- Open Access
Profiling of the germline mutation BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs in a large cohort of Han Chinese breast cancer
Hereditas volume 157, Article number: 1 (2020)
Breast cancer is a one of the malignant carcinomas partially caused by genetic risk factors. Germline BRCA1 gene mutations are reportedly associated with breast cancers. Identification of BRCA1 mutations greatly improves the preventive strategies and management of breast cancer. The aim of our study was to investigate the frequency of the deleterious BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in breast carcinomas, as well as the correlation between p.Ile1845fs variant with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes.
A total of 23,481 clinically high-risk patients with breast cancer and 6489 healthy controls were recruited for p.Ile1845fs variant sequencing (either sanger or next generation sequencing). We identified 94 breast cancer patients (0.40%, 94/23481) as well as 11 healthy controls (0.17%, 11/6489) carried p.Ile1845fs variant. BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed a higher frequency in patients with TNBC molecular typing (20.21%, 19/94) and family history (37.23%, 35/94) compared with non-carriers (P = 3.62E-6 and 0.034, respectively). According to our data, we advanced the frequency of p.Ile1845fs variant and we confirmed that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.26–4.89, P = 0.004).
BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was a frequently pathogenic mutation in breast cancer in Han Chinese women and our data may be helpful for diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer.
Breast cancer is a leading health concern among women worldwide, with approximately 252,710 women newly diagnosed cases occurring every year in the world [1, 2]. In the past few years, the rates of mortality have decreased as a result of recent advancements in the understanding of breast cancer biology. However, breast cancer still keeps up with the leading cause of death in women and metastases at distant sites are still responsible for majority of the cancer death . The genetic architecture of breast cancer involves germline pathogenic variants in high and moderate-risk genes, including BRCA1 and BRCA2. Breast cancers is the most frequent cancer in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers. Recently, studies showed BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants carriers have a 72 and 69% cumulative risk up to age 80, respectively [4, 5]. Therefore, identifying more prognostic markers is required to screen high risk patients and it is significant for the development of effective therapeutic strategies.
Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) is a large gene with 23 exons located on chromosome 17q12.21. It plays as a tumor suppressor that is essential for maintenance of genome stability and DNA repair . The most common mutation types of BRCA1 are small insertion/deletion frameshift, nonsynonymous truncation, and splice-site alterations [7, 8]. Breast cancer risk based on BRCA1 mutation carrier status will be greatly increased. Understanding the mutational spectra of BRCA1 gene will help carriers to personalize the prevention strategies, including prophylactic mastectomy and salpingo-oopherectomy [9, 10]. The genetic testing for these mutations would directly affect the decisions of carriers and their family members.
In sporadic breast cancer, the frequency and relevance of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant has not been elucidated completely. Therefore, we decided that a comprehensive investigation would be useful to clarify this mutation profiling and prognostic significance in sporadic breast cancer in Han Chinese. In the present study, the frequency of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs mutation and the relationship between the mutation, clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes were evaluated.
Material and methods
A total of 23,481 clinically high-risk breast cancer patients and 6489 healthy controls were recruited at 19 clinical centers in 11 Chinese provinces between 2012 to 2018. Clinicopathological features of the patients, including age, ethnicity, menopausal status, type of tumor, disease stage, lymph nodes and tumor size, were collected. Family history is defined that the breast cancer patients had one or more cancer patients (any kind of cancer) in the first-, second-, or third-degree relatives. The control subjects were hospital-based unrelated healthy individuals with no breast cancer or any other cancers. The written informed consents were signed by all participants. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of all the hospitals involved.
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood specimens using the QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen). DNA were amplified by multiplex-amplicon PCR and libraries were then prepared using protocols recommended by Illumina. The validated DNA libraries were sequenced on an Illumina sequencing system (Illumina HiSeq X10). Read pairs (fastq data) generated from the sequencing system were aligned with reference sequences (BRCA1: NM_007300.3) and processed for variant calling. The pathogenic variant p.Ile1845fs was validated by sanger sequencing, and we successfully validated the mutation results with 100% concordance.
The statistical analysis were performed using the R program (http://www.r-project.org/). Chi Square test or the Fisher exact test were used to analyze the two-group comparisons and the OR and the corresponding 95% CI were estimated. All data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
We analyzed the BRCA1 pathogenic variant, p.Ile1845fs, with breast cancer risk in 23,481 invasive breast cancer cases (46.24 ± 20.11 years) and age-matched 6489 controls (47.33 ± 13.46 years). A total of 94 p.Ile1845fs mutations were identified in 23,481 (0.40%) unselected breast cancer patients and 11 unaffected controls carried p.Ile1845fs mutation (0.17%, 11/6489). In the overall analysis, BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed a higher frequency in breast cancer cases (0.40%) than in controls (0.17%) with a greater than two-fold increased breast cancer risk (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.12–5.34, P = 0.034, Table 1).
We summarized the clinicopathogical characteristics of the 94 patients with BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant and 23,387 non-carriers in Table 2. The mean age of these breast cancer patients was 46.16 years (sd = 9.80). The mean age of these non-carriers was 46.25 years (sd = 15.52). Among the 94 BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers, 44 (46.81%) patients were diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER) negative status. 46 (48.94%) patients were detected with progesterone receptor (PR) negative status. 35 (37.23%) patients presented with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) negative status. 6 (6.38%) patients were classified with Luminal-A molecular typing. 26 (27.66%) patients were classified with Luminal-B molecular typing. 12 (12.77%) patients were classified with HER2 overexpression molecular typing. 19 (20.21%) patients were classified with TNBC (Triple-negative breast cancer) molecular typing. 35 (37.23%) patients had family history. TNBC molecular typing was more frequent in mutation carriers compared with non-carriers (P = 3.62E-6). BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers were more likely to have family history of cancer (P = 0.034).
In this study we investigated the profiling of the BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant in Han Chinese breast cancer. We conducted gene sequencing studies in 23,481 unselected breast cancer cases and 6489 controls and confirmed that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.36, 95%CI = 1.26–4.89, P = 0.004).
BRCA1 is a key factor in the DNA double-strand break repair of other genes that induce human cancers [11, 12]. It plays crucial roles in chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle regulation, and activating DNA repair in response to cellular stress [13, 14]. BRCA1 encodes a 1884-amino-acid-long nuclear protein (NP_009231.2) and is expressed in various tissues including breast tissues. There are more than 1600 known variants in BRCA1 and its pathogenic variants increase the risks of breast cancer [15, 16]. Our genetic data suggested that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs was a risk factor for breast cancer with statistically significant OR of 2.36.
Clinicopathological characteristics of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant showed 44 (46.81%) patients were diagnosed with ER negative status, 46 (48.94%) with PR negative status and 35 (37.23%) with HER2 negative status. Based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status, we found 6 (6.38%) Luminal-A molecular typing patients and 26 (27.66%) Luminal-B molecular typing patients. Luminal A and Luminal B share similarities in prognosis, while Luminal B have lower expression of hormone receptors, higher expression of proliferation markers, and higher histologic grade than luminal A [17, 18]. Triple-negative breast cancer is defined by aggressive clinical behavior and occurs in 10–15% of sporadic breast cancers [19, 20]. There were 19 (20.21%) TNBC molecular typing patients carried p.Ile1845fs variant. Family history of breast or ovarian cancer is a high risk factor for breast cancer and genetic testing is recommend for these patients . Among total 94 BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant carriers, 35 (37.23%) patients had family history.
Recently, more studies focus on effective detection of informative biomarkers for advanced development of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment in breast cancer. Arason A et al. showed the profiling of BRCA1 c.4096 + 3A > G and found 8 heterozygous carriers (0.44%) in 1820 unselected breast cancer cases, and 3 (0.15%) in 1968 healthy controls . BRCA1: p.Val1833Met variant was genotyped among 3531 breast cancer patients and 1558 healthy controls using sanger and next generation sequencing, with 27 (0.77%, 27/3531) carriers in cases while no carriers in controls . Our study accord with a pathogenic BRCA1 mutation: p.Ile1845fs and identified 94 carriers (0.40%) in 23,481 breast cancer patients, and 11 (0.17%, 11/6489) in controls. Our findings add to the current knowledge of BRCA1, which will be of use in clinical genetic counselling.
In summary, we described the frequency of BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs mutation and its clinical aspects in our cohort. We have found that BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant is associated with risk of breast cancer. Further genetic studies and meta-analyses are warranted to derive more precise risk estimates for BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs variant. And such carriers should be counselled accordingly, with clinical recommendations and personalized risk-reductionprimary and secondary cancer prevention strategies.
Availability of data and materials
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1
Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2
Triple-negative breast cancer
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30.
Lega IC, Lipscombe LL. Review: diabetes, obesity and Cancer - pathophysiology and clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31722374. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnz014.
DeSantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, Newman LA, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):438–51.
Mavaddat N, Peock S, Frost D, Ellis S, Platte R, Fineberg E, Evans DG, Izatt L, Eeles RA, Adlard J, et al. Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):812–22.
Kuchenbaecker KB, Hopper JL, Barnes DR, Phillips KA, Mooij TM, Roos-Blom MJ, Jervis S, van Leeuwen FE, Milne RL, Andrieu N, et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Jama. 2017;317(23):2402–16.
SK S, Swamy SN, Premalatha CS, Pallavi VR, Gawari R. Aberrant promoter Hypermethylation of RASSF1a and BRCA1 in circulating cell-free tumor DNA serves as a biomarker of ovarian carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(10):3001–5.
Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J, Roach KC, Mandell J, Lee MK, Ciernikova S, et al. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. Jama. 2006;295(12):1379–88.
Kwong A, Chen J, Shin VY, Ho JC, Law FB, Au CH, Chan TL, Ma ES, Ford JM. The importance of analysis of long-range rearrangement of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in genetic diagnosis of familial breast cancer. Cancer genetics. 2015;208(9):448–54.
Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, Henzen-Logmans SC, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers MB, Bartels CC, Verhoog LC, van den Ouweland AM, Niermeijer MF, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):159–64.
Kwong A, Shin VY, Ho JC, Kang E, Nakamura S, Teo SH, Lee AS, Sng JH, Ginsburg OM, Kurian AW, et al. Comprehensive spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deleterious mutations in breast cancer in Asian countries. J Med Genet. 2016;53(1):15–23.
Daza-Martin M, Densham RM, Morris JR. BRCA1-BARD1: the importance of being in shape. Mol Cell Oncol. 2019;6(6):e1656500.
Bose M, Sachsenweger J, Laurila N, Parplys AC, Willmann J, Jungwirth J, Groth M, Rapakko K, Nieminen P, Friedl TWP, et al. BRCA1 mislocalization leads to aberrant DNA damage response in heterozygous ABRAXAS1 mutation carrier cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2019. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 31630195. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddz252.
Wu Q, Paul A, Su D, Mehmood S, Foo TK, Ochi T, Bunting EL, Xia B, Robinson CV, Wang B, et al. Structure of BRCA1-BRCT/Abraxas complex reveals phosphorylation-dependent BRCT dimerization at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell. 2016;61(3):434–48.
Kurdekar V, Giridharan S, Subbarao J, Nijaguna MB, Periasamy J, Boggaram S, Shivange AV, Sadasivam G, Padigaru M, Potluri V, et al. Structure-guided synthesis and evaluation of small-molecule inhibitors targeting protein-protein interactions of BRCA1 tBRCT domain. ChemMedChem. 2019;14(18):1620–32.
Petrucelli N, Daly MB, Feldman GL. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Genet Med. 2010;12(5):245–59.
Lee A, Moon BI, Kim TH. BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variant breast Cancer: treatment and prevention strategies. Ann Lab Med. 2020;40(2):114–21.
Tran B, Bedard PL. Luminal-B breast cancer and novel therapeutic targets. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):221.
Ades F, Zardavas D, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Pugliano L, Fumagalli D, de Azambuja E, Viale G, Sotiriou C, Piccart M. Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(25):2794–803.
Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–34.
Zurlo G, Liu X, Takada M, Fan C, Simon JM, Ptacek TS, Rodriguez J, von Kriegsheim A, Liu J, Locasale JW, et al. Prolyl hydroxylase substrate adenylosuccinate lyase is an oncogenic driver in triple negative breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5177.
Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens-Alvarado RL, Cannady RS, Pratt-Chapman ML, Edge SB, Jacobs LA, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology breast Cancer survivorship care guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):611–35.
Arason A, Agnarsson BA, Johannesdottir G, Johannsson OT, Hilmarsdottir B, Reynisdottir I, Barkardottir RB. The BRCA1 c.4096+3A>G Variant Displays Classical Characteristics of Pathogenic BRCA1 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancers, But Still Allows Homozygous Viability. Genes. 2019;10(11). PMID: 31683985. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110882.
Papamentzelopoulou M, Apostolou P, Fostira F, Dimitrakakis C, Loutradis D, Fountzilas G, Yannoukakos D, Konstantopoulou I. Prevalence and founder effect of the BRCA1 p.(Val1833Met) variant in the Greek population, with further evidence for pathogenicity and risk modification. Cancer Genet. 2019;237:90–6.
This work was supported by AITA medical research institute. We thank Professor Liu Yun for his English language editing. We are grateful to all the medical institutions in China and the medical association for providing us with cancer incidence data.
This work was supported by grants from AITA medical research institute.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All patients had been signed on the consent form.
Consent for publication
Written informed consents were obtained from patients for publication of their individual details and accompanying images in this manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Y., Zhang, H., Weng, X. et al. Profiling of the germline mutation BRCA1: p.Ile1845fs in a large cohort of Han Chinese breast cancer. Hereditas 157, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-019-0115-7
- Breast cancer