Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research
  • Open Access

First report of bicolour FISH of Berberis diaphana and B. soulieana reveals interspecific differences and co-localization of (AGGGTTT)3 and rDNA 5S in B. diaphana

Hereditas2019156:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-019-0088-6

  • Received: 20 October 2018
  • Accepted: 9 April 2019
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Berberis consists of approximately 500 species and is the largest genus in Berberidaceae. Most Berberis species lack cytological data, and bicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has never been performed on Berberis. In this work, a karyotype of Berberis diaphana, an alpine Berberis species obtained from an altitude of 3600 m in Wolong National Nature Reserve, China, was analysed and compared with Berberis soulieana Schneid. via FISH using oligonucleotide telomere probes for (AGGGTTT)3 and 5S rDNA (41 bp) for the first time.

Results

Berberis diaphana belonged to cytotype 2A and had the karyotype formula 2n = 2x = 28 = 26 m + 2 sm (2SAT). The mitotic metaphase chromosome lengths ranged from 1.82 ± 0.04 μm to 2.75 ± 0.00 μm. Clear (AGGGTTT)3 signals were detected at two telomeres in every chromosome and were co–localized with 5S rDNA at the terminal regions of the long arms in the 6th pair of chromosomes. One pair of (AGGGTTT)3 sites was localized in the satellites of the 7th pair of chromosomes, which are the only submetacentric chromosomes in this species. Totally 28 chromosomes with one pair of satellited chromosomes were observed in B. soulieana. This species had four 5S rDNA signals with two weak signals at the end of long arms in the 5th pair of chromosomes and another two strong signals detected in the interstitial region close to the end of short arms in the 6th pair of chromosomes. Each large signal consisted of two smaller signals with secondary constrictions around them.

Conclusions

FISH physical mapping of B. diaphana suggested that (AGGGTTT)3 and rDNA 5S co-localize at the 6th pair of chromosomes. The density, location and number difference of 5S rDNA loci indicated structural differences among the chromosomes between B. diaphana and B. soulieana. Our results provide information that may contribute to future studies on the physical assembly of the Berberis genome and the evolution of rDNA and telomere FISH patterns in Berberis.

Keywords

  • (AGGGTTT)3
  • 5S rDNA
  • FISH
  • Karyotype
  • Berberis diaphana

Background

Berberis L. is the largest genus in Berberidaceae and consists of approximately 500 species of evergreen or deciduous simple-leaved shrubs [1, 2]. Many species of this genus are grown as ornamental shrubs and used for medicinal purposes. The whole Berberis diaphana Maxim. plant contains berberine [3], which demonstrates anti–neoplastic activities and is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes [4, 5]. This genus is widely distributed in the temperate and subtropical regions of Asia, Europe, Africa, and North and South America [1] along altitudes ranging from lower than 1000 m to higher than 3000 m [2, 6, 7]. The distribution area has mean annual precipitation ranging from less than 200 to more than 3500 mm [8], thus reflecting the high diversity of their habitats. The stem, leaf, flower, and fruit morphologies of Berberis species also demonstrate high diversity [1]. In addition to traditional taxonomy, some molecular studies have been conducted to clarify the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of Berberis species [912]. However, the possible relationship between the cytogenetic characters and the high diversity of Berberis remains uncertain.

Karyotypes have provided many clues for unravelling evolutionary and taxonomic decisions [13]. Chromosome number has been employed in taxometric and cladistic analyses of Berberidaceae and Berberis [14, 15]. Wang et al. [15] proposed that Berberidaceae should be divided into three subfamilies (Podophylloideae, Nandinoideae and Berberidoideae) according to the results of chromosome number data, molecular sequence analyses and traditional taxonomic conclusions. Berberidoideae contains Berberis, Mahonia Nutt and Ranzania T. Ito and is the largest subfamily of Berberidaceae. Only three types of chromosome numbers have been observed worldwide in Berberis, namely, diploids (2n = 28) [6, 7, 1618], a few tetraploids (2n = 56) [8, 19] and 2n = 28, 42 in Berberis amurensis Rupr. [2]. However, the detailed karyotypes of Berberis species have rarely been studied.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to establish detailed karyotypes to reveal inter- and intra-species discrepancies. (TTTAGGG)n originally isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana is the telomere sequence for most angiosperms [20]. Lin et al. [21] reported that telomere probes can detect recent centric fusions on muntjacs. 5S rDNA oligonucleotides have been used to identify diversity in the chromosomes of Piptanthus concolor [22], and it has also been used to study the genome evolution of another genus of Berberidaceae, Epimedium L [23]. Although 45S rDNA FISH has been performed in Berberis thunbergii DC [24], thus far, bicolour FISH has not been performed for the karyotype analysis of Berberis. In the present study, we analysed the (AGGGTTT)3 and 5S rDNA FISH patterns in B. diaphana and B. soulieana chromosomes in combination with traditional cytological data. Although only two species of Berberis were involved in this research, the results will be of great significance in cytogenetic and taxonomic studies for Berberis species.

Results

FISH with oligo–(AGGGTTT)3 and oligo–5S rDNA probes

Mitotic metaphase chromosomes of B. diaphana after FISH are shown in Fig. 1. Consistent with the known chromosome number for most Berberis species, twenty–eight chromosomes were observed in B. diaphana. Only two chromosomes were labelled by 5S rDNA (Fig. 1a and c; red fluorescence, arrow) with relatively strong signals. In terms of the (AGGGTTT)3 probe (green fluorescence) shown in Fig. 1b and c, every chromosome displayed strong signals at the terminal regions of the long and short arms, and significant differences were not observed in the densities and locations. However, the satellited chromosome was an exception, and it presented a (AGGGTTT)3 probe hybridization site at the terminal region of the long arm and the satellite (arrow head).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Metaphase plates of Berberis diaphana visualized after FISH. Chromosomes probed with 5′– TAMRA–labelled 5S rDNA (red fluorescence, arrow) are shown in a and c; chromosomes probed with 5′– FAM–labelled (AGGGTTT)3 (green fluorescence) are shown in (b) and (c). The concentration of the probes used for (AGGGTTT)3 and 5S rDNA was 10 μM. All chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrowheads in (b) and (c) indicate satellites

Figure 2a shows the FISH results of B. soulieana, which are essentially consistent with that of B. diaphana in Fig. 1c, showing 28 chromosomes with one pair of satellited chromosomes. The signal of the telomere probe (AGGGTTT)3 was also located in the terminal region of each chromosome. However, the location and number of 5S rDNA in B. soulieana were different from those of B. diaphana. This species had four 5S rDNA signals with two weak signals at the end of long arms in 5th pair of chromosomes and another two strong signals detected in the interstitial region close to the end of long arms in 6th pair of chromosomes (Fig. 2d). In Fig. 2b, each large signal consists of two smaller signals. Moreover, secondary constrictions were found at the gap and the end of two small signals in Fig. 2b and c.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Metaphase (a) and prometaphase (b, c) plates of B. soulieana visualized after FISH. In (a), (AGGGTTT)3 signals are green colour labelled with 5′– FAM; and 5S rDNA signals are red colour labelled with 5′–TAMRA and indicated with arrows, while arrowheads indicate satellites. In (b), arrows indicate the 5S rDNA signals of chromosomes. In (c), arrows indicate secondary constrictions of the chromosomes with large 5S rDNA signals. Chromosome number in (d) of B. soulieane was sorted by length (captured from a)

Karyotype analysis

The karyotype analysis indicated that B. diaphana is diploid 2n = 2x = 28 and has a basic chromosome count (x) fourteen. The chromosomes relative lengths (Fig. 3) varied from 4.22 (chromosome 1) to 2.73 (chromosome 28), and the actual lengths for the chromosomes ranged from 2.75 μm to 1.82 μm (Table 1).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

FISH karyotype ideogram summarizing the 5S rDNA (red fluorescence) and (AGGGTTT)3 (green fluorescence) signals of Berberis diaphana. Chromosome pairs are numbered according to length as measured using NucType version 2013. Satellite length is not included in the chromosome length. Chromosomes in (a) were visualized by Photoshop CC 2015 with the images from Fig. 1c. Chromosomes in (b) correspond to the chromosome pairs in (a). The x–axis indicates the chromosome number, and the y–axis indicates the relative chromosome length

Table 1

Karyotype and FISH analysis in B. diaphana

Chr. No.

Chr. length (μm)

Arm ratio

FISH results

Chr. type

Long arm

Short arm

Lb + Sc

(AGGGTTT)3

5S rDNA

1

 1.50 ± 0.03a

 1.25 ± 0.03

 2.75 ± 0.00

1.20 ± 0.05

L

S

md

2

 1.47 ± 0.01

 1.25 ± 0.01

 2.72 ± 0.00

1.17 ± 0.01

L

S

m

3

 1.58 ± 0.04

 0.97 ± 0.01

 2.55 ± 0.03

1.62 ± 0.05

L

S

m

4

 1.41 ± 0.01

 1.08 ± 0.01

 2.49 ± 0.00

1.31 ± 0.02

L

S

m

5

 1.44 ± 0.02

 0.95 ± 0.04

 2.40 ± 0.05

1.51 ± 0.04

L

S

m

6

 1.25 ± 0.01

 1.15 ± 0.02

 2.40 ± 0.03

1.09 ± 0.01

L

S

L

m

7

 1.63 ± 0.02

 0.65 ± 0.04

 2.28 ± 0.06

2.49 ± 0.11

L

SAe

smf

8

 1.22 ± 0.03

 1.05 ± 0.02

 2.28 ± 0.00

1.17 ± 0.05

L

S

m

9

 1.17 ± 0.00

 1.09 ± 0.01

 2.25 ± 0.01

1.07 ± 0.01

L

S

m

10

 1.22 ± 0.05

 0.95 ± 0.01

 2.17 ± 0.04

1.28 ± 0.07

L

S

m

11

 1.17 ± 0.00

 0.99 ± 0.01

 2.16 ± 0.01

1.18 ± 0.01

L

S

m

12

 1.08 ± 0.00

 1.03 ± 0.00

 2.11 ± 0.00

1.06 ± 0.01

L

S

m

13

 1.00 ± 0.00

 0.89 ± 0.01

 1.89 ± 0.01

1.12 ± 0.02

L

S

m

14

 1.04 ± 0.01

 0.78 ± 0.03

 1.82 ± 0.04

1.33 ± 0.04

L

S

m

Note: aMean ± standard deviation, blong arm, cshort arm, dmetacentric, esatellite, and fsubmetacentric. The chromosome pair numbers correspond to the numbers in Fig. 2a

Regarding the chromosome length parameters shown in Table 1, the length ratio of the longest/shortest chromosome was 1.48 and the percentage of chromosome-arm ratio more than 2:1 was 0.07. Hence, B. diaphana falls into 2A according to the Stebbins karyotype asymmetry degree shown in Table 2. Regarding the type–based chromosome constitution [2n = 2x = 28 = 26 m + 2 sm (2SAT)], B. diaphana presented thirteen pairs of metacentric chromosomes and one pair of submetacentric chromosomes, which consisted of two satellited chromosomes (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Due to the centromere and telomere of B. soulieana in Fig. 2a are not clear; therefore, the karyotype analysis is not appropriate.
Table 2

Karyotype asymmetry index, according to Stebbins (1971)

Chromosome ratio

Percentage (arm ratio > 2:1)

0.00

0.01–0.05

0.51–0.99

1.00

<2:1

1A

2A

3A

4A

2:1–4:1

1B

2B

3B

4B

> 4:1

1C

2C

3C

4C

Note: Cytotypes closer to 4C show greater asymmetry

Discussion

Although 215 Berberis species (197 endemic) are found in China, only the chromosome numbers of 5 Berberis species have been recorded in Flora of China (revised English version): Berberis ulicina Hooker et Thomson, 2n = 28 (Page 16); Berberis julianae Schneid., 2n = 28 + 2B (Page 26); Berberis poiretii Schneid., 2n = 28 (Page 38); Berberis anhweiensis Ahrendt, 2n = 28 (Page 47); and Berberis amurensis Rupr., 2n = 28, 42 (Page 48) [2]. The Berberis chromosome number reported in Flora of China (revised English version) is 2n = 14, which is different from the numbers for the species mentioned above; in contrast, in the Chinese version of Flora of China, the basic chromosome number of Berberis is x = 14 [25]. Although some works have been conducted for chromosome counts, the karyotype analyses of only three Berberis species, Berberis asiatica Roxb. ex. DC, Berberis lyceum Royle [26] and Berberis julianae Schneid [16], have been described. Nevertheless, there are few good images of chromosomes in somatic cells, and bicolour FISH has not previously been used to analyse Berberis karyotypes.

Consistent with B. diaphana and B. soulieana, satellited chromosomes have also been reported in other Berberis species from eastern Asia, although in some species, satellites were either not observed or the number of satellites was stable at only two [7, 26]. Srivastava et al. [26] showed that the karyotype formulae of B. asiatica and B. lyceum were 2n = 2x = 28 = 4 m + 22 sm + 2 st and 2n = 2x = 28 = 8 m + 18 sm + 2 st, respectively indicating that the species belong to cytotypes 2B and 1B, respectively. For B. julianae, which is also distributed in Southwest China, Huang and Zhao [16] proposed a karyotype formula of 2n = 28 + 2B = 24 m + 4 sm + 2B, indicating that the species belongs to cytotype 2A. In the present study, the karyotype of B. diaphana was 2n = 2x = 28 = 26 m + 2 sm (2SAT), indicating that the species belongs to cytotype 2A.

The chromosome sizes for the Indian species B. asiatica and B. lyceum ranged widely from 3.2 ± 0.07 μm to 11.2 ± 0.09 μm and from 2.1 ± 0.09 μm to 7.33 ± 0.07 μm, respectively [26]. In comparison, the chromosome sizes for B. diaphana in this study had a small range of variation from 1.82 ± 0.04 μm to 2.75 ± 0.00 μm (Table 1). Although it is inaccurate to compare the sizes of chromosomes among different species because of variations in cell cycle stages and the degree of squashing, data on ratios, such as the arm ratio and relative length, are still valid [13]. Both Berberis species native to Southwest China, i.e., B. julianae and B. diaphana, exhibited chromosome morphological similarities that were mainly in the identified submetacentric and metacentric chromosomes, and the metacentric chromosomes were dominant. Furthermore, both species belonged to cytotype 2A, which is considered relatively primitive in Stebbins’s system [27]. The two Indian species B. asiatica and B. lyceum (cytotypes 2B and 1B) have more asymmetric chromosomes than the Chinese species B. diaphana and B. julianae (cytotype 2A). The major trend in flowering plants is from symmetrical to asymmetrical chromosomes [27]. According to the palaeoenvironment and palaeovegetation study of Sun [28], the ancient altitude of northern Tibet was approximately 2000 m in the Early Miocene, which was suitable for temperate plants to migrate from East Asia to the Indian subcontinent. The discovery of Berberis cf. asiatica (the conformis of B. asiatica) fossils from the Early Miocene indicated that Berberis originated in East Asia and then migrated to the Indian subcontinent through northern Tibet. Based on the above discussion, we surmise that the chromosome structure variation from symmetrical to more asymmetrical may have occurred in Berberis during the transmission from East Asia to the Indian subcontinent.

This study reports the physical locations of (AGGGTTT)3 and 5S rDNA loci as determined by bicolour FISH in Berberis species for the first time. The density of the largest signals in B. soulieana (Fig. 2a) was much greater than that of B. diaphana (Fig. 1a), which suggested that there are more abundant 5S rDNA copies in B. soulieana. An increase in the repeat sequences may cause an increase of chromosome length, which could partly explain why the karyotype of B. diaphana was quite different from that of the other two Indian Berberis species. The secondary constrictions near the largest 5S rDNA signals in the prometaphase chromosomes of B. soulieana (Fig. 2b, c) indicated the chromosome structural difference between the two species. The difference in the number and loci of 5S rDNA between B. diaphana and B. soulieana may be caused by unequal values exchange chromosomes, increased potential rDNA copies by transposons, and chromosome rearrangement [23, 29]. Most species of the genus Berberis have 28 chromosomes; hence, a high diversity of this genus may not be due to chromosome number and ploidy. However, revealing the differences in 5S rDNA loci and chromosome structure between B. soulieana and B. diaphana may provide insights into the crucial role of chromosome structural differences in the diversity of the genus Berberis. One pair of 5S signals was localized in the terminal region of the long arms of the chromosomes, whereas in Epimedium, another genus of Berberidaceae, one or two pairs of 5S rDNA sites were localized in the interstitial regions of chromosome long arms [23]. Thus, changes in 5S rDNA loci may have occurred between the two genera over the evolutionary course of Berberidaceae as long as the 5S rDNA patterns were concordant among Berberis species. Li et al. [30] reported that telomeres and 45S rDNA are co–localized in chromosome telomeric regions in Chrysanthemum segetum. Furthermore, telomere and 45S rDNA sequences are structurally linked on the chromosomes of C. segetum, although whether such a structural connection between rDNA and telomere sequences occurs in B. diaphana remains to be studied.

Bottini et al. [8] indicated that polyploidy may have helped B. buxifolia and B. heterophylla (2n = 56) adapt to an extremely low–rainfall environment. The results from Meng et al. [31, 32] suggested that polyploids might have played an important role in the evolution of some alpine species. However, studies have indicated that polyploidization may not be a dominant evolutionary process in alpine Berberis [7, 18]. Unfortunately, only one of the alpine Berberis species in Southwest China was involved in this study. To understand how genetic characteristics affect the adaptability and diversity of Berberis species, we will further investigate and compare the cytogenetics of other Berberis species via FISH analysis.

Conclusions

FISH physical mapping of Berberis diaphana suggested that (AGGGTTT)3 and rDNA 5S co-localize in chromosome pair 6. The density, location and number difference of 5S rDNA loci indicated the structural differences in the chromosomes between B. diaphana and B. soulieana. Our results provide information that may contribute to future studies on the physical assembly of the Berberis genome and the evolution of rDNA and telomere FISH patterns in Berberis.

Methods

Plant materials and chromosome preparation

Berberis diaphana seeds were gathered from an altitude of 3600 m at the Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan Province, China in Oct 2017 then stored at 4 °C, and then they were germinated in soil in May 2018. A B. soulieana sapling was obtained from Hubei Province, China. Slide preparation was performed according to the method of Komuro et al. [33] but with modifications. When the root tips reached at 1.5 cm, they were cut and immediately kept in a sealed iron tank full of nitrous oxide for 2–4 h. The root tips were soaked in glacial acetic acid for 15 min and then stored in 75% ethyl alcohol at  20 °C, which can be maintained for long-term periods. We excised 1–2 mm of root tip and placed it in a 0.2 mL tube with 10 μL cellulose and pectinase (2:1) at 37 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, 100 μL dd H2O was added to the tube with the root tip and then removed twice, and this step was repeated twice using 100% ethyl alcohol. Then, 20 μL 100% acetic acid was added to each tube and the root tip was stirred into a suspension. A 10 μL drop of the mixture was placed onto a slide, and the air-dried slides were investigated with an Olympus CX21 microscope (Olympus, Japan) and finally stored at − 20 °C after the position of the metaphase cell was marked.

Probe DNA preparation

The oligogenic sequence repeats probe (AGGGTTT)3 consisted of the following 21 bp fragment: 5′ AGGGTTTAGGGTTTAGGGTTT 3′. The 41 bp fragment oligonucleotide 5S rDNA probe 5′ TCAGAACTCCGAAGTTAAGCGTGCTTGGGCGAGGTAGTAC 3′ was reported by Luo et al. [22]. The two oligo-probes were tested in B. diaphana and B. soulieana and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The oligo5S rDNA probe was 5′ end–labelled with 6–carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA), whereas the (AGGGTTT)3 probe was 5′ end–labelled with 6–carboxyfluorescein (FAM). The two oligo probes were dissolved in 1 × TE solution and then stored at − 20 °C with a concentration of 10 μM.

FISH and karyotype analysis

FISH with bicolour probes was performed as previously described by Luo et al. [22]. The chromosome slides were soaked and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 10 min and then washed twice for 5 min with 2 × SSC. Subsequently, slides were dehydrated with a series of 75, 95, and 100% ethanol for 5 min each and air dried, and then 60 μL of deionized formamide was added to the slides, which were then covered with cover glass. Next, the slides were denatured for 2 min at 80 °C and then immediately placed in an ethanol series at − 20 °C. A 10 μL mixture of 0.35 μL probes, 4.825 μL 2 × SSC and 4.825 μL 1 × TE was dropped onto the air-drying slide, which was then covered with another cover glass. Chromosomes and probes were hybridized at 37 °C on for 1.5 h. The slides were then rinsed twice for 5 min with 2 × SSC and finally with dd H2O. The air-dried chromosomes counterstained with 4,6diamidino2phenylindole (DAPI, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, USA) were captured with an Olympus BX–63 microscope connected to a Photometric SenSys Olympus DP70 CCD camera (Olympus, Japan).

Raw images were processed with DP Manager Version 3.1.1.208 (Olympus, Japan) and Photoshop CC 2015 (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA, USA). Karyotype data (relative length, arm ratio, and cytotype) were determined with NucType 2013. The actual chromosome lengths were converted from relative lengths based on the real length of the scale bar. The mean actual length and arm ratio values were the average values for homologous chromosomes. Karyotype ideograms were mapped using Excel 2010 based on the relative chromosome lengths. The chromosomes number was determined based on the relative lengths, with the longest assigned the number 1 and the shortest assigned the number 28, and they corresponded to the chromosome pairs 114. Chromosome classification was performed according to the arm ratio [34] as presented in Table 3, and the cytotype was determined based on the chromosome ratio and the percentage of chromosomes with an arm ratio greater than 2:1 [35] as listed in Table 2. The arm ratio = the length of the long arm/short arm, and the chromosome ratio = the length of the longest chromosome/shortest chromosome.
Table 3

Chromosome morphology

Arm ratio

Centromere

Abbreviation

1.00

median point

M

1.01–1.70

median region

m

1.71–3.00

submedian region

sm

3.01–7.00

subterminal region

st

>7.00

terminal region

t

terminal point

T

Abbreviations

5S: 

5S rDNA

6-FAM: 

6-carboxyfluorescein

6-TAMRA: 

6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine

AGT: 

(AGGGTTT)3

DAPI: 

4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

FISH: 

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

SSC: 

Saline sodium citrate

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (31500993).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

JL carried out the FISH and analysed the hybridization signal sites. XL designed the study and prepared the probes for the FISH. JL wrote the paper and XL revised the paper. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Huimin Road 211, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, 611130, China

References

  1. Ahrendt L. Berberis and Mahonia, a taxonomic revision. Bot J Lin Soc. 1961;57:1–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1961.tb00889.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ying JS. Editorial Board for Flora of China. Flora of China (revised English version). In: Ying JS (ed) Vol. 19. Beijing: Science Press; 2011. p 715–771. http://foc.iplant.cn/content.aspx?TaxonId=103816.
  3. Xiang QS. Comparative study the contents of berberine with three kinds of Berberis in Qinghai. Dissertation. Qinghai University; 2015. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10743-1015950265.htm. Accessed 5 June 2018.
  4. Elmerahbi R, Liu YN, Eid A, Daoud G, Hosry L, Monzer A, et al. Berberis libanotica Ehrenb extract shows anti–neoplastic effects on prostate cancer stem/progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112453.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang Y, Li X, Zou D, Liu W, Yang J, et al. Treatment of type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia with the natural plant alkaloid berberine. J Clin Endocr & Metab. 2008;93:2559. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2404.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jeelani SM, Kumar S, Rani S, Kumari S, Gupta RC. Cytogenetics of four species of genus Berberis L (Berberidaceae Juss.) from the western Himalayas. Cytologia. 2014;79:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.79.111.
  7. Huang YL, Tseng YH, Chung KF, Yu CC. Chromosome numbers of Berberis sect. Wallichianae from Taiwan: a new basis for taxonomic and evolutionary implications. Taiwania. 2018;63:111–118. https://doi.org/10.6165/tai.2018.63.111.
  8. Bottini MCJ, Greizerstein EJ, Poggio L. Ploidy levels and their relationships with the rainfall in several populations of Patagonian species of Berberis L. Caryologia. 1999;52:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1998.10589156.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottini MCJ, Bustos AD, Sanso AM, Jouve N, Poggio L. Relationships in Patagonian species of Berberis (Berberidaceae) based on the characterization of rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Bot J Lin Soc. 2007;153:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00586.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim YD, Kim SH, Landrum LR. Taxonomic and phytogeographic implications from its phylogeny in Berberis (Berberidaceae). J Plant Res. 2004;117:175–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-004-0145-7.
  11. Adhikari B, Milne RI, Pennington RT, Särkinen T, Pendry C. Systematics and biogeography of Berberis s.l. inferred from nuclear ITS and chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Taxon. 2015;64:39–48. https://doi.org/10.12705/641.21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Angulo DF, Amarilla LD, Anton AM, Sosa V. Colonization in north American arid lands: the journey of Agarito (Berberis trifoliolata) revealed by multi-locus molecular data and packrat midden fossil remains. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0168933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Stace CA. Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21th centuries. Taxon. 2000;49:451–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim YD, Jansen RK. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL and its sequence variation in the Berberidaceae. Sys Bot. 1996;21:381–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419666.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang W, Chen ZD, Liu Y, Li RQ, Li JH. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Berberidaceae in the northern hemisphere. Sys Bot. 2007;32(4):731–742. https://doi.org/10.1043/06-16.1.
  16. Huang SF, Zhao ZF. Karyotype analysis of four medicinal plants. Res For Sc. 1997;10:443–447. http://www.cqvip.com/qk/96135X/199704/2639595.html.
  17. Giffen MH. The chromosome numbers of berberis. Trans S Afr Philos Soc. 2000;24:203–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00359193709518916.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Adhikari B, Pendry CA, Möller M. New chromosome counts of Berberis L. (Berberidaceae) suggest that polyploidy does not play a significant role in the diversification of the genus in the Nepal Himalaya. Edinb J Bot. 2004;71:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428614000158.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sodagar N, Bahrami AR, Memariani F, Ejtehadi H, Vaezi J, Khosravi AR. Biosystematic study of the genus Berberis L. (Berberidaceae) in Khorassan, NE Iran. Plant Sys & Evol. 2012;298:193–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0537-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuchs J, Brandes A, Schubert I. Telomere sequence localization and karyotype evolution in higher plants. Plant Sys & Evol. 1995;196:227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00982962.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin CC, Sasi R, Fan YS, Chen ZQ. New evidence for tandem chromosome fusions in the karyotypic evolution of Asian muntjacs. Chromosoma. 1991;101:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00360682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo X, Liu J, Zhao A, Chen X, Wan W, Chen L. Karyotype analysis of Piptanthus concolor based on FISH with a oligonucleotides for rDNA 5S. Sci Horticul. 2017;226:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.09.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheng MY, Wang LJ. Chromosomal localization of 45s and 5S rDNA in 14 species and the implications for genome evolution of genus Epimedium. Plant Sys & Evol. 2010;290:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0349-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu B, Chen CB, Li XL, Chen RY, Song WQ. Physical mapping of 45S rDNA on metaphase chromosomes in several plant species. Acta Sci Natur Uni Nankai. 2006;39:96–102. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0465-7942.2006.04.020.
  25. Editorial Board for Flora of China. Flora of China. In: Ying JS, Chen DZ (ed) Vol. 29. Beijing: Science Press; 2001. p. 54. http://frps.iplant.cn/frps/Berberis
  26. Srivastava V, Mishra K, Husain T, Agnihotri P. Karyotypic analysis in Western Himalayan species of Berberis L. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biol Chem Sci. 2014;5(2):1244 ISSN: 0975-8585.Google Scholar
  27. Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold Ltd; 1971. p. 72–73. ISBN-13: 978-0713122886.Google Scholar
  28. Sun B. A study on Miocene plants and Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Dissertation Univ Chinese Acad Sci. 2016. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y3106908.
  29. Cai Q, Zhang D, Liu Z, et al. Chromosomal localization of 5S and 18S rDNA in five species of subgenus Strobus and their implications for genome evolution of Pinus. Ann Bot. 2006;97(5):715–722. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Li J, He S, Zhang L, Hu Y, Yang F, Ma L, Huang J, Li L. Telomere and 45S rDNA sequences are structurally linked on the chromosomes in Chrysanthemum segetum L. Protoplasma. 2012;249:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-011-0279-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Meng Y, Sun H, Yang YP, Nie ZL. Polyploidy and new chromosome counts in Anaphalis (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from the Qinghai–Tibet plateau of China. J Sys Evol. 2010;48:58–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-6831.2009.00061.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Meng Y, Nie ZL, Sun H, Yang YP. Chromosome numbers and polyploidy in Leontopodium (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae) from the Qinghai–Tibet plateau of S.W. China. Caryologia. 2012;65:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2012.709779.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Komuro S, Endo R, Shikata K, Kato A. Genomic and chromosomal distribution patterns of various repeated DNA sequences in wheat revealed by a fluorescence in situ hybridization procedure. Genome. 2013;56:131–137 https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2013-0003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Levan A, Fedga K, Sandberg AA. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 1964;52:201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li MX, Chen RY. A suggestion on the standardization of karyotype analysis in plants. Wuhan Bot Res. 1985;3:297–302. http://plantscience.cn/EN/abstract/abstract35.shtml

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2019

Advertisement