Skip to main content

Upregulation of CENPM is associated with poor clinical outcome and suppression of immune profile in clear cell renal cell carcinoma



The response of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) to immunotherapy is still not durable, suggesting that the immune landscape of ccRCC still needs to be refined, especially as some molecules that have synergistic effects with immune checkpoint genes need to be explored.


The expression levels of CENPM and its relationship with clinicopathological features were explored using the ccRCC dataset from TCGA and GEO databases. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis was performed to validate the expression of CENPM in renal cancer cell lines. Kaplan-Meier analysis, COX regression analysis and Nomogram construction were used to systematically evaluate the prognostic potential of CENPM in ccRCC. Besides, single gene correlation analysis, protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, genetic ontology (GO), kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were used to predict the biological behaviour of CENPM and the possible signalling pathways involved. Finally, a comprehensive analysis of the crosstalk between CENPM and immune features in the tumor microenvironment was performed based on the ssGSEA algorithm, the tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithm, the TIMER2.0 database and the TISIDB database.


CENPM was significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues and renal cancer cell lines and was closely associated with poor clinicopathological features and prognosis. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that CENPM may be involved in the regulation of the cell cycle in ccRCC and may have some crosstalk with the immune microenvironment in tumors. The ssGSEA algorithm, CIBERSOPT algorithm suggests that CENPM is associated with suppressor immune cells in ccRCC such as regulatory T cells. The ssGSEA algorithm, CIBERSOPT algorithm suggests that CENPM is associated with suppressor immune cells in ccRCC such as regulatory T cells. Furthermore, the TISIDB database provides evidence that not only CENPM is positively associated with immune checkpoint genes such as CTLA4, PDCD1, LAG3, TIGIT, but also chemokines and receptors (such as CCL5, CXCL13, CXCR3, CXCR5) may be responsible for the malignant phenotype of CENPM in ccRCC. Meanwhile, predictions based on the TIDE algorithm support that patients with high CENPM expression have a worse response to immunotherapy.


The upregulation of CENPM in ccRCC predicts a poor clinical outcome, and this malignant phenotype may be associated with its exacerbation of the immunosuppressive state in the tumor microenvironment.


Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a cancer that originates in the renal epithelium and includes more than 10 histological and molecular subtypes, of which clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is the most common [1]. Although patients with early stage ccRCC can be cured radically by surgical or ablative strategies, approximately one third will eventually develop metastatic disease [2]. There is no doubt that advanced ccRCC relies heavily on systemic therapy, and in particular immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) -based strategies have emerged as a first-line treatment option [3]. However, despite the encouraging success of ICIs, resistance to these drugs has limited the number of patients who can achieve durable responses [4]. Indeed, this is currently the greatest challenge for immunotherapy in ccRCC. The molecular landscape associated with immune checkpoints in ccRCC therefore needs to be continually refined to help us better understand the molecular crosstalk in the tumor immune microenvironment.

Centromere protein M (CENPM), also known as proliferation-associated nuclear element 1 (PANE1), was originally detected in mouse mammary epithelial cells [5]. It not only affects the cell cycle by regulating chromosome segregation during cell division, but also encodes a new histocompatibility antigen in B lymphocytes that is involved in the immune response [6, 7]. Furthermore, the upregulation of CENPM in human cancer tissues has been found to be associated with certain malignant phenotypes. For instance, upregulation of CENPM expression can promote hepatocarcinogenesis through a variety of mechanisms, and also to some extent influence the progression of pancreatic as well as lung adenocarcinoma [8,9,10]. At the same time, several other genes of the centromere protein family have been found to be closely associated with tumor development, such as CENPA [11], CENPE [12], and CENPF [13]. Clearly, this also supports the link between CENPM and cancer aggressiveness to a certain extent.

Intriguingly, with the help of RNA sequencing data from the TCGA database, we found that the mRNA expression of CENPM was significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissue. However, whether it has some effect on the malignant behaviour of ccRCC or on the survival outcome of patients remains unclear. Here, therefore, we first validated the upregulation of CENPM through other public datasets and renal cancer cell lines, and then analysed the association of its expression with the prognosis of ccRCC patients. Further, with the help of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), we explored its potential pathway of action in ccRCC.


Access to RNA sequencing data and clinical information

RNA sequencing data were downloaded from the TCGA ( and GEO databases(, which contain paired and unpaired samples. ccRCC patients’ clinicopathological data (age, sex, clinical and pathological stage, histological grading, etc.) and prognostic information were obtained from the TCGA database.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis

After extraction of total RNA from the cell lines (HK-2, 769-P, ACHN and 786-O), reverse transcription and qPCR were performed using cDNA synthesis kits (Qiagen, USA) and SYBR real-time PCR kits (Qiagen, USA) according to the kit’s instructions; quantitative analysis was based on the 2-ΔΔCt method. The primer sequences are as follows: CENPM_F: GCGGACTCGATGCTCAA; CENPM_R: GATTCACACTGGAGGGCAA; the internal reference gene is β-actin.

UALCAN database

UALCAN (2022; is a comprehensive, user-friendly, interactive web resource that allows users to identify biomarkers or perform in silico validation of potential genes of interest [14]. Here, it is used to assess the epigenetic regulation of CENPM expression by promoter methylation.

Nomogram construction and evaluation

Indicators with independent prognostic value screened in multivariate COX analysis were included in the construction of the Nomogram to predict disease-specific survival (DSS) in ccRCC patients at 1, 3 and 5 years; predictive efficacy was evaluated by calibration curves drawn by the “rms “R package.

Protein–protein interaction (PPI)

The top 300 genes most strongly associated with CENPM and differentially expressed genes from the TCGA database (logFC> 1.5) were cross-tabulated and target molecules were subsequently subjected to PPI network construction to find key genes associated with CENPM in ccRCC. PPI networks were constructed in the STRING database (version:11.5; and subsequently imported into Cytoscape (version 3.9.1) for embellishment.

Genetic ontology (GO), Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) and GSEA

Differential genes associated with CENPM were used for GO and KEGG pathway analysis to explore the biological processes that may be involved in CENPM in ccRCC. GSEA has been shown to be a pathway enrichment analysis algorithm that controls type I and type II errors well, leading to widespread use in the processing of multi-omics data [15]. The analysis was performed using the ‘clusterprofiler’ in the R package; normalised enrichment scores (NES) > 1, false discovery rates (FDR) < 0.25 and adjusted p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA) and TIMER 2.0

ssGSEA is an extension of the GSEA method and was originally designed to compensate for the inability to do GSEA on a single sample [16]. TIMER v2.0 ( is also a comprehensive resource that allows users to explore the full range of tumor immunological, clinical and genomic features [17]. In this study, these was used to analyse the correlation between CENPM with the abundance of immune infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor microenvironment.

TISIDB databases

TISIDB ( is a web portal for exploring tumor and immune system interactions that integrates multiple heterogeneous data types [18]. We used this platform to systematically analyse the correlation between CENPM with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemokines in ccRCC.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

The specific steps are consistent with our previous studies [19]. In brief, paraffin sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, placed in sodium citrate and then heated in a microwave for antigen retrieval. Sections were then blocked with 1% BSA and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (anti-CENPM, anti-PD-L1). Subsequently, sections were incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 hour at 37 °C, stained with diaminobenzidine and counterstained with hematoxylin. Finally, images were taken with a Zeiss microscope.

Statistical analyses

All RNA sequencing data were analysed using R software (version 3.6.3). Kaplan-Meier analysis and cox analysis were used to assess the impact of CENPM on survival outcomes in ccRCC patients, and spearman correlation analysis was used to describe the correlation between CENPM expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), immune checkpoint inhibitors, the chemokines, and associated genes, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.


CENPM mRNA expression is upregulated in ccRCC

In view of the cancer-promoting role of CENPM in a variety of human cancers, we performed a pan-cancer analysis of CENPM at the mRNA level through the TCGA database (Fig. 1A). Notably, CENPM was significantly upregulated in ccRCC tissues in both paired and unpaired samples (Fig. 1B-C). To rule out this phenomenon by chance, we confirmed the high expression status of CENPM in ccRCC tissues with four GEO datasets (Fig. 1D-G). Similarly, the up-regulation of CENPM was further confirmed in three renal cancer cell lines (Fig. 1H).

Fig. 1
figure 1

CENPM mRNA expression in ccRCC tissue samples and renal cancer cell lines. (A) Pan-cancer analysis of CENPM. (B-G) RNA sequencing data from TCGA, GSE53757, GSE40435, GSE105261, GSE36895 revealed that CENPM expression was upregulated in ccRCC samples. (H) CENPM expression was upregulated in renal cancer cell lines (769-P, ACHN and 786-O) relative to renal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2). *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001. CENPM, Centromere protein M. ccRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Up-regulation of CENPM may be associated with weaker promoter methylation

It is known that methylation of promoters can often silence gene expression, a property that could also provide a potential target for cancer therapy [20]. Therefore, based on TCGA samples, we investigated the promoter methylation levels of CENPM in ccRCC and normal tissues. The results showed that CENPM methylation levels were significantly lower in ccRCC tissues and that this trend was more pronounced in patients with more advanced pathological staging and higher histological grading (Fig. 2A-C). Also, spearman analysis demonstrated this negative correlation well (Fig. 2D).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Relationship between mRNA expression of CENPM and promoter methylation levels. (A) CENPM has lower promoter methylation levels in ccRCC tissue. (B) Lower methylation levels in ccRCC samples with higher pathological stage. (C) Lower methylation levels in ccRCC samples with worse histological grading. (D) The methylation level of CENPM was negatively correlated with its mRNA expression. CENPM, Centromere protein M. ccRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

CENPM is associated with a more aggressive clinical profile

On the basis of the upregulation of CENPM expression in ccRCC, we then explored the correspondence between its expression and clinicopathological features. As expected, CENPM expression was independent of patient age and gender, and was significantly higher in patients with more advanced clinicopathological staging, higher histological grading (Fuhrman grade) and in those who had a fatal event (Fig. 3A-I). with this evidence, we hypothesize that CENPM may be associated with the malignant phenotype of ccRCC and is detrimental to patient survival outcomes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between CENPM mRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics. Up-regulation of expression was observed in patients with high T-stage (A), lymph node metastasis (B), distant metastasis (C), high pathological stage (F), high histological grade (G) and the occurrence of fatal events (H-I); while there was no significant correlation with gender (D) and age (E). *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001. CENPM, Centromere protein M

The potential of CENPM as a biomarker

As CENPM was differentially expressed in kidney cancer samples and paraneoplastic samples, we demonstrated the effect of high CENPM expression on survival outcome in ccRCC patients by means of Kaplan-Meier curves, and the results revealed that CENPM upregulation was strongly associated with worsening overall survival (OS), DSS and progression-free interval (PFI) (Fig. 4A-C). Meanwhile, we then implemented univariate (Fig. 4D) and multivariate (Fig. 4E) cox regression analyses and further confirmed that CENPM could be an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC. Furthermore, based on the results of the cox analysis, we further constructed Nomogram to predict 1, 3 and 5 year DSS in ccRCC patients (Fig. 4F). The C-index for evaluating its predictive efficacy was 0.803 and the calibration curve visually demonstrates the reliability of the model (Fig. 4G-I).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of CENPM in ccRCC. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that ccRCC patients with upregulated CENPM expression had significantly shorter OS (A), DSS (B) and PFI (C). Univariate (D) and multivariate (E) COX regression analyses identified CENPM as an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC patients. (F-I) Nomograms and their calibration curves constructed on the basis of independent prognostic factors in ccRCC. CENPM, Centromere protein M. OS, overall survival. DSS, disease-specific survival. PFI, progression-free interval. ccRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Exploring the potential mechanisms of CENPM in ccRCC

By correlation analysis, we obtained the top 300 genes most associated with CENPM, and the top 20 molecules were shown by heat map in Fig. 5A. 109 of the 300 genes were differentially expressed in ccRCC (Fig. 5B), and the PPI network of these genes is shown in Fig. 5C. Based on the centrality of the nodes, we found that CCNA2, CDC20, AURKB, ASPM, BUB1, TOP2A, and CCNB2 are perhaps the most critical molecules associated with CENPM in ccRCC. In addition, based on these target genes, we performed GO and KEGG analyses, which showed that CENPM may be associated with cell division and the cell cycle in ccRCC (Fig. 5D-E). Clearly, this is similar to the findings of previous studies [6]. In parallel, we performed a potential pathway exploration through GSEA. As shown in Supplemental Fig. 1, interleukin signalling, immunomodulatory interactions between lymphocytes and non-lymphoid cells, B-cell receptor signalling, interferon signalling, cytokine-receptor interactions, cell cycle, MAPK signalling pathways, and chemokine signalling pathways were significantly enriched.

Fig. 5
figure 5

CENPM correlation gene analysis, PPI network construction, GO and KEGG analysis. (A) The top 20 most relevant genes for CENPM. (B) Intersection of related genes in CENPM and differential genes in ccRCC. (C) PPI network of differential genes associated with CENPM. GO (D) and KEGG (E) analysis based on CENPM-associated differential genes. PPI, Protein–protein interaction. CENPM, Centromere protein M. DEGs: differentially expressed genes. ccRCC, Clear cell renal cell carcinoma. GO, Gene Ontology. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

Crosstalk between CENPM and the immune microenvironment

Given that the GSEA results suggest that CENPM may be associated with immune infiltration in ccRCC, we first analysed the crosstalk between CENPM and TILs. Based on the ssGSEA algorithm, we found that CENPM was positively correlated with Th2 cells, T cells, T cell follicular helper, T regulatory cells, etc. (Fig. 6A). On the other hand, using the CIBERSOPT algorithm in the TIMER database, we also found that CENPM was positively correlated with activated NK cells, T cell follicular helper, T regulatory cells, and CD8+ T cells, while there was no significant correlation with CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6B). Notably, when activated NK cells, T cell follicular helper, and T regulatory cells were enriched, the OS of ccRCC patients deteriorated significantly (Fig. 6C). Taking the above information together, it is reasonable to speculate that the pro-cancer effect of CENPM may be correlated to some extent with the enrichment of unfavourable TILs.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Correlation of CENPM mRNA expression with TILs in ccRCC. (A) TILs associated with CENPM are shown based on the ssGSEA algorithm. (B) TILs associated with CENPM are demonstrated based on the CIBERSORT algorithm. (C) Enrichment of activated NK cells, regulatory T cells and T cell follicular helpers was associated with poor OS. CENPM, Centromere protein M. TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma. OS, overall survival

Immune checkpoints play a crucial role in the immune microenvironment in ccRCC, where they directly regulate the host’s anti-tumor immune response [21]. In this context, we have analysed the correlation between CENPM and Immunoinhibitor (Fig. 7A). Intriguingly, CENPM was significantly positively correlated with CTLA4, PDCD1, TIGIT and LAG3 (Fig. 7B), molecules that have been shown to be key immunotherapeutic targets in ccRCC [3]. The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithms are widely used to predict cancer immunotherapy response, with higher TIDE scores implying poorer immunotherapy outcomes [22]. As shown in Fig. 7C, the TIDE score was significantly higher and the immunotherapy response rate was significantly lower for those with high CENPM expression compared to those with low expression. Finally, the correlation of CENPM with chemokines and chemokine receptors is shown in the radar plot, where molecules such as CCL5, CXCL13, CXCR3, CXCR5 were found to be most relevant to CENPM in ccRCC (Fig. 7D).

Fig. 7
figure 7

CENPM in relation to immune checkpoint genes, immunotherapy, chemokines and chemokine receptors in ccRCC. (A) CENPM is associated with multiple immune checkpoint genes in human cancers. (B) CENPM was positively correlated with CTLA4, PDCD1, TIGIT and LAG3. (C) Predictions based on the TIDE algorithm suggest that patients with high CENPM expression have a lower response rate to immunotherapy. (D) CENPM was positively correlated with CCL5, CXCL13, CXCR3, CXCR5, etc. ****, p < 0.0001. CENPM, Centromere protein M. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma. TIDE, tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion

Preliminary validation based on IHC

Given that the previous bioinformatics analysis revealed the good prognostic value of CENPM in ccRCC, we validated the expression of CENPM at the protein level using IHC. As shown in Fig. 8A, the expression of CENPM in ccRCC tissues was similarly higher than in normal paracancerous tissues, both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus. In addition, we examined the expression of PD-L1 in ccRCC tissues considering the immunosuppressive properties of CENPM in ccRCC. Consistent with this, PD-L1 expression levels were also significantly higher in ccRCC tissues than in normal kidney tissues (Fig. 8B).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Protein expression levels of CENPM and PD-L1 in ccRCC tissues. (A) IHC staining of CENPM in ccRCC tissue and normal kidney tissue. (B) IHC staining of PD-L1 in ccRCC tissue and normal kidney tissue. CENPM, Centromere protein M. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma. IHC, Immunohistochemistry


Centromere are regions of chromosomes that act as chromosome attachment sites for spindle microtubules in dividing cells and guide chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosi s[23]. Centromere protein (CENP) has been identified as an autoantibody target in human disease and autoantibodies against CENPA, CENPB and CENPC have been considered relatively specific biomarkers for calcinosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasia (CREST) syndrome [24]. In recent years, evidence for the CENP family in human cancers has been presented, including lung, breast, prostate and kidney cancers [11, 25,26,27]. CENPM, a component of the CENPA-nucleosome associated complex, has also been reported to be associated with liver and pancreatic cancers [8, 9]. Here, we found by bioinformatics analysis that CENPM expression was upregulated in ccRCC samples, had satisfactory diagnostic efficacy for ccRCC and was associated with worsening OS, DSS and PFI in patients. Clearly, these findings are similar to those reported in previous studies, implying that CENPM may be a promising biomarker for ccRCC.

Molecular crosstalk in the tumor microenvironment of ccRCC is known to be a complex network. In this study, we revealed some key proteins that may be closely related to CENPM by correlation analysis and PPI network construction, including: CCNA2, CCNB2, CDC20, AURKB, ASPM, BUB1 and TOP2A. Interestingly, these molecules have been shown to be associated with the malignant phenotype and poor prognosis of ccRCC in past studies [28,29,30,31]. Not only does this evidence provide a potential regulatory network, it also seems to indirectly validate the malignant function of CENPM in ccRCC.

Similar to other members of the CENP family, CENPM is thought to be involved in the regulation of cell division and the cell cycle [6]. In this paper, the results of GO, KEGG and GSEA also confirm, at least in part, the applicability of this property of CENPM in ccRCC. On the other hand, GSEA also reveals the relevance of CENPM to the immune infiltration profile in ccRCC. Indeed, in ccRCC patients, NK cell infiltration in the circulation and tumour was found to be strongly associated with an immunosuppressive phenotype [32, 33]. Regulatory T cells are one of the major immunosuppressive cell types in malignancies and a potential target for immunotherapy [34]. However, our study found that CENPM was positively correlated with these cells, highlighting the immunosuppressive phenotype to some extent. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the enrichment of T-cell follicular helpers in ccRCC correlates with a worsening of OS (Fig. 7C), which appears to be diametrically opposed to their function in other cancers [35].

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the first-line treatment option for advanced ccRCC. The classical immune checkpoint inhibitors target PD-1, PDL-1 and CTLA4, while LAG3 and TIGIT are emerging promising targets [3]. Encouragingly, our study shows that CENPM positively correlates with key immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4, PD-1, TIGIT and LAG3 in ccRCC. And, the IHC results also tentatively validated this correlation (Fig. 8). This evidence predicts that CENPM may act synergistically with immune checkpoints to exacerbate the immunosuppressive state in the tumor microenvironment. Also, the TIDE score suggests lower immunotherapy response rates in patients in the CENPM high expression group. Therefore, given this evidence, combined blockade of CENPM and classical immune checkpoints may be a feasible therapeutic strategy for ccRCC in the foreseeable future.

Macrophage-derived CCL5 has been found to promote immune escape from cancer, and its co-blockade with PD-L1 enhances the anti-tumor immune response [36, 37]. In parallel, infiltration of CXCL13 CD8 + T cells in tumors may determine poor clinical outcome and immune depletion in ccRCC patients [38]. Furthermore, CXCL13 can promote ccRCC cell proliferation and migration by binding to CXCR5 and activating the PI3K/ AKT / mTOR signalling pathway [39]. CXCR3 and its ligand expression levels are also associated with prognosis, metastatic risk and tumour growth in ccRCC patients [40]. However, CENPM showed a strong correlation with these molecules, implying that its crosstalk with chemokines in tumors may also be one of the contributing factors to their malignant phenotype.

Finally, despite the systematic exploration of the prognostic value of CENPM and its relationship with the immunosuppressive phenotype in this study in ccRCC, there are still some shortcomings that need to be raised. Firstly, this study was primarily bioinformatics-based, with experimental validation limited to CENPM expression measurements at the mRNA and protein levels. Secondly, although we constructed a Nomogram to predict DSS in patients based on multiple independent prognostic factors, external validation of this could not be performed due to the lack of available datasets.


Here, the first systematic evidence for CENPM in ccRCC is presented; its expression is upregulated in ccRCC and predicts a poor clinical outcome. Furthermore, CENPM expression was positively correlated with suppressive TILs, immune checkpoints, and chemokines; its crosstalk with these factors may contribute, at least in part, to the malignant phenotype in ccRCC.

Availability of data and materials

RNA-seq and clinical information for ccRCC patients are available from both the TCGA database ( and the GEO database (



Centromere protein M


clear cell renal cell carcinoma


The Cancer Genome Atlas


Gene Expression Omnibus


Gene ontology


Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes


gene set enrichment analysis


tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes


overall survival


disease-specific survival


progression-free interval


tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion




  1. Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jonasch E, Gao J, Rathmell WK. Renal cell carcinoma. BMJ. 2014;349:g4797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu YF, Zhang ZC, Wang SY, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review. Int Immunopharmacol. 2022;110:108900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of Cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 2021;16:223–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Renou JP, Bierie B, Miyoshi K, et al. Identification of genes differentially expressed in mouse mammary epithelium transformed by an activated beta-catenin. Oncogene. 2003;22(29):4594–610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Foltz DR, Jansen LE, Black BE, et al. The human CENP-A centromeric nucleosome-associated complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(5):458–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brickner AG, Evans AM, Mito JK, et al. The PANE1 gene encodes a novel human minor histocompatibility antigen that is selectively expressed in B-lymphoid cells and B-CLL. Blood. 2006;107(9):3779–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao Y, Najeeb RM, Ma D, et al. Upregulation of CENPM promotes hepatocarcinogenesis through mutiple mechanisms. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng C, Zhang T, Li D, et al. Upregulation of CENPM facilitates tumor metastasis via the mTOR/p70S6K signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer. Oncol Rep. 2020;44(3):1003–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu C, Wang Y, Dao Y, et al. Upregulation of CENPM facilitates lung adenocarcinoma progression via PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin Shanghai. 2022;54(1):99–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Q, Xu J, Xiong Z, et al. CENPA promotes clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression and metastasis via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang Y, Ahmed M, Guo H, et al. LSD1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming drives CENPE expression and prostate Cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2017;77(20):5479–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang YG, Li D, Wang L, et al. CENPF/CDK1 signaling pathway enhances the progression of adrenocortical carcinoma by regulating the G2/M-phase cell cycle. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chandrashekar DS, Karthikeyan SK, Korla PK, et al. UALCAN: an update to the integrated cancer data analysis platform. Neoplasia. 2022;25:18–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Canzler S, Hackermüller J. multiGSEA: a GSEA-based pathway enrichment analysis for multi-omics data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020;21(1):561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature. 2009;462(7269):108–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li T, Fu J, Zeng Z, et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(W1):W509–w514.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ru B, Wong CN, Tong Y, et al. TISIDB: an integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2019;35(20):4200–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie W, Xi P, Liu Y, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value and immune infiltration of low expression DBT in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1002588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang X, Han H, De Carvalho DD, et al. Gene body methylation can alter gene expression and is a therapeutic target in cancer. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(4):577–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miao D, Margolis CA, Gao W et al (2018) Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Science (New York, NY) 359 (6377):801-806.:

  22. Jiang P, Gu S, Pan D, et al. Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response. Nat Med. 2018;24(10):1550–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(1):16–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fritzler MJ, Rattner JB, Luft LM, et al. Historical perspectives on the discovery and elucidation of autoantibodies to centromere proteins (CENP) and the emerging importance of antibodies to CENP-F. Autoimmun Rev. 2011;10(4):194–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saha AK, Contreras-Galindo R, Niknafs YS, et al. The role of the histone H3 variant CENPA in prostate cancer. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(25):8537–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu WT, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al. A novel strategy of integrated microarray analysis identifies CENPA, CDK1 and CDC20 as a cluster of diagnostic biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2018;425:43–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang YC, Su Q, Liu YJ, et al. Centromere protein a (CENPA) regulates metabolic reprogramming in the Colon Cancer cells by transcriptionally activating Karyopherin subunit alpha 2 (KPNA2). Am J Pathol. 2021;191(12):2117–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan B, Huang Y, Liu B, et al. AURKB: a promising biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sekino Y, Han X, Kobayashi G, et al. BUB1B overexpression is an independent prognostic marker and associated with CD44, p53, and PD-L1 in renal cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2021;99(4):240–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Deng T, Liu Y, Zhuang J, et al. ASPM is a prognostic biomarker and correlates with immune infiltration in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma and liver hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:632042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang A, Zhou Y, Gong W, et al. CCNA2 as an immunological biomarker encompassing tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response in multiple Cancer types. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5910575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ziblat A, Iraolagoitia XLR, Nuñez SY, et al. Circulating and tumor-infiltrating NK cells from clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients exhibit a predominantly inhibitory phenotype characterized by overexpression of CD85j, CD45, CD48 and PD-1. Front Immunol. 2021;12:681615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sierra JM, Secchiari F, Nuñez SY, et al. Tumor-experienced human NK cells express high levels of PD-L1 and inhibit CD8(+) T cell proliferation. Front Immunol. 2021;12:745939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim MC, Borcherding N, Ahmed KK, et al. CD177 modulates the function and homeostasis of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5764.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Crotty S. T follicular helper cell biology: a decade of discovery and diseases. Immunity. 2019;50(5):1132–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu C, Yao Z, Wang J, et al. Macrophage-derived CCL5 facilitates immune escape of colorectal cancer cells via the p65/STAT3-CSN5-PD-L1 pathway. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(6):1765–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang X, Li X, Wei X, et al. PD-L1 is a direct target of cancer-FOXP3 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and combined immunotherapy with antibodies against PD-L1 and CCL5 is effective in the treatment of PDAC. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dai S, Zeng H, Liu Z, et al. Intratumoral CXCL13(+)CD8(+)T cell infiltration determines poor clinical outcomes and immunoevasive contexture in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(2).

  39. Zheng Z, Cai Y, Chen H, et al. CXCL13/CXCR5 Axis predicts poor prognosis and promotes progression through PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2018;8:682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gudowska-Sawczuk M, Kudelski J, Mroczko B. The role of chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligands in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(22).

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by the Science and Technology Plan Project of Jiangxi Provincial Health and Health Commission (202130209).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZZ, LY and PX designed the research study. LY, PX and NY took responsibility for statistical analyses. ZZ wrote the manuscript. TS and GB evaluated and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin-Bin Gong.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Approval no: (2022) CDYFYYLK (10-011).

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this study.

Competing interests

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplemental Fig. 1. Enrichment plots from GSEA. (A) Interleukin signalling pathway. (B) cell surface Interactions at the vessel wall. (C) immunomodulatory interactions between lymphocytes and non-lymphoid cells. (D) B-cell receptor signalling. (E) interferon signalling. (F) cytokine-receptor interactions. (G) MAPK signalling pathways. (H) chemokine signalling pathways. (I) cell cycle. GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, ZC., Liu, YF., Xi, P. et al. Upregulation of CENPM is associated with poor clinical outcome and suppression of immune profile in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Hereditas 160, 1 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Centromere protein M
  • Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
  • Poor prognosis
  • Immune suppression