DEGs between the two samples were defined as those exhibiting at least two-fold change in transcript abundance (|log2 (fold change)| ≥ 1), with P < 0.05 relative to a control, as obtained using the DESeq2 tool. Furthermore, at least one of the three samples had an FPKM > 1. The P values were adjusted using the Benjamin and Hochberg’s approach for controlling the false discovery rate [39].

Functional annotation of transcripts

The nonredundant transcripts were annotated based on the following databases: Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins, euKaryotic Ortholog Groups, NCBI nonredundant protein sequences, homologous protein family, Gene Ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). A GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs was performed using the GOseq R package [40], and enriched pathways of DEGs were identified using KEGG Orthology Based Annotation System software.

Quantitative real-time PCR verification

The first-strand cDNA was synthesized from 200 ng of total RNA using the FastKing gDNA Dispelling RT SuperMix (TIANGEN BIOTECH, China) according to the instruction manual. The transcripts or gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR were designed with Primer Premier 5 software and synthesized using Sangon Biotech (Shanghai China). A qRT-PCR was performed using the KAPA SYBR® FAST qPCR Master Mi (2×) Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, USA). The qPCR reactions were performed using the qTOWER 2.2 Real-time PCR System with the KAPA SYBR® FAST qPCR Master Mix (2×) Kit (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, USA). GAPDH (XM_028237220.1) from the tea plants was selected as a reference gene, and the relative expression level of each gene was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCT method [41]. All qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate, and the average Ct values were calculated. The primers used in this study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used for qRT-PCR verification
Full size table

Results

Morphological characteristics of pistil-deficient flower buds

Flowers are the reproductive organs of the tea plant. The tea plant floral organ is a complete bisexual (perfect) flower composed of a pistil, stamens, petals, and calyxes. Our research group discovered a specific tea germplasm (CQRS) in the national tea germplasm repository of large-leaf tea (Menghai), which lacked the pistil and formed unisexual flowers (male flower; Fig. 1a). Except for the absence of pistils (stigma, style, and ovary), no significant differences in the stamens, morphology, and pollen fertility were observed between the pistil-deficient and normal flower buds (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Morphological characteristics of the tea plant flower. (a) Morphologies of CRQS (pistil-deficient) and normal (bisexual) flowers. (b) Morphologies of the CRQS and normal floral organ

Full size image

Sequencing and de novo assembly of transcriptome data

The total RNA from three tea plant flower samples was used for RNA-Seq with three replicates of each individual. After low-quality reads and adapter sequences were removed, the three cDNA libraries were subjected to pair-end reading on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Therefore, 58,150,274 clean reads remained (Table 2). The GC content of the clean data was above 43%, and the quality score (Q30) percentage was above 92% (Table 2). The ratios of mapped reads were 82.83–83.22% (CRQS), 79.98–80.48% (WT), and 82.34–82.96% (CT; Table 2). A total of 51,071 genes were obtained through comparison and analysis with the genome, among which 14,120 were new genes (Table S1).

Table 2 Summary dataset of transcriptome assembly
Full size table

DEGs and functional characterization

To understand the difference in gene expression between pistil-deficient flowers (unisexual/male) and bisexual flowers, we measured the level of transcription of FPKM from RNA-Seq data. Genes were categorized as DEGs if they exhibited at least a 2-fold change (|log2 (fold change)| ≥ 1) in transcript abundance (p < 0.05) by using R package DESeq2. A total of 44,503 DEGs were detected in CRQS (Fig. 2), WT, and CT. Between CRQS and WT, 16,000 DEGs were screened out (Fig. 2a, b). The number of DEGs was 12,118 between CRQS and CT and 16,385 between WT and CT. In total, 3683 DEGs (Table S2) that differed from WT and CT were screened out in CRQS, with upregulated and downregulated expressions in 2064 and 1619 genes, respectively (Fig. 2a, b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cluster analysis of DEGs. (a) The numbers of downregulated and upregulated DEGs. (b) A Venn diagram illustrating the number of DEGs in CRQS vs WT, CRQS vs CT, and WT vs CT. (c) Heat map demonstrating the expression of the DEGs. High-expression genes are denoted in red, whereas low expression genes are denoted in blue on the heat map. The change in expression levels is illustrated after log10 conversion

Full size image

The unique DEGs were characterized using the GO and KEGG databases. The major distribution of GO enrichment analysis was listed in Fig. 3 based on the Blast2GO software analysis. In total, 1825 genes were successfully annotated into 2285 terms within three main categories: cellular component (284), molecular function (719), and biological process (1282). The membrane, cell part, and cell accounted for a major proportion of the cellular component category. Binding and catalytic activity were the predominant genetic functions of the molecular function category. Most genes in the biological process category were involved in the metabolic and cellular processes. Moreover, the “hormone metabolic process”, “response to the hormone”, “regulation of hormone levels”, “reproduction”, and “reproductive process” were enriched in 2, 3, 2, 14, and 17 unigenes, respectively. The distribution of the KEGG pathway annotations for differential genes is illustrated in Fig. 4. A total of 118 KEGG pathways were identified and the majority were “galactose metabolism”, “proteasome”, “pyruvate metabolism”, “biosynthesis of secondary metabolites”, “biosynthesis of amino acids”, and “plant–pathogen interaction”.

Fig. 3
figure 3

GO annotation classification statistics of the differential expression transcripts. Blue indicates molecular function, and yellow indicates biological process. According to the p-value from small to large, the first 30 components are displayed

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

KEGG pathway classification statistics of the differential expression transcripts. According to the p-value from small to large, the first 20 components are displayed

Full size image

Identification of ABCDE model related genes involved in DEGs

The ABCDE model is widely accepted for explaining the development of floral organs. In this model, all genes belong to the MADS-box transcription factor family except the AP2 gene. Three AP2 (CSA009488, Novel05812, and Novel10689) and five MADS-box (CSA016398, Novel01833, Novel05521, CSA014619, and CSA003190) genes were screened in 3683 DEGs (Table 3). Within the AP2 genes, CSA009488 exhibited a downregulated expression, whereas Novel05812 and Novel10689 genes exhibited an upregulated expression. Annotation information and comparison results revealed that CSA016398 (AGL29) and Novel01833 (AGL62) belonged to the Mα Group, Novel05521 (AGL65) belonged to the Mδ Group, and CSA014619 (CAULIFLOWER A-like, CAL) and CSA003190 (AGL11, STK) belonged to the MIKC group. Notably, only CSA003190 was downregulated, and the other four AGAMOUS-like genes (CSA014619, CSA016398, Novel01833, and Novel05521) were upregulated (Table 3).

Table 3 DEGs related to tea flowers with pistil deletion
Full size table

Identification of ethylene-related genes involved in DEGs

Studies have reported that ethylene is involved in the sex determination of various plants. We identified multiple genes related to ethylene synthesis, regulation, and signaling, such as two ACC synthetases (CSA026751 and Novel05490), four ACOs (Novel02945, Novel10788, CSA010549, and Novel11742), one ERF transcription factor (Novel00816), and one WIP family transcription factor (CSA026801), by analyzing the DEGs (Table 3). The RNA-Seq results revealed that ACS genes were upregulated, whereas ACO genes were downregulated, except for CSA010549, which was upregulated. The transcription factor genes Novel00816 and CSA026801 were both upregulated (Table 3).

qPCR analysis of DEGs

To confirm RNA-Seq data, we designed primers for the 16 identified genes and performed qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 5). The primers were designed multiple times based on the gene sequences of Novel10788 and Novel10689; however, their expression levels remained undetected. The qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression trends of most DEGs were consistent with transcriptome data (85.71%), except for the findings regarding Novel11742 and CSA010549 (14.29%). Thus, the credibility and reliability of RNA-Seq data were corroborated.

Fig. 5
figure 5

qPCR analysis of selected DEGs. Data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3 independent experiments. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01 (CRQS was compared with WT and CT)

Full size image

Discussion

The tender shoots are the most economically valuable organs of the tea plant; however, during the 1.5-year reproductive growth period, the plant consumes large amounts of nutrients, which leads to a reduction in tea yield and quality and acceleration of plant aging, which in turn leads to a reduced economic life [3, 4]. The formation of unisexual or sterile flowers in tea plants effectively weakens the plant’s reproductive growth, which can make the plant more economically valuable. A natural unisexual tea plant mutant with no pistil was identified in the national germplasm repository of large-leaf tea (Menghai) [37]. This tea plant could not bear fruit because of the lack of pistil, and thus the reproductive growth was limited. The limited reproductive growth engendered the accumulation of nutrients, which promoted the growth of buds and leaves. The study of pistil-deficient tea plants clarified the mechanism of pistil-deficient and unisexual flower formation, which could enable the cultivation of nonfruitful tea plants and improve tea plant varieties. We studied the differences in the transcriptional expression profiles of pistil-deficient, cultivated, and wild tea plant flowers. A total of 3683 genes were screened from the three cDNA libraries, which are the different expressions in pistil-deficient tea plant flowers (Fig. 2). Moreover, enriched genes in 2285 GO terms and 118 KEGG pathways demonstrated the complexity of DEG function (Figs. 3 and 4).

Role of ABCDE model–related genes expressed in pistil-deficient tea plant flowers

The ABCDE model can be used to further clarify the molecular mechanism of plant flower organ development [14,15,16,17,18]. Except for the A-class functional gene AP2, all genes related to the ABCDE model belong to the MIKC group of the MADS-box family. In Arabidopsis, the MADS-box family can be divided into five groups (Mα, Mβ, Mγ, Mδ, and MIKC) in addition to AGL33 [14, 16, 19, 42]. Therefore, the genes from the MIKC group play a crucial role in regulating plant flowering time, flower organ formation, and vegetative growth [42]. In this study, five MADS-box genes were identified from DEGs; among them, CSA014619 (CAULIFLOWER A-like, CAL) and CSA003190 (AGL11, STK) belonged to the MIKC group, and the other three genes belonged to other groups (Tables 3 and 4).

Among the DEGs belonging to the MICK group, CAL was primarily involved in the formation of the flower meristems and is not reported to be involved in pistil development. Studies have demonstrated that C, D, and E functional genes determine ovule development [14,15,16,17]. Furthermore, CSA014619 was upregulated in transcriptome data but the qRT-PCR analysis results did not reveal a significant difference, which indicates that CAL may not be involved in pistil deletion in CRQS. CRQS varieties cannot develop ovules because of the lack of ovaries. CSA003190 (STK) belongs to class D of functional genes. The transcriptome data and qRT-PCR results indicated that CSA003190 in the pistil-deficient tea plant was extremely downregulated (Tables 3 and 4), which may be the reason why ovules were not form. This finding indicates that CSA003190 may be involved in pistil deletion in CRQS.

The ABCDE model indicates that 2C + 2E quartet proteins determine carpel development [14]. In this study, no C and E functional genes were screened from DEGs. However, three A-type genes (CSA009488, Novel05812, and Novel10689) were identified. Studies have indicated that functional genes of classes A and C are antagonistic in action [43]. We determined that Novel05812 was significantly upregulated (Tables 3 and 4). No changes in functional genes of class C were detected from the transcriptome data despite the upregulation of the class A functional gene Novel05812. The upregulation of class A functional genes may affect the formation of tea plant pistils in other manners.

Role of ethylene-related genes in flower formation in pistil-deficient tea plant

Studies have demonstrated that ethylene affects pistil development in plants [23, 31, 32]. High concentrations of ethylene are conducive to the formation of female flowers, whereas low concentrations result in the formation of male flowers. The biosynthesis of ethylene involves two key enzymes, ACS and ACO. ACS catalyzes the conversion of SAM to 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ester (ACC), and ACC is oxidized by ACO to form ethylene [27,28,29]. Numerous ACSs and ACOs are closely related to female flower formation in cucumbers and melons [30,31,32,33,34,35]. In this study, two ACS and four ACO genes were screened from DEGs (Tables 3 and Fig. 5). The two ACS genes were significantly upregulated as evidenced by both the transcriptome and quantitative results, but the downstream ACO gene was not upregulated. Notably, Novel02945 (ACO4-like) was significantly downregulated.

Studies have indicated that CsWIP1 can directly bind to the promoter of CsACO2 and inhibit its expression in cucumber plants, which affects the parthenocarpic composition [35]. Similar mechanisms have been observed in melons [34] and watermelons [36]. In the present study, the WIP transcription factor CSA026801 was also identified in DEGs. Both transcriptome data and quantitative results indicated that CSA02680 was significantly upregulated (Tables 3 and Fig. 5). These findings indicated that there may be a sex-regulating mechanism in tea plants similar to the one in cucumbers, whereby WIP inhibits the expression of ACO and forms unisexual flowers (male flowers). However, the ethylene signal response may differ from the conventional ethylene signal transmission.

Conclusion

This study provides a comparative transcriptomic analysis of differences in gene expression in pistil-deficient and normal flower buds.

A molecular model of pistil deletion (male flower) in the tea plant is summarized in Fig. 6. ABCDE-class functional genes A and D may be involved in pistil deletion, with a class A functional gene (Novel05812) being upregulated and a class D gene (CSA003190) being downregulated, thereby inhibiting or promoting other genes and inducing pistil deletion. Furthermore, WIP3 (CSA026801) may inhibit the formation of the pistils in tea plants by downregulating the expression of ACO4-like (Novel02945) gene, leading to unisexual flowers. Overall, a large number of A-class, D-class, WIP transcription factors, and ACO genes are now identified as promising targets for further investigation and future breeding of sterile tea plant varieties.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Putative gene regulatory network of pistil deletion in tea plants. The arrows (green or yellow) indicate the expression patterns of key genes in pistil-deficient tea flowers; upward arrows indicate upregulated expression and downward arrows indicate downregulated expression

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

We have provided detailed information about the materials and methods in our manuscript.

Abbreviations

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

CRQS:

Pistil-deficient tea plan

WT:

Wild tea plant

CT:

Cultivated tea plant

ACS:

ACC synthase

ACO:

ACC oxidase

References

  1. Chen L, Yu FL, Tong QQ. Discussions on phylogenetic classification and evolution of sect. Thea. J Tea Sci. 2000;20(2):89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li M, Chen LB, Tian YP, et al. Digital gene expression analysis of tea flowers without pistil at three development stages. J Tea Sci. 2017;37(1):97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xia CH, Shu JL. Chemical flowers removing and increase tea production in tea plant. Zhiwu Zazhi. 1979;2:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang YH. Analyses the way of control reproductive growth in tea plant. China Tea. 1997;4:6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ma QP, Chen CS, Zeng ZP, et al. Transcriptomic analysis between self- and cross-pollinated pistils of tea plants (Camellia sinensis). BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):289.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang CY, Wang LY, Wei K, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals self-incompatibility in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) might be under gametophytic control. BMC Genomics. 2016;17:359.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, et al. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(19):3787–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen X, Hao S, Wang L, et al. Late-acting self-incompatibility in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Biologia. 2012;67(2):347–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Liu T, Hao S, et al. Differential gene expression analysis of self-incompatible lines in tea by cDNA-AFLP. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(53):10906–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang YH, Li XC, Zhu-Ge Q, et al. Nitric oxide participates in cold-inhibited Camellia sinensis pollen germination and tube growth partly via cGMP in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52436.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou QQ, Li H, Hang TX. Genetic diversity and relationship of dongting biluochun tea germplasm in Suzhou related SSR markers. Pak J Bot. 2019;51(3):895–902.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett SC, Hough J. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(1):67–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bai SN, Xu ZH. Unisexual cucumber flowers, sex and sex differentiation. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2013;304:1–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan HY, Hu Y, Tudor M, et al. Specific interactions between the K domains of AG and AGLs, members of the MADS domain family of DNA binding proteins. Plant J. 1997;12(5):999–1010.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma H, Deamphilis C. The ABCs of floral evolution. Cell. 2000;101(1):5–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Theißen G. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001;4(1):75–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Krizek BA, Fletcher JC. Molecular mechanisms of flower development: an armchair guide. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(9):688–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soltis DE, Ma H, Frohlich MW, et al. The floral genome: an evolutionary history of gene duplication and shifting patterns of gene expression. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(8):358–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Immink RGH, Ferrario S, Busscher-Lange J, et al. Analysis of the petunia MADS-box transcription factor family. Mol Gen Genomics. 2003;268(5):598–606.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sieburth LE, Running MP, Meyerowitz EM. Genetic separation of third and fourth whorl functions of AGAMOUS. Plant Cell. 1995;7(8):1249–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pan IL, McQuinn R, Giovannoni JJ, et al. Functional diversification of AGAMOUS lineage genes in regulating tomato flower and fruit development. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(6):1795–806.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Golenberg EM, West NW. Hormonal interactions and gene regulation can link monoecy and environmental plasticity to the evolution of dioecy in plants. Am J Bot. 2013;100(6):1022–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Manzano S, Martínez C, Megías Z, et al. The role of ethylene and brassinosteroids in the control of sex expression and flower development in Cucurbita pepo. Plant Growth Regul. 2011;65:213–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudich J. Increase in femaleness of three cucurbits by treatment with ethrel, an ethylene-releasing compound. Planta. 1969;86:69–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li DD, Sheng YY, Niu HH, et al. Gene interactions regulating sex determination in cucurbits. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1231.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng GQ, Sanderson BJ, Keefover-Ring K, et al. Pathways to sex determination in plants: how many roads lead to Rome? Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020;54:61–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Adams DO, Yang SF. Ethylene biosynthesis: identification of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid as an intermediate in the conversion of methionine to ethylene. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1979;76(1):170–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kende H. Ethylene biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1993;44:283–307.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang SF, Hoffman NE. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Re Plant Physiol. 1984;35(1):155–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Knopf RR, Trebitsh T. The female-specific Cs-ACS1G gene of cucumber. A case of gene duplication and recombination between the non-sex-specific 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene and a branched-chain amino acid transaminase gene. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47(9):1217–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Saito S, Fujii N, Miyazawa Y, et al. Correlation between development of female flower buds and expression of the CS-ACS2 gene in cucumber plants. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(11):2897–907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Boualem A, Troadec C, Camps C, et al. A cucurbit androecy gene reveals how unisexual flowers develop and dioecy emerges. Science. 2015;350(6261):688–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boualem A, Fergany M, Fernandez R, et al. A conserved mutation in an ethylene biosynthesis enzyme leads to andromonoecy in melons. Science. 2008;321(5890):836–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Martin A, Troadec C, Boualem A, et al. A transposon-induced epigenetic change leads to sex determination in melon. Nature. 2009;461(22):1135–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen HM, Sun JJ, Li S, et al. An ACC oxidase gene essential for Cucumber Carpel development. Mol Plant. 2016;9(9):1315–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Guo SG, Ji GJ, et al. A unique chromosome translocation disrupting ClWIP1 leads to gynoecy in watermelon. Plant J. 2020;101(2):265–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Song WX, Chen LB, Li YY, et al. Primary study of agronomic traits and quality characteristics from tea flower with the deletion of pistil. Hubei Agric Sci. 2016;55(9):2269–71.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen LB, Qu H, Xia LF, et al. Transcriptome profiling of the fertile parent and sterile hybrid in tea plant flower buds. Hereditas. 2019;156:12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(3):368–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, et al. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Parenicová L, de Folter S, Kieffer M, et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: new openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell. 2003;15(7):1538–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao L, Kim YJ, Dinh TT, et al. Mir172 regulates stem cell fate and defines the inner boundary of APETALA3 and PISTILLATA expression domain in Arabidopsis floral meristems. Plant J. 2007;51(5):840–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD1001601), China Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-19) and State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization (SKLTOF20150105).

Funding

This work was funded by 2019YFD1001601, CARS-19, and SKLTOF20150105.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yufei Liu and Dandan Pang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tea Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Menghai, 666201, China

    Yufei Liu, Dandan Pang, Yiping Tian, Youyong Li, Huibing Jiang, Yunnan Sun, Lifei Xia & Linbo Chen

  2. Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Tea Science, Menghai, 666201, China

    Yufei Liu, Dandan Pang, Yiping Tian, Youyong Li, Huibing Jiang, Yunnan Sun, Lifei Xia & Linbo Chen

Authors
  1. Yufei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dandan Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiping Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Youyong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huibing Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yunnan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lifei Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Linbo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YL, DP, LX and LC conceived and designed the experiments. YL, DP, YT, YL, HJ and YS performed the experiments. YL and DP analyzed the data. YL and DP wrote the paper. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lifei Xia or Linbo Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1 :

Table S1. Basic annotation information for 14,120 new genes.

Additional file 2 :

Table S2. Basic information of differentially expressed genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Pang, D., Tian, Y. et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) reveals key genes involved in pistil deletion. Hereditas 157, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-020-00153-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-020-00153-x

Keywords

Hereditas

ISSN: 1601-5223

Contact us