Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

Comparative analysis of the genetic variability within the Q-type C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factors in the economically important cabbage, canola and Chinese cabbage genomes


  • Received: 2 April 2018
  • Accepted: 22 August 2018
  • Published:



Brassica oleracea, B. rapa and B. napus encompass many economically important vegetable and oil crops; such as cabbage, broccoli, canola and Chinese cabbage. The genome sequencing of these species allows for gene discovery with an eye towards discerning the natural variability available for future breeding. The Q-type C2H2 zinc-finger protein (ZFP) transcription factors contain zinc finger motifs with a conserved QALGGH as part of the motif and they may play a critical role in the plants response to stress. While they may contain from one to five ZF domains (ZFD) this work focuses on the ZFPs that contain two zinc-fingers, which bind to the promoter of genes, and negatively regulate transcription via the EAR motif. B. oleracea and rapa are diploid and evolved into distinct species about 3.7 million years ago. B. napus is polyploid and formed by fusion of the diploids about 7500 years ago.


This work identifies a total of 146 Q-type C2H2-ZFPs with 37 in B. oleracea, 35 in B. rapa and 74 in B. napus. The level of sequence similarity and arrangement of these genes on their chromosomes have mostly remained intact in B. napus, when compared to the chromosomes inherited from either B. rapa or oleracea. In contrast, the difference between the protein sequences of the orthologs of B. rapa and oleracea is greater and their organization on the chromosomes is much more divergent. In general, the 146 proteins are highly conserved especially within the known motifs. Differences within subgroups of ZFPs were identified. Considering that B. napus has twice the number of these proteins in its genome, RNA-Seq data was mined and the expression of 68 of the 74 genes was confirmed.


Alignment of these proteins gives a snapshot of the variability that may be available naturally in Brassica species. The aim is to study how different ZFPs bind different genes or how dissimilar EAR motifs alter the negative regulation of the genes bound to the ZFP. Results from such studies could be used to enhance tolerance in future Brassica breeding programs.


  • Brassica
  • Q-type C2H2 zinc finger transcription factors
  • Cabbage
  • Canola


Q-type C2H2 zinc finger proteins (ZFP) are transcription factors. “Q-type” refers to the invariant QALGGH sequence found in the zinc finger domains, and C2H2 characterizes the two cysteine and two histidine residues found in each finger. These residues bind a zinc ion that stabilizes the ZFP and allows binding specificity to a domain within the promoter of the gene it regulates. First discovered in petunia by Takatsuji et al. [1], a total of 21 Q-type C2H2 ZFPs have been described in that species [2]. Using in silico methods, Englbrecht et al. [3] described 3 groups of ZFPs in Arabidopsis; A, B and C, with the C family divided into three additional groups (C1, C2 and C3) depending on the number of spaces between the invariant histidines. There are 64 members in the C1 family that contain either a single or a cluster of two to five zinc finger domains (ZFDs). The C1 family has three amino acids between the histidines and contains many proteins responsive to environmental stress [4, 5]. In Arabidopsis, the 18 two fingered Q-type C2H2 ZFP proteins are members of the C1-2i and here will be referred to as ZFPs. The Arabidopsis proteins cluster into five groups named 2i-A-D with an outlier-X [3]. These ZFPs include a conserved domain containing the amino acids DLN. It is similar to the first active repression motif described in plants [6], which was named the ethylene-responsive element-binding factor (ERF)-associated amphiphilic repression (or EAR) domain. A role for the EAR motif as an active repressor was also demonstrated in ZFPs of Arabidopsis [7]. Ectopic expression of ZFPs can lead to an increase in tolerance to specific stresses [5]. Subsequently additional studies identifying all forms of C2H2 ZFPs have been undertaken in for example rice, foxtail millet, poplar and crocus [811]. Several other studies focused specifically on the Q-type C2H2 TFs, for example in poplar, or bread wheat [12, 13]. Generally, these studies utilize the availability of a published genome sequence, however, studies in bread wheat (a hexaploid organism) and crocus relied on ESTs from public databases [11, 13]. The work described in this manuscript, catalogs the Q-type ZFPs in three Brassica species. Therefore, naturally occurring variants within these proteins can be utilized in subsequent studies to identify how the altered sequences could affect gene expression. ZFPs might be useful as tools for breeding increased tolerance to biotic or abiotic stresses encountered by cole crops.

In the current study, we identify ZFPs of economically important Brassica species, and analyze their structure and their expression using RNA-Seq data from previously published work. To cast a wide net for capturing genetically related ZFPs, three related species were examined and compared to Arabidopsis ZFPs. Arabidopsis is also a member of the Brassicaceae and evolved from the same ancestral progenitor as the Brassica species. The Arabidopsis lineage split from this ancestral progenitor approximately 20 million years ago (mya) with a whole genome duplication occurring in the Brassica lineage ~ 16 mya, which is reflected in a doubling in gene number when comparing Brassica to Arabidopsis [14]. Comparative mapping of Arabidopsis to several other similar species provides evidence for an ancestral Arabidopsis genome that has been divided into 24 blocks [15]. These have been reshuffled in present day Arabidopsis and these syntenic blocks have also been identified in modern Brassica species. Maps showing the reorganization of these blocks in B. rapa and B. oleracea have been published along with the genome sequences of these species [16, 17]. The blocks are not collinear in B. oleracea and B. rapa but have a different organizational pattern, probably due to chromosomal translocations during the time since these species split from their shared ancestor, about 3.7 mya [14]. These species are diploid, containing 9 and 10 chromosomes, respectively. Their genomes fused and duplicated to form B. napus ~ 7500 years ago [18]. Brassica species therefore are both diploid and polyploid. The triangle of U [19] represents their evolution with the diploid species B. rapa, nigra and oleracea at the points of the triangle containing genomes A, B and C respectively. Between the tips of the triangle are the polyploid species with B. napus along the side of the triangle between B. rapa and B. oleracea containing both A and C genomes, respectively. Since B. rapa contains 10 chromosomes and B. oleracea contains 9 chromosomes the B. napus genome still maintains 19 chromosomes. Indeed, the 19 B. napus chromosomes are labeled chromosome A1-A10 and C01-C09, reflecting the genomes from which they were derived. These species include many important oil and vegetable crops; such as broccoli, cabbage, Chinese cabbage and canola. Given the evolution of these crops, the comparison of the Q-type ZFPs in the three reference genomes should provide a picture of the genetic diversity available for testing the effects of different ZFPs on the biotic stress response in these species. Since this group of Q-type ZFPs have previously been associated with regulating environmental stress and can enhance tolerance to the stress [5], identification of these proteins in the commercially important Brassica species may lead to their use in breeding programs. This work identified 146 ZFPs in three Brassica species. Prior studies analyzing the ZFDs and EAR motifs mutated one protein at a time and demonstrated how this altered either DNA binding for the ZFDs or negative regulation with the modified EAR motif [2, 4, 5]. The study documented here begins to address how much variation in these motifs can occur naturally.


Proteins with sequence similarity to the Arabidopsis Q-type two-fingered C2H2 TF, Zat11 were identified using BLASTX in Bolbase (, a database accessing the annotated Brassica oleracea genome [20]. Proteins from B. oleracea containing two Q-type C2H2 zinc finger motifs were selected and their best Arabidopsis match was found using BLASTP in the Arabidopsis genome database TAIR ( Ensembl Plants was also used for identification of additional B. oleracea genes and genes within the B. rapa genomes Finally, Genescope was used to identify B. napus genes Subsequently Ensembl Plants was also used for updating genes from B. napus.

For the phylogenetic analysis, proteins were aligned using CLUSTAL W and the phylogenetic tree was inferred using the Maximum likelihood method and the JTT matrix based model [21]. 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed [22]. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [23]. Alignment of Q-type ZFPs was performed using CLUSTAL OMEGA from Tools/msa/clustalo/. The proteins were analyzed using the program MEME (Multiple motifs for EM Elicitation) at ( to identify conserved motifs. Nuclear localization domains were located using NLSMapper

The NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) SRA (Sequence Read Archive) was examined for transcriptome studies of B. oleracea and B. napus to identify transcribed ZFPs. Ensembl Plants and Genescope were also used to catalog the location of ZFP genes on the genome.

Results and discussion

Identification and phylogenetic analysis of Brassica genes

The B. rapa, oleracea and napus genomes [1618] were searched by BLASTX using the Arabidopsis ZFP, Zat11 and 146 unique genes were identified. Initially a search of Bolbase [20] identified 25 unique B. oleracea Q-type C2H2 TFs [24]. A subsequent examination of the B. oleracea genome from Ensembl Plants ( led to identification of 12 more ZFP genes (see Additional file 1). All 146 ZFP genes mined in this study were renamed based on their species designation (Bo, Br, BnaA or BnaC) followed by a ZFP and numbered based on their positions on the chromosome map. For example, the ZFP named BrZFP1 is found at the top of chromosome A1 in the B. rapa genome. The original gene name and location on the genome is listed (see Additional file 1). Several protein sequences were modified from the original genome annotation, based on comparison with the other closest homologs. These comparisons revealed that several of the originally annotated B. napus gene sequences included an intron that interrupted the conceptual translation and resulted in loss of protein sequence present in either the B. oleracea or the B rapa orthologs. The intron sequences were added back to these transcripts and re-translated, which resulted in proteins highly identical to those predicted from the diploid genomes of B. oleracea and B. rapa. A dataset has been published examining the Brassica napus transcriptome [25], in which our protein sequences were confirmed in the A (B. rapa) derived genome. The altered genes were given the prefix My and the protein sequences are shown (see Additional file 1) and are also aligned (see Additional file 2) to pinpoint the genes altered from the databases.

A phylogenetic map containing the 18 Arabidopsis proteins and 146 proteins from the three Brassica species (see Additional file 3) was generated using CLUSTALW and maximum likelihood analysis in MEGA6 software [23]. The Brassica proteins mapped into 5 groups clustering with the Arabidopsis proteins, which will also be referred to as groups 2i-A-D and X (Fig. 1). Alignments of the protein sequences using CLUSTAL OMEGA without Arabidopsis sequences confirmed the 5-subgroups (2i-A-D and X) found for the Arabidopsis proteins (see Additional file 2).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Skeletonized phylogenetic tree of Brassica and Arabidopsis (Zats) Q-type ZFPs form 5 groups. The tree shows the position of the 18 Zats and the major bootstrap values. Groups are delineated as 2i-B, 2i-A, 2i-C, 2i-D and 2i-X in pink blue, green, yellow and turquoise, respectively. The proteins were aligned with CLUSTALW and the phylogenetic tree was generated using the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. A complete tree with the names of all Brassica and Arabidopsis proteins are in (Additional file 3)

Comparative mapping of Brassica ZFPs

A map of the chromosomes comparing the position of ZFP genes from B. oleracea, rapa to napus is shown (Fig. 2). Most ZFP genes map not only to the same chromosome between the species, but to a similar location within the chromosome. The orthologs also generally contain 97–100% identity in protein sequence. Brassica rapa contains 35 ZFPs, while the A genome (derived from B. rapa) of B. napus contains 38 ZFPs. Once again a comparison of the A genome (B. rapa derived) of B. napus (A01-A10) with that of B. rapa (A1-A10) shows the co-linearity between the ZFP genes along the same chromosome and within the same general location on the chromosome. The orthologs between these two species of the A genome also show between 97 and 100% identity in their protein sequences. Comparison of the C genome (B. oleracea derived) chromosomes of B. napus (C01-C09) with B. oleracea (C1-C9) shows that there are 37 ZFPs in the B. oleracea genome and 36 ZFPs in the B. napus C genome. Two B. oleracea, 5 BnaC and 3 BnaA ZFP genes remain to be mapped onto chromosomes (see Additional file 1). However mapped ZFPs show the same strong percent identity to their unmapped orthologs. For example, BoZFP20 and BnaCZFP32 protein sequences are 100% identical, but the B. napus gene is currently unmapped.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Comparison of ZFP proteins on diploid Brassica species and the polyploid Brassica napus. Chromosomes of Brassica rapa in dark gray (BrZFP) Brassica oleracea in dark blue (BoZFP) to Brassica napus with the A genome in light gray (BnaAZFP) and C genome in light blue (BnaCZFP). BnaAZFP36, 37 and 38 are unmapped. Within the 35 BnaAZFP mapped genes, 83% (29) map to similar positions as BrZFP genes. Of the 38 BnaAZFP proteins 84% (32) have 97–100% (red) identity and 3 have 93–96% (purple). The final 3 proteins (black) have 81% (BnaAZFP9), 56% (BnaAZFP21) and 85% (BnaAZFP34) identity to the Br homolog. Generally, the BoZFP and the BnaCZFP genes map to the same location on the chromosome with either 96–100% (red) or 93–95% (purple) identity. BoZFP20 and BoZFP32 have homologous proteins that are currently unmapped in the B. napus genome (BnaCZFP32 and BnaCZFP33), while BoZFP4 and BoZFP8 (black) have no homolog in the B. napus genome. BoZFP36 and BoZFP37 (black) are currently unmapped on the B. oleracea genome and they are homologous to BnaCZFP34 and BnaCZFP35, which are also unmapped. BoZFP7 (black) is a homolog and maps to a B. napus gene that contains only a portion of the ORF

Comparisons of the map positions and protein sequence identities between ZFP genes of the diploid species, B. rapa and B. oleracea (Fig. 3) show more divergence in comparison to B. napus, as would be expected from species that appeared so much earlier than the formation of B. napus. Only 13 ZFP genes map to the same location and their gene products exhibit 92–98% protein sequence identity. Three genes in B. oleracea from chromosome 9 map to a similar location on chromosome 10 of B. rapa. This supports similar findings that the A and C genomes of B. oleracea and B. rapa have had more opportunity to diverge from one another than they have from the B. napus genome.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Comparison of map position and percent identity between the diploid Brassicas. Brassica rapa (top) and Brassica oleracea (bottom) chromosomes with red gene names containing protein sequences that are 92–98% identical, map to the same chromosome and are in identical order. BrZFP10 and BrZFP11 are tandem duplications. Genes in black are not present in the other species (BoZFP23, BoZFP29, BoZFP36). BrZFP14 is a homolog of BoZFP1, which is currently unmapped. Additional homologous pairs between the two species are identified by like colors and with or without underline or italics. These additional genes generally do not appear in the same genomic location. An exception is the 3 genes in orange on either chr 9 of B. oleracea or chr 10 of B. rapa

Evolution of Arabidopsis and Brassica ZFPs

The number of orthologs of the eighteen Arabidopsis ZFPs in the Brassica oleracea, rapa and A and C genome of B. napus is shown in Tables 1 and 2. There are generally 2 or 3 homologs of most Arabidopsis ZFPs represented in the B. oleracea and B. rapa genomes, which is consistent with the genome duplication event that took place in the Brassica progenitor at about 16 mya after the split from Arabidopsis. While Zat12 has four homologs in B. rapa, one of these is a tandem duplication and probably arose after the evolution of B. napus. Only two of the Arabidopsis genes (Zat6 and AZF3) have a single homolog in B. oleracea or B. rapa, and there are no homologs in the Brassica genomes for Zat7 and Zat8. However, these are tandem duplications in the Arabidopsis genome of Zat16, suggesting that they may have arisen after the split of Arabidopsis from the Brassica species. Zat16 does have two homologs in both B. oleracea and B. rapa.
Table 1

Number of Arabidopsis ZFP homologs in the Brassica A and C genome

Gene Name

Arabidopsis Gene ID

# of Bo homologs

# of Br homologs

# of BnaA homologs

# of BnaC homologs







Zat10 (2i-D)






ZAT5 (2i-C)






ZAT17 (2i-B)






ZAT11 (2i-A)






ZAT15 (2i-C)






AZF2 (2i-D)






ZAT16 (2i-B)






ZAT8 (2i-B)






ZAT7 (2i-B)






ZAT13 (2i-D)






ZAT18 (2i-A)






ZAT14 (2i-C)






ZAT6 (2i-D)












AZF3 (2i-D)






ZAT12 (2i-B)






AZF1 (2i-D)






Table 2

Homologs of ZFPs from Arabidopsis and Brassica A and C genome

*members of tandem duplications in square boxes

Generally, when two genomes combine and double their chromosomes, genes are lost over evolutionary time to compensate for the massive increase in genes. However, B. napus is a relatively new polyploid (forming ~ 7500 years ago) and may not have completely achieved this balance. The number of Q-type-ZFPs found in B. napus is 74, which is slightly more than double the amount in the diploid species. There have also been tandem duplications of genes in B. rapa and both the BnaA and BnaC genomes, which are not present in the other genomes, suggesting that they occurred after splitting (in the case of the diploids) or merging in the case of the tetraploid (Table 2). There were tandem duplications in the BnaA genome for Zat12 and Zat16 and Zat11. In B. napus there are a total of 3 Zat15 homologs and all three are 100% identical to their B. oleracea and B rapa homologs. Since the diploid genomes have two Zat15 homologs each, the B. napus genome has lost one (Table 2).

Conserved protein motifs and zinc finger spacing in Brassica ZFPs

To understand the variation in conserved protein motifs in the Brassica ZFPs, the MEME Suite ( was used to identify common motifs in all 146 Brassica ZFPs and separately in each subgroup (2i-A-D and X). There are four conserved motifs in the Q-type two fingered ZFPs (Fig. 4). The first motif is the L-box, a leucine rich domain near the amino terminal end of the protein. The two zinc fingers are also conserved, with an invariant QALGGH in both zinc finger motifs and unique characteristics within these two motifs. The EAR motif was also examined for each group of Brassica ZFPs. A composite motif for each of the two zinc fingers, the L-box and EAR motif is presented (Fig. 4). Variations and similarities in amino acids within the motifs for each subgroup (2iA-D and X) are also shown (Fig. 4). The first zinc finger motif contains the following invariant amino acid sequence ‘CXXCXXXFXSXQALGGHXXXH’ with X being a placeholder representing variable residues within the protein sequence. The 2i-A and B groups have a KT between the two invariant Cs, and an F between the invariant S and Q. Finally, the first zinc finger motif of the 2i-A group ends with RAXHKKPKL while the 2i-B group ends with RASHXXXX. The 2i-C group starts with CXTC and has an F between the invariant S and QALGGH and ends with RXSHKKXX. The 2i-D subgroup starts with CXVC and ends with SYQALGGHKXSHRXXX. Finally, the 2i-X group starts with CKXC and ends with SHQALGGHRXSHKKVK. All the subgroups have an R after the QALGGH except for the 2i-D group. Similar specific intra-motif sequences can be observed in the second zinc finger motif (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Conserved motifs identified in 146 Brassica ZFP proteins and in all five separate ZFP groups. A cartoon (top) shows the position of the conserved motifs on the protein sequence. Consensus motifs common to all 146 Q-type ZFPs from Brassica oleracea, rapa and napus include, 2 zinc finger motifs with invariant QALGGH (center) and an L-box (left) and EAR-motif (right). Amino acids in bold black are invariant within the composite motifs. Red and green amino acids are common to more than one of the subgroups within either the first or second zinc finger motifs. Alignment of all Brassica proteins in each subgroup confirms the presence of the motif variations (see Additional file 2)

The spacing of the fingers is believed to be important to the DNA motifs they bind, and unlike ZFPs found in other organisms, is variable in plants [26]. For example, the 2iA group had ~ 19 amino acids between zinc fingers, 2i-B between 21 and 26, 2i-C 39–52, 2i-D 33–44 and 2i-X 39–43 amino acids between the zinc fingers (see Additional file 2). The 2i-X proteins all contained a string of “E”s in the spacer region between zinc fingers (see Additional file 2).

Nuclear localization sequences (NLS) were also predicted in the 146 ZFPs using NLSMapper (see Additional file 2). The NLS motifs were identified in different positions in the different groups of ZFPs. The 2i-A proteins had the NLS motif within the first zinc finger, 2i-B did not contain a NLS domain as defined by NLS mapper, 2i-C and 2i-D contained a NLS N terminal of the L box and 2i-X contained an NLS at the end of the zinc finger spacer (see Additional file 2).

The L-box is far less conserved, but contains 3–4 negatively charged amino acids D or E followed by amino acids with nonpolar neutral side chains such as ACLMI (hence the name L-box) as well as polar neutral side chains such as NST. The subgroups follow this general pattern, but there is little consensus within the groups (Fig. 4). Generally, the composite EAR motif contains DLNL. The 2i-A and 2i-C groups both contain the sequence LDLNL with a TP at the end for 2i-A and PA at the end for 2i-C. The 2i-B group has little consensus with variants at each amino acid. The 2i-D group contains DLN but none of the other amino acids are invariant. The 2i-X group contains LDLXLXC. Kagale and Rozwadowski [27] examined EAR motifs in plant species and defined LxLxL and DLNxxP as the most common types. The Brassica species in 2i-A and C match the LxLxL group while the 2i-D group conform to the DLN type EAR motif, but only a subgroup contains DLNxxP (see Additional file 2).

A manuscript published in 2015 outlines the Q-type ZFPs in Brassica oleracea [24] using the Bolbase genome, which was the only genome available at the time [20]. Only 25 Q-type ZFPs were identified and the protein sequences fell into two groups G1 and G2. About the same time, another manuscript was published by Parkin et al. [28] analyzing the transcriptome and methylome of B. oleracea and the data made available to Ensembl Plants ( Using this additional dataset 12 extra ZFPs were identified and used in this analysis of Brassica ZFPs. The G1 group contains mostly 2i-C type ZFPs with only one 2i-B and one 2i-A. The G2 group contains only 2i-D ZFPs. Therefore, the G1 group is biased towards 2i-C motifs. Therefore the additional dataset enhances the number of 2i-A and 2i-B type BoZFPs.

Expression of Brassica oleracea and napus transcripts

The NCBI SRA (sequence read archive) database,, was queried to confirm that the B. oleracea genes were indeed transcribed (Table 3). Examination of four BioProjects using either B. oleracea var. capitata or italica containing a total of 22 different samples provide evidence that transcript for 35 of 37 Q-type C2H2 ZFPs were present in at least one tissue type. Only BoZFP1 and BoZFP15 transcription could not be verified. Considering that these genes are often induced by stress, perhaps there is no experiment in the NCBI SRA database yet that uses the appropriate conditions to induce their expression.
Table 3

B. oleracea Q-type C2H2 TF transcript length and expression




Transcription Notesb,c



cannot find transcript info for this gene




found EAR motif in club root SRR but there is a gap between 112-132




locus_18655, bud SRR630928 1–643 100% ID, seedling 102043,7–637, SNPs at 207, 537 and 541




bud and flower, missing 1–47 in bud with gap at 793–815, or 1–168 in flower up to 1100




locus_27313, 2–746 with gap at 273–277




locus_29791 in seedling 102043, 5–775




bud missing 1–66 bases, SNP at 372




102043 flower has most of the transcript seedling is missing L-box




locus_24740 and 40724, seedling 102043, 10 SNPs, 13–677




locus_9351 stem also found in stem of 2, 1–824




flower with gap at 344–357








107140 leaf 100% ID, flower of 2 is 1–763 and bud is 7–772 with a gap 672–683




locus_2060, seedling 107140, 1–718 SNP at 492, in 102043 find gap at ~ 450–550




cannot find this transcript




seedling 102043, 2–670




102043 seedling




102043 complete coverage of entire transcript




leaf of 107140 and flower of 2 covering 1–878




102043 flower 2–841 includes the EAR motif




102043 seedling 3–447 only 1 SNP found




102043 seedling




C1220 clubroot resistant, 1–717 with gap 327–352 and SNPs 173, 213, 471, 503, 653. 1–400 bases no gap or SNPs in 7 day cotyledon of broccoli




bud of SRR630928




seedling 102043, 14–684




locus_47213, seedling 102043




clubroot resistant 27–862, gap 604–639




107140 seedling




seedling 102043








flower M? Does not seem to coincide with map




96–618, 635–750 of 777 in bud does have 2ZFPs and EAR motif maybe even L-box.




locus_45812, stem 12–696 100% ID, leaf of 107140, 1–672




102043 seedling great coverage 100% 3–480 of 486




locus_43474 in bud 6–971 100% ID SRR630928, 102043 seedling, 1–893, 17 SNPs and a 3 base gap




locus_43800, leaf




locus_ 26577, seedling 102043, 5–794

aLength of transcript in Ensembl Plants

or Bolbase

bSRA (sequence read archive) data on the B. oleracea transcriptome 1) SRP032830; 9d old seedlings of the cabbage cultivars 102043 and 107140. Flowers were isolated from 102043 and leaf and root tissue were isolated from 107140. Loci were identified for 35,274 genes and presented in Kim et al. [34] Additional file 1: Table S1. 2) SRP017530; 7 week old plants isolated 7 different organs. 3) SRP029141; line C1220 clubroot disease resistant cabbage. 4) SRP034015; germinating broccoli

clocus # from Kim et al. [34] Additional file 1: Table S1, organ and/or cultivar and sequence ID = 100% unless noted otherwise

B. napus contains two times the number of Q-type ZFPs in comparison with B. oleracea and B. rapa. Considering the similarity to the genes in the diploid genomes, expression of these genes in B. napus was determined using previously published RNA-Seq data (see Additional file 4). B. napus genes were divided into groups based on the similarity to the18 Arabidopsis two fingered ZFPs. Given how similar the protein paralogs can be, the transcripts were aligned and the SRA results were mapped onto the alignments, so that differences between paralogs could be easily identified and the unique transcript verified. The reads for the SRA experiments were typically 101 nucleotides and generally abundant enough to identify unique differences between the different genes (see Additional file 4). The transcript alignments begin at the predicted start site and end at the predicted stop codon. Different groups of ZFPs had different size transcripts with 2i-A and B genes containing 447 to 615 nucleotides and 2i-C 798 to 1155 bases. The differences between paralogs varied from four to seven substitutions in Zat17-like transcripts to 31 to 130 in Zat5-like genes (see Additional file 4). Generally, SRA coverage could be found in the roots, leaves or flower buds (see Additional file 4 Table 1). Three genes BnaAZFP7, BnaCZFP12 and BnaCZFP17 did not have adequate SRA coverage and therefore it is unclear whether these genes are expressed. Only one of four 2i-X genes (BnaCZFP33) could be found in the SRA data examined. At this time, the expression of 2i-X B. napus genes BnaCZFP20, BnaCZFP21 and BnaAZFP31 could not be confirmed. Consequently, the SRA data confirmed that 68 unique B. napus ZFPs were expressed. The SRA data also confirmed that the “introns” predicted in many of the 2i-C genes were retained in the transcript leading to a larger protein than predicted in the database.


While there are 18 2i ZFPs in Arabidopsis, there are 37 in B. oleracea, 35 in rapa and 74 in napus. Given that a whole genome duplication occurred in the Brassica genome ~ 4 million years after its split from the Arabidopsis progenitor, the twofold increase in these ZFPs in diploid Brassicas reflects the whole genome duplication [14]. The B. oleracea and rapa genomes also fused to form B. napus ~ 7500 years ago, and this resulted in doubling again the number of ZFPs [18]. Remarkably, most of these B. napus ZFPs are transcribed (see Additional file 4). Generally, this increase in genes creates an imbalance in gene expression and causes, over time, a reduction in expression of the excess genes. Whether these additional ZFPs have unique niches in expression or interactions with other proteins has yet to be determined.

The two fingered ZFPS of Arabidopsis fall into five groups based on their protein sequences (2i-A-D with outlier X) [3]. Aside from protein sequence similarity it is unclear whether these different phylogenetic groups play a different role in expression or interaction with different proteins. Most ZFPs have been studied one gene at a time and one group does not seem to fall into any specific expression category. ZFPs are often induced by a stress (biotic and/or abiotic) and due to the EAR motif, act to negatively regulate genes that they bind. ZFPs may modulate the stress response by binding activator transcription factors via the zinc fingers while the EAR motif binds to bridging proteins such as TPL or TPL-like proteins in Arabidopsis that subsequently interacts with HDAC proteins such as HDA19. This interaction results in tightening of the DNA region to which the zinc fingers bind [27, 29]. Ectopic expression of ZFPs can lead to an increase in tolerance to specific stresses [5]. In addition, three amino acid changes in the EAR domain of the Arabidopsis ZFP, ZAT7, results in plants with lower salinity tolerance [30]. Thus, the EAR motif is integral to the enhanced tolerance. How the over-expression of a negative regulator results in increased tolerance is also not apparent. OE-Zat18 a 2i-A member enhances drought tolerance [31]. Several other 2i groups of ZFPs enhance salt tolerance when over-expressed such as Zat7 (2i-B) Zat10 and Zat6 (2i-D) [30, 32, 33]. Thus the protein sequence phylogeny of the ZFP may not predict the effect it might have on stress tolerance.

This work identifies ZFPs from three genomes that are related but have diverged over evolutionary time. It is remarkable that the B. napus genome appears to maintain expression of most of the ZFPs from B. oleracea and B. rapa. Identifying the expression pattern of the homologs in the different species may identify niches unique to the different ZFPs. This work is only a beginning, outlining what variation in two fingered Q-type ZFPs exists in these species. Considering the evolution of these species, it seems remarkable that given the minor differences found within the ZFP proteins of the individual Brassica diploids, RNA-Seq data confirms at least 68 of the B. napus genes are expressed. Given the improvements in tolerance to stresses previously identified in ZFPs over-expressed in Arabidopsis [5], manipulation of the Brassica ZFPs may improve stress tolerance in these important agronomic crops.



Brassica napus A genome


Brassica napus C genome


Brassica oleracea


Brassica rapa


ethylene-responsive element-binding factor (ERF)-associated amphiphilic repression


million years ago


National Center for Biotechnology Information


Sequence read archive


Q-type C2H2 zinc finger proteins



We thank Ms. Laura Vanderploeg for drawing chromosome maps and Dr. Michael Blackburn for revising the phylogenetic tree. We also thank Dr. Blackburn and Dr. Robert Harrison for valuable feedback on the manuscript.


This work was funding by USDA-Agricultural Research Service 8042–22000–288-00-D.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Authors’ contributions

SDL Perceived of the project, analyzed the data, wrote the manuscript. NGN designed the figures for the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Invasive Insect Biocontrol and Behavior Lab, USDA-ARS, 10300 Baltimore Ave., BARC-West Bldg 007, Rm 301, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA


  1. Takatsuji H, Mori M, Benfey PN, Ren L, Chua NH. Characterization of a zinc finger DNA-binding protein expressed specifically in Petunia petals and seedlings. EMBO J. 1992;11:241–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kubo K, Sakamoto A, Kobayashi A, Rybka Z, Kanno Y, Nakagawa H, Takatsuji H. Cys2/His2 zinc-finger protein family of petunia evolution and general mechanism of target-sequence recognition. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:608–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Englbrecht CC, Schoof H, Bohm S. Conservation, diversification and expansion of C2H2 zinc finger proteins in the Arabidopsis thaliana genome. BMC Genomics. 2004;5:39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. The zinc finger network of plants. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:1150–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kielbowicz-Matuk A. Involvement of plant C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factors in stress responses. Plant Sci. 2012;185:78–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M. Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1959–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Sakamoto H, Maruyama K, Sakuma Y, Meshi T, Iwabuchi M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Arabidopsis Cys2/His2-type zinc-finger proteins function as transcription repressors under drought, cold, and high-salinity stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 2004;136:2734–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Agarwal P, Arora R, Ray S, Singh AK, Singh VP, Takatsuji H, Kapoor S, Tyagi AK. Genome-wide identification of C2H2 zinc-finger gene family in rice and their phylogeny and expression analysis. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;65(4):467–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Muthamilarasan M, Bonthala VS, Mishra AK, Khandelwal R, Khan Y, Roy R, Prasad M. C2H2 type of zinc finger transcription factors in foxtail millet define response to abiotic stresses. Funct Integr Genomics. 2014;14(3):531–43. ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Q, Wang Z, Xu X, Zhang H, Li C. Genome-wide analysis of C2H2 zinc-finger family transcription factors and their responses to abiotic stresses in poplar (Populus trichocarpa). PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134753. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Malik AB, Ashraf N. Transcriptome wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiling of zinc-finger transcription factors from Crocus sativus L. Mol Gen Genomics. 2017;292:619–33. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gourcilleau D, Lenne C, Armenise C, Moulia B, Julien J-L, Bronner G, Leblanc-Fournier N. Phylogenetic study of plant Q-type C2H2 zinc finger proteins and expression analysis of poplar genes in response to osmotic, cold and mechanical stresses. DNA Res. 2011;18(2):77–92. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheuk A, Houde M. Genome wide identification of C1-2i zinc finger proteins and their response to abiotic stress in hexaploid wheat. Mol Gen Genomics. 2016;291(2):873–90. ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Yu J, Tehrim S, Zhang F, Tong C, Huang J, Cheng X, Dong C, Zhou Y, Qin R, Hua W, Liu S. Genome-wide comparative analysis of NBS-encoding genes between Brassica species and Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schranz ME, Lysak MA, Mitchell-Olds T. The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11(11):535–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang X, et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet. 2011;43(10):1035–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lui, et al. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3930.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chalhoub, et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oil seed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagaharu U. Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese. J Botany. 1935;7:389–452.Google Scholar
  20. Yu J, Zhao M, Wang X, Tong C, Huang S, Tehrim S, Liu Y, Hua W, Liu S. Bolbase: a comprehensive genomics database for Brassica oleracea. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:664.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992;8:275–82.Google Scholar
  22. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1984;39:783–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawrence SD, Novak NG. Mining the Brassica oleracea genome for Q-type C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor genes. Plant Mol Biol Reports. 2015;33(5):1611–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. He Z, Cheng F, Li Y, Wang X, Parkin IA, Chalhoub B, Liu S, Bancroft I. Construction of Brassica a and C genome-based ordered pan-transcriptomes for use in rapeseed genomic research. Data Brief. 2015;4:357–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Takatsuji H. Zinc-finger proteins: the classical zinc finger emerges in contemporary plant science. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;39:1073–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kagale S, Rozwadowski K. EAR motif-mediated transcriptional repression in plants. An underlying mechanism for epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Epigenetics. 2011;6(2):141–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Parkin IA, et al. Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea. Genome Biol. 2014;15(6):R77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Causier B, Ashworth M, Guo W, Davies B. The TOPLESS Interactome: a framework for gene repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012;158:423–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Morsy MR, Song L, Coutu A, Krizek BA, Lewis MW, Warren D, Cushman J, Connolly EL, Mittler R. The EAR-motif of the Cys2/His2-type zinc finger protein Zat7 plays a key role in the defense response of Arabidopsis to salinity stress. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:9260–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yin M, Wang Y, Zhang L, Li J, Quan W, Yang L, Wang Q, Chan Z. The Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc finger transcription factor ZAT18 is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(11):2991–3005.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mittler R, Kim Y, Song L, Coutu J, Coutu A, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Lee H, Stevenson B, Zhu JK. Gain- and loss-of-function mutations in Zat10 enhance the tolerance of plants to abiotic stress. FEBS Lett. 2006;580(28–29):6537–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Shi H, Wang X, Ye T, Chen F, Deng J, Yang P, Zhang Y, Chan Z. The Cysteine2/Histidine2-type transcription factor ZINC FINGER OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA6 modulates biotic and abiotic stress responses by activating salicylic acid-related genes and C-REPEAT-BINDING FACTOR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(3):1367–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim HA, Lim CJ, Kim S, Choe JK, Jo S-H, Baek N, Kwon S-Y. High-throughput sequencing and De Novo assembly of Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. for transcriptome analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92087.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2018