Skip to main content

Adaptation of human skin color in various populations



Skin color is a well-recognized adaptive trait and has been studied extensively in humans. Understanding the genetic basis of adaptation of skin color in various populations has many implications in human evolution and medicine.


Impressive progress has been made recently to identify genes associated with skin color variation in a wide range of geographical and temporal populations. In this review, we discuss what is currently known about the genetics of skin color variation. We enumerated several cases of skin color adaptation in global modern humans and archaic hominins, and illustrated why, when, and how skin color adaptation occurred in different populations. Finally, we provided a summary of the candidate loci associated with pigmentation, which could be a valuable reference for further evolutionary and medical studies.


Previous studies generally indicated a complex genetic mechanism underlying the skin color variation, expanding our understanding of the role of population demographic history and natural selection in shaping genetic and phenotypic diversity in humans. Future work is needed to dissect the genetic architecture of skin color adaptation in numerous ethnic minority groups around the world, which remains relatively obscure compared with that of major continental groups, and to unravel the exact genetic basis of skin color adaptation.


Since modern humans ventured out of Africa ~100,000 years ago, they spread across continents into a variety of habitats, from tropical zones to the arctic, and from lowlands to highlands. During migration, selective pressures in local environments (e.g., the cold climate, hypoxia, and endemic pathogens), together with random drift, have resulted in population-specific genetic variants, which further influenced variable phenotypes, such as lactose tolerance, height, immune system, and metabolic efficiency.

Skin color variation is one of the most striking examples of human phenotypic diversity. It is dominated by melanin, a pigmentation located in the base of the epidermis and produced by melanocytes. Melanin has two forms, pheomelanin (yellow-reddish) and eumelanin (black-brown). The former is mainly accumulated in the light-complexioned people, while the latter is mostly produced in the dark-complexioned people [1,2,3,4,5]. In addition, the number and size of melanin particles differ among individuals, and is even more important than the proportions of the two forms of melanin in the determination of human skin color [5]. Other skin-related factors, e.g., keratin, also contribute to skin color variation [6, 7].

In global populations, skin color is highly correlated with latitude, and fundamentally, the distribution of ultraviolet (UV) radiation (Fig. 1). Populations closer to the equator tend to have dark skin for protection against UV, since overexposure to UV may decrease folic acid levels [8, 9] and cause skin cancer [10,11,12,13]. The lighter skin in populations at higher latitudes is underlying selection to maintain vitamin D photosynthesis, which is a UV-dependent process [14, 15].

Fig. 1

Correlation between skin color and latitude (from Barsh (2003) [5]). (a) A map of human skin color distribution. (b) A plot of skin reflectance against latitude

Although UV has been assumed to be a driving force for the evolution of human skin colors, understanding the exact genetic mechanism of selection would be crucial to reconstruct human evolutionary history and elucidate the microevolution of adaptive traits. Describing a full picture of regional skin color adaptation in humans would be challenging because it includes not only the genes identified to be under selection, but also the extent to which these genes could explain phenotypic variation, the interactions and joint effects of genes, and the way they react to the external environments. In this article, we reviewed several cases of skin color adaptation in various populations of modern humans and archaic hominins. These cases show the similarities and differences of mechanisms of skin color adaptation across populations, and provide some insights into human evolutionary history.

Skin color adaptation in modern Eurasians

In Europeans, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 [16,17,18,19] are two golden genes related to the evolution of the light skin color. SLC24A5 encodes the NCKX5 protein, which is a member of the transmembrane protein family and regulates the calcium concentration in the melanosome [16]. This gene has been confirmed to affect pigmentation in zebrafish and mice [16, 20]. Especially, the derived allele of rs1426654 in SLC24A5 was found to be nearly fixed in Europeans, but almost missing in populations without any European ancestry (Fig. 2) [21]. A 78-kb haplotype around SLC24A5, which is in linkage disequilibrium with rs1426654, was also identified to accumulate in Europeans [22]. A similar pattern can be observed at rs16891982 in SLC45A2 [23], which has been reported to be associated with pigmentation in several species, e.g., mice, fish, birds, and horses [24,25,26]. Other variants in this gene, including rs26722, rs2287949, and rs40132, were also shown to be coloration-associated in Europeans [23, 27, 28]. Another important pigmentation-related gene identified in European is MC1R [29,30,31]. This gene is expressed in melanocytes and plays a key role in controlling the switch from pheomelanin to eumelanin [31]. The pigmentary phenotypes associated with MC1R has been studied in a wide range of animals [32,33,34]. Many variants have been identified in MC1R, such as rs1805007, rs1805008, and rs3212357 [35, 36], despite its small size (951 bp). Other important European-specific loci include rs1393350 in TYR, rs2733831 in TYRP1, and rs1900758 in OCA2 [17, 28, 37,38,39]. The derived allele frequencies at these loci are high in Europeans but low in Africans and East Asians, which could be a clear signal of positive selection in Europeans, as indicated by statistical analysis [40].

Fig. 2

Evolutionary model of human pigmentation in three continental populations. The rooted tree shows the genetic phylogeny of human populations from Africa, North Europe and East Asia, with the colors of the branches roughly indicating the generalized skin pigmetation level of these populations (adapted from McEvoy et al. (2006) [39]). Genetic loci reported to be under positive selection in the common ancestor of modern Eurasians are represented by rs1881227 in KITLG, and those independently evolved in Europeans and East Asians, indicating possible convergent evolution, are represented by rs12913832 in OCA2 and rs885479 in MC1R, respectively. The maps of allele frequency were drawn using R (version 3.2.1,, based on these loci in 53 global populations provided by the Human Genome Diversity Panel CEPH (HGDP, Blue and red colors denote the ancestral and derived alleles, respectively

Genes involved in the skin color adaptation in East Asians are not that well studied compared to the long list of adaptive genes identified in Europeans. Notable examples include OCA2 and MC1R. Each harbors several non-synonymous mutations, e.g. rs1800414 and rs74653330 in OCA2, and rs885479 in MC1R [40,41,42,43], which exhibit high derived allele frequencies in East Asians, but low derived allele frequencies in Europeans and Africans (Fig. 2). The OCA2 protein is thought to be a mature melanosomal membrane protein [44], with a potential role in protein transportation into melanosomes [45]. The East Asian-specific variant of rs1800414 was first reported in an exome sequencing study aiming to figure out albinism-related variants [46]. The derived allele at rs1800414 was thought to contribute to the skin lightening in an association study of Han Chinese, which measured the skin color of individuals using the melanin index [47]. Another non-synonymous variant in OCA2, rs74653330, has also been confirmed to be pigmentation-related in an association study of Japanese [48]. Additional examples of East Asian-specific pigmentation-associated alleles include rs10809814 in TYRP1 and rs1407995 in DCT [40, 49], both of which show differentiation between Asians and non-Asians [47], and strong signals of positive selections in Asians [43, 49].

Despite distinct genes and variants under respective local adaptations in Europeans and East Asians, some genes have derived alleles reaching high frequencies in both continental groups. For instance, KITLG exhibits a selective sweep in non-Africans [50,51,52]. This gene is widely expressed in multiple tissues, including the skin, and functions in organ morphogenesis and cell proliferation. The Kit-ligand encoded by KITLG is known as the steel factor and plays a crucial role in the normal development and maintenance of the melanocyte lineage in adult skin [53]; this has been proved in human, fish, and mice [54,55,56]. The effects of this gene on pigmentation have also been confirmed in a series of association studies [57,58,59,60]. One of the key variants is rs642742, which is located at 326 kb upstream to the transcription start site of KITLG. At this variant, the ancestral allele frequency is over 90% in Africans, comparable to the derived allele frequency in Europeans and East Asians (Fig. 2). Similar patterns were observed in other genes, e.g., ASIP and BNC2 [39].

Two models of the evolutionary architecture of human pigmentation were proposed on the basis of the above results and other related studies (Fig. 2). One is a convergent evolution model [17, 40, 43, 49], suggesting that depigmentation has, to some degree, evolved independently in Europeans and East Asians, as different genes and variants have been suggested to explain the light skin and positive selection in these two continental groups. A recent study estimated the time of selective sweeps for the European-specific pigmentation variants to be around 11,000–19,000 years ago, after the divergence of Europeans and Asians [61]. An alternative model fits for the shared selective sweeps of Europeans and East Asians, which could possibly occur in proto-Eurasians. The onset of the sweep was estimated to be approximately 30,000 years ago, right after the “Out-of-Africa” migration, but earlier than the European-specific evolution on pigmentation [61]. The coexistence of these two models suggests a complex evolutionary history of skin color in modern humans.

Another clue of the complex genetic basis of skin color evolution is the allelic heterogeneity observed in a single gene, like OCA2 and MC1R. In each of these genes, some alleles are specific to Europeans, whereas others are specific to Asians, although they all have been proved to be depigmentation-related. In addition, OCA2 provides evidence of independent sweeps as well as convergent evolution in Europeans and Asians. Since results were obtained from studies using different samples, data, and methods, there could be some confounding factors leading to these different observations. However, more importantly, skin color is a complex trait that could not be simply explained by a single gene or variant; rather, it is likely to involve a huge network of genes and phenotypes. For instance, ASIP, an adaptive pigmentation gene in populations with European ancestry [62, 63], encodes the agouti signaling protein, which blocks MC1R in the eumelanin synthesis in response to the UV-induced DNA damage [40]. In the melanin production, TYR acts as the catalyzer of the key initial step, and its stability is maintained by TYRP1 and DCT.

In addition, scans for selection on skin pigmentation indicate two different selection behaviors acting on de novo mutations and standing variations, respectively. Some variants, represented by rs1805007 and rs1805008 in MC1R (in Europeans) and rs1800414 in OCA2 (in Asians), only show derived alleles in populations under positive selection at these loci, from which we could conjecture that they are new mutations that appeared after modern humans settled in Europe or Asia. In contrast, some variants, such as rs3212357 in MC1R (under positive selection in Europeans), present low frequencies in Africans. Regardless of possible mutation events and genetic drift in African populations, it is more likely that the derived allele at this locus has presented for some time before they became favored. Similar cases have been found in the high-altitude adaptation of Tibetans and the immunity adaptation in some modern human populations, and even in the evolution of pigmentation phenotypes in non-human species [56, 64].

Skin color adaptation in the admixed populations

Admixed populations, the hybrid offspring of two previously isolated populations, may provide important insights in understanding the genetics of geographical variation for two reasons. First, the loci underlying phenotypic differences in ancestral populations are also overlapping the highly informative markers of ancestry, which makes the admixed populations particularly useful for tracing population history. Second, the admixed populations usually have a wide range of variations regarding some specific phenotypes, which may increase the power of locating genes associated with complex traits/diseases after controlling potential population stratification.

Despite these advantages, admixed populations have rarely been considered in studies of human pigmentation variation. Current studies investigating pigmentation genes in admixed populations mainly involved those with African and European ancestry, such as African Americans, European Africans, and Latin Americans, since their ancestral populations are substantially differentiated in skin color. The ancestral genetic makeups differ among these three populations. African-Americans obtained the largest genetic contribution (~80%) from the African ancestry [65], Latin American mestizos have the least proportion of African ancestry (~10%) [66, 67], while in European Africans, the genetic components inherited from Europeans (~42%) and Africans (~58%) are comparable [68]. Uniquely in the Latin Americans, a considerable proportion of Native American ancestry (~45%) exists [66, 67]. Moreover, on the individual level, the proportion of each ancestry exhibits a large variance in each admixed population. For instance, the fraction of European ancestry varies from 2% to 98% among African American individuals [65]. The large variance of skin color in admixed individuals could result from their highly diverse genetic makeup, as a substantial correlation has been observed between ancestry proportion and skin color [68,69,70].

Multiple well-known candidate genes for pigmentation in Europeans have also been identified by admixture mapping (Fig. 3) or association studies in admixed populations. For instance, TYR, carrying a non-synonymous substitution rs1042602 (S192Y), was identified in African Americans [69] and European Africans from Cape Verde [68]. Variants in ASIP, such as rs6058017, which has been found to occur at different frequencies in global populations [63], were also reported to be associated with dark hair and brown eyes in European Americans [71], African Americans [62] and Brazilians [72]. Furthermore, KITLG showed strong signals of selective sweep in African Americans [51], with a significant preference to homozygotes of the African-specific allele (ancestral allele) at rs642742 in individuals with high melanin index (dark skin) [69]. Similar cases include rs1426654 in SLC24A5 in European Africans [68] and Latin Americans [72], and rs35395 in SLC45A2 in European Africans [68].

Fig. 3

A framework of admixture mapping to detect positive selection. The average faces of African, European, and African America were downloaded from

However, some studies reported discrepant results. The correlation between Native American ancestry and skin pigmentation reported in a Hispanic population [73] was not observed in a group of Puerto Rican women [70]. One of the key single nucleotide polymorphism loci (SNPs) in OCA2, rs1800404, showed a significant effect on skin pigmentation when analyzing African Americans and a combined population of African American and African-Caribbean, but was absent in an independent analysis of the African-Caribbean samples [69]. It is possible that different genetic mechanisms of skin color variation exist in various populations, but cautions should be taken regarding detailed information in the data, such as sample size and the ancestral populations selected for analyzing the admixed populations, which could lead to biased results [67, 69].

The identification of genetic determinants of natural variation of skin pigmentation was also conducted in other admixed populations. One successful example is a genome-wide association study of a population of South Asian descent [74], in which polymorphisms in SLC24A5, TYR and SLC45A2 showed significant associations with the melanin content in skin. The light skin alleles in South Asian could possibly be inherited from their European ancestors [75], who initially arrived at this region around 3500–4000 years ago along with Indo-European language expansion [76], followed by recent colonization in the last few centuries. In addition, Central Asia and Southeast Asia are home to various admixed populations, which are likewise of great potential in the study of skin color adaptation. Admixed population analyses may greatly enrich our understanding of skin color variation in modern human populations.

Skin color adaptation in the aboriginal populations

The aboriginal populations in different areas around the world have many implications for human evolutionary history. They have been regarded as the early settlers in respective areas. Despite having been assimilated by their surrounding agriculturalists to some extent, some aboriginal people have preserved their traditional livelihoods as hunter-gatherers, as well as their original physical traits – dark skin, short stature, and curly hair.

The hunter-gatherer populations with dark skin, short stature and curly hair have attracted much attention (Fig. 4a). The genetic mechanism underlying the shared phenotypes among these geographically distant populations (collectively called Negritos or Pygmies), from Central Africa, the Andaman Islands, Southeast Asia and Oceania, are still controversial; for example, whether they were the common descent from a pre-Neolithic substrate of humanity or a consequence of convergent evolution [77, 78]. To date, most genetic studies on this issue have focused on height [78,79,80,81]. One study provided clues for convergent evolution from the view of skin pigmentation adaptation by analyzing MC1R diversity in the Melanesians [82]. This study showed that the ancestral haplotypes of MC1R are not highly conserved between Northern Island Melanesians and Africans, although both populations live in the high UV region, which is in contrast to previous findings based on very limited samples [30, 83]. Besides, a non-synonymous polymorphism, rs2228479, shows enriched derived alleles specifically in East Asians, but is not significantly associated with skin or hair pigmentation in Melanesians. Actually, the Melanesian population exhibits striking skin pigmentation variation [84], and consistently, some variants have been identified to be region-specific, which could partly explain this phenotypic variation. A notable example is a non-synonymous variant, rs387907171, in TYRP1 [85]. It is restricted to the Solomons and parts of the Bismarck Archipelago, and might contribute to the ‘blond hair’ in this region [85, 86]. These results emphasize the complex genetic architecture of pigmentation phenotypes, and also highlight the role that population history (e.g., the complex population history of the Southwest Pacific [87,88,89]) can play a role in influencing phenotypic diversity. Skin pigmentation studies on other modern aboriginal populations (besides Melanesians) are scarce, except for one investigating the Senoi population (an indigenous population) from the Malay Peninsula, which is an admixture of the Negrito (dark-skinned) and the southern Mongoloid from Indo-China (yellow-brown-skinned), and has a wide skin color spectrum [90]. The authors of this study found that despite the low derived allele frequency, the A111T mutation (rs1426654) in SLC24A5 is significantly associated with the light skin in Senoi, which was suspected to result from the admixture of the Mongoloid and South Asians.

Fig. 4

Skin color of aboriginal people in the Equatorial zone and the Arctic. (a) Skin color comparison between Bateq (a subgroup of Negrito) and Malay from Peninsular Malaysia. (b) Skin color comparison between Inuit and Swedish from similar latitudes. Portraits of Malay and Swedish individuals are provided by the Joshua Project (, the Bateq portrait is from, and the Inuit portrait is from

Another interesting issue concerning human skin color adaptation comes from the arctic people. The Inuit people, in far North Eastern Asia and the American Subarctic, have yellowish-brown skin despite the far northern latitude at which they live, unlike other populations living at the same latitude, such as the Swedes and Finnish (Fig. 4b). This makes the Inuit population an exception of the latitude-correlated distribution of skin color. One possible reason is that the dark skin could protect the Inuits from the severe UV exposure because of the long daylight hours in winter and high levels of UV reflection from the snow. While the dark skin is a disadvantage for vitamin D production, plenty of vitamins including vitamin D could be compensated from their diets [91, 92]. Another cause could be the founder effect of the ancient East Asian ancestry of the Inuits, who have inhabited the arctic region since nearly 5000 years ago, and had higher melanin production than the European ancestry. However, very few genetic studies have been conducted to determine the genetic basis of dark skin in arctic populations.

Skin color adaptation in the ancient hominins

The dark skin in modern humans was established around 1.2 million years ago, driven by the loss of body hair after divergence from apes, presumably to protect against UV-induced damages [13, 93,94,95,96]. Then, when did modern Eurasians start to depigment? The studies on skin color adaptation summarized above are based on modern population genetic data, which may suffer from limited temporal resolution caused by the population demographic history, and insensitivity to selection acting on standing variations [97]. The advent of ancient DNA analyses makes it possible to directly observe the evolution processes, and thus would facilitate our understanding of this key question.

A study on the genomes of Anatolian Neolithic farmers in West Eurasia (6500–300 BC), who are probably the source population of the first European farmers, suggests that the light skin color has been evolved since at least 6500–4000 years ago [98]. Several popular genes identified in modern Eurasians, e.g., SLC45A2, GRM5 and HERC2/OCA2 showed strong signal of selection in these ancient samples. This conclusion is supported by another study based on the Eneolithic (6500–5000 BP) and Bronze Age (5000–4000 BP) samples, representing the early European farmers or late hunter-gatherers in central Europe [99]. One possible motivation of the skin depigmentation in prehistoric Eurasia is agriculturalization, which led to a switch from vitamin D-rich hunter-gatherer diet to a vitamin D-poor agriculturalist diet, together with the increased danger of folic acid deficiency at higher latitudes [14, 100]. Moreover, the selective pressures have kept operating for a long time after they initiated the adaptation of skin color, as some ancestral pigmentations alleles were identified in a Mesolithic European (7000 BP), and some adaptive alleles under selection in the ancient Eurasians are still evolving in modern humans [98, 99, 101].

Recent studies on archaic hominins (e.g., Neanderthals, an extinct hominid group living in Eurasia ~400,000–28,000 years ago [102]) further improved our understanding of skin color evolution in modern humans. Neanderthals met modern humans in the Middle East ~60,000–50,000 years ago, and contributed to about 1–4% of modern human genomes [103,104,105]. Some pigmentation-associated genes are identified in the introgressed haplotypes from Neanderthals in modern Eurasians, such as POU2F3, BNC2 and MC1R [106, 107]. Specifically, the introgressive alleles were reported to result in light skin color, suggesting an ‘adaptive introgression’ strategy of human skin color adaptation. Other introgressive genes related to skin phenotypes include HYAL genes, which are associated with cellular responses to UV and are under strong positive selection in East Asians [108], and those involved in keratin filaments formation [109]. Although these genes are not direct determinants of skin pigmentation, they, like those pigmentation-related genes, possibly helped modern humans adapt to non-African environments.

When drawing conclusions of adaptive introgression, we are actually claiming that Neanderthals could be light-complexioned. This inference is just based on some pigmentation-associated genes or alleles identified in existing modern human populations, since visible phenotypes of Neanderthals and other extinct species are not available. However, when using some other priory genes as potential clues, different results can be obtained. For instance, the derived state of MC1R, which is responsible for pale skin, presents in Neanderthal individuals from Italy and Spain but is missing in Croatian Neanderthals and Denisova [110], suggesting skin color variation in the archaic hominins. In addition, the light skin in Neanderthals and modern Eurasians could also result from convergent evolution, rather than adaptive introgression [111].

The hypothesis of adaptive introgression seems to predate when modern human became pale – long before the late Mesolithic age, as Neanderthals went extinct around 28,000 years ago. However, we should reconsider whether the genes affecting skin color in archaic hominins indeed determined skin color in modern humans. Even if this is the case, it is also possible that modern human retained these introgressive variants until they showed some phenotypic effects under some specific strong selective pressures. Thus, more data resources and analyses are necessary to address this issue in the future.

Selection coefficient and effect size

As one of the most obvious changes in the environment after modern human migrated out of Africa to higher latitudes, UV has exerted considerable selective pressures on human skin pigmentation, which can be reflected by selection coefficients of the pigmentation-related genes. The estimation of selection coefficients largely depends on the genes considered and the methodologies. Beleza et al. estimated the coefficient of selection at several loci representing SLC24A5, SLC45A2, TYRP1, and KITLG [61]. For example, the estimates are 0.05/0.04 for SLC45A2 and 0.16/0.08 for SLC24A5 under a dominant/an additive model of inheritance in Europeans. Meanwhile, López et al. reported the selection coefficient of a variant in SLC45A2 to be 0.01–0.02 in a South European populations [112]. These estimations are comparable to the selection coefficients inferred directly from serially sampled data at HERC2, SLC45A2, and TYR, ranging from 0.02–0.1 [99]. The selection coefficients estimated for pigmentation genes are best understood in the context of estimates for other recently selected loci. The selection advantages are inferred to be 0.01–0.08 for LCT, a gene strongly associated with lactase persistence in populations with European ancestry [113, 114], 0.019–0.048 for G6PD, a gene conferring malaria resistance in African populations [115], 0.03–0.19 for EDAR associated with the increased scalp hair thickness and changed tooth morphology in the Han Chinese [116], and 0.0004–0.0023 for EGLN1 and EPAS1 gene regions contributing to the high-altitude adaptation in Tibetans [117]. The selection coefficients for pigmentation genes are among the most strongly selected genes in the human genome, indicating a severe selective pressure caused by UV or some other environmental changes in non-African regions.

Although a large number of genes have been identified to contribute to skin color variation, how much could they explain the skin color variation in modern humans? Is there a gene or variant that has a dominant effect on the skin color? Some genes could possibly play a major role in determining skin color in specific populations. For instance, the light skin variant at rs1426654 in SLC24A5 could explain 22–32% of the variance of the melanin index in South Asian [75] and 25–38% in African-American and African-Caribbean populations [118]. Additionally, the derived allele at rs642742 in KITLG may account for lightening of a person’s skin by 6 to 7 melanin units, nearly 1/5 of the overall skin reflectance difference between West Africans and Europeans (30 melanin units) [56]. However, there are relatively more genes and variants with smaller effects. One of the key variants in OCA2, rs1800414, could explain around 4% of the pigmentation variation in East Asian populations [47]. In South Asians, rs16891982 in SLC45A2 and rs1042602 in TYR account for 3.6% and 2.5% skin color variation, respectively, much less than the effect size of rs1426654 in SLC24A5 [74]. The inheritance mode of skin pigmentation follows an additive model, or at least an incomplete additive model [16, 17, 47, 56, 75].


Overall, human skin color is a highly variable and complex trait as a consequence of strong selection pressure and is controlled by multiple genetic loci (summarized in Table 1). Skin color adaptation is a complex process because different populations have shared and independent genetic mechanisms involving a large number of genes with different effect advantages on the phenotype. Skin color adaptation is also a long evolutionary process influenced by various historical, even pre-historical, population genetic events. Current studies provide comprehensive insights into the natural selection process and mechanisms of human skin color variation. A richer resource of high-coverage whole-genome sequences and phenotype data may provide opportunities to further speculate an accurate model of genetic architecture and gene-environment effects, and advance our understanding of skin pigmentation in certain minor ethnic groups, such as hunter-gatherers and highlanders. We believe that these studies may greatly enrich our knowledge of human evolution history and elucidate the genetic basis of complex traits in humans.

Table 1 A summary of candidate genes of human adaptation on pigmentation


  1. 1.

    Ito S, Wakamatsu K. Quantitative analysis of eumelanin and pheomelanin in humans, mice, and other animals: a comparative review. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:523–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hennessy A, Oh C, Diffey B, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Rees J. Eumelanin and pheomelanin concentrations in human epidermis before and after UVB irradiation. Pigment Cell Res. 2005;18:220–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thody AJ, Higgins EM, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Burchill SA, Marks JM. Pheomelanin as well as eumelanin is present in human epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1991;97:340–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Riley PA. Melanin. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29:1235–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Barsh GS. What controls variation in human skin color? PLoS Biol. 2003;1:e27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tennessen JA, Akey JM. Parallel adaptive divergence among geographically diverse human populations. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002127.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gautam P, Chaurasia A, Bhattacharya A, Grover R. Indian genome variation consortium, Mukerji M, et al. population diversity and adaptive evolution in keratinization genes: impact of environment in shaping skin phenotypes. Mol. Biol. Evolution. 2015;32:555–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    He YY, Wang XC, Jin PK, Zhao B, Fan X. Complexation of anthracene with folic acid studied by FTIR and UV spectroscopies. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2009;72:876–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Juzeniene A, Stokke KT, Thune P, Moan J. Pilot study of folate status in healthy volunteers and in patients with psoriasis before and after UV exposure. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2010;101:111–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2001;63:8–18.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    De Gruijl FR, Van Kranen HJ, Mullenders LHF. UV-induced DNA damage, repair, mutations and oncogenic pathways in skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2001;63:19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brenner M, Hearing VJ. The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin. Photochem Photobiol. 2008;84:539–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Greaves M. Was skin cancer a selective force for black pigmentation in early hominin evolution? Proc R Soc B. 2014;281:20132955.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. Human skin pigmentation as an adaptation to UV radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(Suppl 2):8962–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hart PH, Gorman S, Finlay-Jones JJ. Modulation of the immune system by UV radiation: more than just the effects of vitamin D? Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:584–896.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lamason RL, Mohideen MA, Mest JR, Wong AC, Norton HL, Aros MC, et al. SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science. 2005;310:1782–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Norton HL, Kittles RA, Parra E, McKeigue P, Mao X, Cheng K, et al. Genetic evidence for the convergent evolution of light skin in Europeans and East Asians. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:710–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Soejima M, Tachida H, Ishida T, Sano A, Koda Y. Evidence for recent positive selection at the human AIM1 locus in a European population. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:179–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ginger RS, Askew SE, Ogborne RM, Wilson S, Ferdinando D, Dadd T, et al. SLC24A5 encodes a trans-Golgi network protein with potassium-dependent sodium-calcium exchange activity that regulates human epidermal melanogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:5486–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Vogel P, Read RW, Vance RB, Platt KA, Troughton K, Rice DS. Ocular albinism and hypopigmentation defects in Slc24a5−/− mice. Vet Pathol. 2008;45:264–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Soejima M, Koda Y. Population differences of two coding SNPs in pigmentation-related genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. Int J Legal Med. 2007;121:36–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Canfield VA, Berg A, Peckins S, Wentzel SM, Ang KC, Oppenheimer S, et al. Molecular phylogeography of a human autosomal skin color locus under natural selection. G3. 2013;3:2059–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cook AL, Chen W, Thurber AE, Smit DJ, Smith AG, Bladen TG, et al. Analysis of cultured human melanocytes based on polymorphisms within the SLC45A2/MATP, SLC24A5/NCKX5, and OCA2/P loci. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:392–405.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Fukamachi S, Shimada A, Shima A. Mutations in the gene encoding B, a novel transporter protein, reduce melanin content in medaka. Nat Genet. 2001;28:381–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mariat D, Taourit S, Guérin G. A mutation in the MATP gene causes the cream coat colour in the horse. Genet Sel Evol. 2003;35:119–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gunnarsson U, Hellström AR, Tixier-Boichard M, Minvielle F, Bed’hom B, Ito S, et al. Mutations in SLC45A2 cause plumage color variation in chicken and Japanese quail. Genetics. 2007;175:867–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nakayama K, Fukamachi S, Kimura H, Koda Y, Soemantri A, Ishida T. Distinctive distribution of AIM1 polymorphism among major human populations with different skin color. J Hum Genet. 2002;47:92–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Valenzuela RK, Ito S, Wakamatsu K, Brilliant MH. Prediction model validation: normal human pigmentation variation. J Forensic Res. 2011;2:1000139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Martínez-Cadenas C, López S, Ribas G, Flores C, García O, Sevilla A, et al. Simultaneous purifying selection on the ancestral MC1R allele and positive selection on the melanoma-risk allele V60L in south Europeans. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2654–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Harding RM, Healy E, Ray AJ, Ellis NS, Flanagan N, Todd C, et al. Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1351–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rees JL, Flanagan N. Pigmentation, melanocortins and red hair. Q J Med. 1999;92:125–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Klungland H, Vâge DI, Gomez-Raya L, Adalsteinsson S, Lien S. The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination. Mamm Genome. 1995;6:636–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Marklund L, Moller MJ, Sandberg K, Andersson L. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses. Mamm Genome. 1996;7:895–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Takeuchi S, Suzuki H, Yabuuchi M, Takahashi S. Possible involvement of melanocortin 1-receptor in regulating feather color pigmentation in the chicken. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1308:164–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sturm RA. GSTP1 and MC1R in melanoma susceptibility. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166:1155–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tiosano D, Audi L, Climer S, Zhang W, Templeton AR, Fernández-Cancio M, et al. Latitudinal clines of the human vitamin D receptor and skin color genes. G3. 2016;6:1251–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Nan H, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Han J. Genetic variants in pigmentation genes, pigmentary phenotypes, and risk of skin cancer in Caucasians. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:909–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Myles S, Somel M, Tang K, Kelso J, Stoneking M. Identifying genes underlying skin pigmentation differences among human populations. Hum Genet. 2007;120:613–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    McEvoy B, Beleza S, Shriver MD. The genetic architecture of normal variation in human pigmentation: an evolutionary perspective and model. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:176–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sturm RA, Duffy DL. Human pigmentation genes under environmental selection. Genome Biol. 2012;13:248.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Donnelly MP, Paschou P, Grigorenko E, Gurwitz D, Barta C, Lu RB, et al. A global view of the OCA2-HERC2 region and pigmentation. Hum Genet. 2012;131:683–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Yuasa I, Umetsu K, Harihara S, Kido A, Miyoshi A, Saitou N, et al. Distribution of two Asian-related coding SNPs in the MC1R and OCA2 genes. Biochem Genet. 2007;45:535–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hider JL, Gittelman RM, Shah T, Edwards M, Rosenbloom A, Akey JMJ, et al. Exploring signatures of positive selection in pigmentation candidate genes in populations of East Asian ancestry. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:150.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sitaram A, Piccirillo R, Palmisano I, Harper DC, Dell’Angelica EC, Schiaffino MV, et al. Localization to mature melanosomes by virtue of cytoplasmic dileucine motifs is required for human OCA2 function. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:1464–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hoyle DJ, Rodriguez-Fernandez IA, Dell'Angelica EC. Functional interactions between OCA2 and the protein complexes BLOC-1, BLOC-2 and AP-3 inferred from epistatic analysies of mouse coat pigmentation. Pigment Cell Res. 2011;24:275–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lee ST, Nicholls RD, Jong MTC, Fukai K, Spritz RA. Organization and sequence of the human P gene and identification of a new family of transport proteins. Genomics. 1995;26:354–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Edwards M, Bigham A, Tan J, Li S, Gozdzik A, Ross K, et al. Association of the OCA2 polymorphism His615Arg with melanin content in East Asian populations: further evidence of convergent evolution of skin pigmentation. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1000867.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Abe Y, Tamiya G, Nakamura T, Hozumi Y, Suzuki T. Association of melanogenesis genes with skin color variation among Japanese females. J Dermatol Sci. 2013;69:167–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Alonso S, Izagirre N, Smith-Zubiaga I, Gardeazabal J, Díaz-Ramón JL, Díaz-Pérez JL, et al. Complex signatures of selection for the melanogenic loci TYR, TYRP1 and DCT in humans. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lao O, De Gruijter JM, Van Duijn K, Navarro A, Kayser M. Signatures of positive selection in genes associated with human skin pigmentation as revealed from analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Ann Hum Genet. 2007;71:354–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Williamson SH, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG, Payseur BA, Bustamante CD, Nielsen R. Localizing recent adaptive evolution in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Pickrell JK, Coop G, Novembre J. Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. Genome Res. 2009;19:826–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Wehrle-Haller B. The role of kit-ligand in melanocyte development and epidermal homeostasis. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:287–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Imokawa G. Autocrine and paracrine regulation of melanocytes in human skin and in pigmentary disorders. Pigment Cell Res. 2004;17:96–110.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bennett DC, Lamoreux ML. The color loci of mice--a genetic century. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:333–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Miller CT, Beleza S, Pollen AA, Schluter D, Kittles RA, Shriver MD, et al. Cis-regulatory changes in kit ligand expression and parallel evolution of pigmentation in sticklebacks and humans. Cell. 2007;131:1179–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sulem P, Gudbjartsson DF, Stacey SN, Helgason A, Rafnar T, Magnusson KP, et al. Genetic determinants of hair, eye and skin pigmentation in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2007;39:1443–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhang M, Song F, Liang L, Nan H, Zhang J, Liu H, et al. Genome-wide association studies identify several new loci associated with pigmentation traits and skin cancer risk in European Americans. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:2948–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Van Der Harst P, Zhang W, Leach IM, Rendon A, Verweij N, Sehmi J, et al. Seventy-five genetic loci influencing the human red blood cell. Nature. 2012;492:369–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lin BD, Mbarek H, Willemsen G, Dolan CV, Fedko IO, Abdellaoui A, et al. Heritability and genome-wide association studies for hair color in a Dutch twin family based sample. Genes. 2015;6:559–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Santos M, Mcevoy B, Alves I, Cameron E, Shriver MD, Parra EJ, et al. The timing of pigmentation lightening in Europeans. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:24–35.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bonilla C, Boxill L-A, McDonald SA, Williams T, Sylvester N, Parra EJ, et al. The 8818G allele of the agouti signaling protein (ASIP) gene is ancestral and is associated with darker skin color in African Americans. Hum Genet. 2005;116:402–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zeigler-johnson C, Panossian S, Gueye SM, Jalloh M, Ofori-Adjei D, Kanetsky PA. Population differences in the frequency of the agouti signaling protein g.8818A>G polymorphism. Pigment Cell Res. 2004;17:185–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lu D, Lou H, Yuan K, Wang X, Wang Y, Zhang C, et al. Ancestral origins and genetic history of Tibetan highlanders. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:580–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Jin W. Admixture dynamics, natural selection and diseases in admixed populations. Netherlands: Springer; 2015.

  66. 66.

    Wang S, Ray N, Rojas W, Parra MV, Bedoya G, Gallo C, et al. Geographic patterns of genome admixture in Latin American mestizos. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000037.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Deng L, Ruiz-Linares A, Xu S, Wang S. Ancestry variation and footprints of natural selection along the genome in Latin American populations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21766.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Beleza S, Johnson NA, Candille SI, Absher DM, Coram MA, Anderson TM, et al. Genetic architecture of skin and eye color in an African-European admixed population. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003372.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Shriver MD, Parra EJ, Dios S, Bonilla C, Norton H, Jovel C, et al. Skin pigmentation, biogeographical ancestry and admixture mapping. Hum Genet. 2003;112:387–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bonilla C, Shriver MD, Parra EJ, Jones A, Fernández JR. Ancestral proportions and their association with skin pigmentation and bone mineral density in Puerto Rican women from New York city. Hum Genet. 2004;115:57–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Kanetsky PA, Swoyer J, Panossian S, Holmes R, Guerry D, Rebbeck TR. A polymorphism in the agouti signaling protein gene is associated with human pigmentation. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;70:770–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    de Araújo LF, de Toledo GF, Fridman C. SLC24A5 and ASIP as phenotypic predictors in Brazilian population for forensic purposes. Legal Med. 2015;17:261–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Bonilla C, Parra EJ, Pfaff CL, Dios S, Marshall JA, Hamman RF, et al. Admixture in the Hispanics of the San Luis Valley, Colorado, and its implications for complex trait gene mapping. Ann Hum Genet. 2004;68:139–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Stokowski RP, Krishna Pant VK, Dadd T, Fereday A, Hinds DA, Jarman C, et al. A genomewide association study of skin pigmentation in a south Asian population. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1119–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Basu Mallick C, Iliescu FM, Möls M, Hill S, Tamang R, Chaubey G, et al. The light skin allele of SLC24A5 in south Asians and Europeans shares identity by descent. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003912.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Cavalli-Sforza LL, Menozzi P PA. The history and geography of human genes. Princeton, NJ Princet. Univ. Press. 1994.

  77. 77.

    Endicott P. Introduction: revisiting the “negrito” hypothesis: a transdisciplinary approach to human prehistory in Southeast Asia. Hum Biol. 2013;85:7–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Manni F, Toupance B, Migliano AB, Romero IG, Metspalu M, Leavesley M, et al. Evolution of the pygmy phenotype: evidence of positive selection from genome-wide scans in African, Asian, and Melanesian pygmies. Hum Biol. 2013;85:251–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Clavano-Harding AB, Ambler GR, Cowell CT, Garnett SP, Al-Toumah B, Coakley JC, et al. Initial characterization of the GH-IGF axis and nutritional status of the Ati Negritos of the Philippines. Clin Endocrinol. 1999;51:741–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Dávila N, Shea BT, Omoto K, Mercado M, Misawa S, Baumann G. Growth hormone binding protein, insulin-like growth factor-I and short stature in two pygmy populations from the Philippines. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2002;15:269–76.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Mendizabal I, Marigorta UM, Lao O, Comas D. Adaptive evolution of loci covarying with the human African pygmy phenotype. Hum Genet. 2012;131:1305–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Norton HL, Werren E, Friedlaender J. MC1R diversity in Northern Island Melanesia has not been constrained by strong purifying selection and cannot explain pigmentation phenotype variation in the region. BMC Genet. 2015;16:122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Rana BK, Hewett-Emmett D, Jin L, Chang BHJ, Sambuughin N, Lin M, et al. High polymorphism at the human melanocortin 1 receptor locus. Genetics. 1999;151:1547–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Norton HL, Friedlaender JS, Merriwether DA, Koki G, Mgone CS, Shriver MD. Skin and hair pigmentation variation in island Melanesia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;130:254–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Kenny EE, Timpson NJ, Sikora M, Yee MC, Moreno-Estrada A, Eng C, et al. Melanesian blond hair is caused by an amino acid change in TYRP1. Science 2012;336:554–554.

  86. 86.

    Norton HL, Correa EA, Koki G, Friedlaender JS. Distribution of an allele associated with blond hair color across northern island melanesia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2014;153:653–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Skoglund P, Posth C, Sirak K, Spriggs M, Valentin F, Bedford S, et al. Genomic insights into the peopling of the Southwest Pacific. Nature. 2016;538:510–3.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Delfin F, Myles S, Choi Y, Hughes D, Illek R, van Oven M, et al. Bridging near and remote Oceania: mtDNA and NRY variation in the Solomon Islands. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29:545–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Friedlaender JS, Friedlaender FR, Reed FA, Kidd KK, Kidd JR, Chambers GK, et al. The genetic structure of Pacific islanders. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e19.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Ang KC, Ngu MS, Reid KP, Teh MS, Aida ZS, Koh DX, et al. Skin color variation in Orang Asli tribes of peninsular Malaysia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e42752.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Schaebel LK, Bonefeld-Jørgensen EC, Laurberg P, Vestergaard H, Andersen S. Vitamin D-rich marine Inuit diet and markers of inflammation–a population-based survey in Greenland. J Nutr Sci. 2015;4:e40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Kolahdooz F, Barr A, Roache C, Sheehy T, Corriveau A, Sharma S. Dietary adequacy of vitamin D and calcium among inuit and inuvialuit women of child-bearing age in Arctic Canada: a growing concern. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78987.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Jablonski NG, Chaplin G. The evolution of human skin coloration. J Hum Evol. 2000;39:57–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Rogers AR, Iltis D, Wooding S. Genetic variation at the MC1R locus and the time since loss of human body hair. Curr Anthropol. 2003:105–8.

  95. 95.

    Branda RF, Eaton JW. Skin color and nutrient photolysis: an evolutionary hypothesis. Science. 1978;201:625–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Robins AH. Biological Perspectives on Human Pigmentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press; 1991.

  97. 97.

    Peter BM, Huerta-Sanchez E, Nielsen R. Distinguishing between selective sweeps from standing variation and from a de novo mutation. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003011.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Mathieson I, Lazaridis I, Rohland N, Mallick S, Patterson N, Roodenberg SA, et al. Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians. Nature. 2015;528:499–503.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Wilde S, Timpson A, Kirsanow K, Kaiser E, Kayser M, Unterländer M, et al. Direct evidence for positive selection of skin, hair, and eye pigmentation in Europeans during the last 5,000 y. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:4832–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Richards MP, Schulting RJ, Hedges RE. Archaeology: sharp shift in diet at onset of Neolithic. Nature. 2003;425:366.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Olalde I, Allentoft ME, Sánchez-Quinto F, Santpere G, Chiang CWK, DeGiorgio M, et al. Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old Mesolithic European. Nature. 2014;507:225–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Finlayson C, Pacheco FG, Rodríguez-Vidal J, Fa DA, Gutierrez López JM, Santiago Pérez A, et al. Late survival of Neanderthals at the southernmost extreme of Europe. Nature. 2006;443:850–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Durand EY, Patterson N, Reich D, Slatkin M. Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2239–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Fu Q, Hajdinjak M, Moldovan OT, Constantin S, Mallick S, Skoglund P, et al. An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor. Nature. 2015;524:216–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Fu Q, Li H, Moorjani P, Jay F, Slepchenko SM, Bondarev AA, et al. Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from western Siberia. Nature. 2014;514:445–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Vernot B, Akey JM. Resurrecting surviving Neandeltal linages from modern human genomes. Science. 2014;343:1017–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Ding Q, Hu Y, Xu S, Wang C, Li H, Zhang R, et al. Neanderthal origin of the haplotypes carrying the functional variant Val92Met in the MC1R in modern humans. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:1994–2003.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Ding Q, Hu Y, Xu S, Wang J, Jin L. Neanderthal introgression at chromosome 3p21.31 was under positive natural selection in East Asians. Mol. Biol. Evolution. 2013;31:683–95.

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Sankararaman S, Mallick S, Dannemann M, Prüfer K, Kelso J, Pääbo S, et al. The landscape of Neandertal ancestry in present-day humans. Nature. 2014;507:354–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Cerqueira CCS, Paixão-Côrtes VR, Zambra FMB, Salzano FM, Hünemeier T, Bortolini MC. Predicting homo pigmentation phenotype through genomic data: from neanderthal to James Watson. Am J Hum Biol. 2012;24:705–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Lalueza-Fox C, Römpler H, Caramelli D, Stäubert C, Catalano G, Hughes D, et al. A melanocortin 1 receptor allele suggests varying pigmentation among Neanderthals. Science. 2007;318:1453–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    López S, García Ó, Yurrebaso I, Flores C, Acosta-Herrera M, Chen H, et al. The interplay between natural selection and susceptibility to melanoma on allele 374F of SLC45A2 gene in a south European population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e104367.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Itan Y, Powell A, Beaumont MA, Burger J, Thomas MG. The origins of lactase persistence in Europe. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000491.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Gerbault P, Moret C, Currat M, Sanchez-Mazas A. Impact of selection and demography on the diffusion of lactase persistence. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6369.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Tishkoff SA, Varkonyi R, Cahinhinan N, Abbes S, Argyropoulos G, Destro-Bisol G, et al. Haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium at human G6PD: recent origin of alleles that confer malarial resistance. Science. 2001;293:455–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Kamberov YG, Wang S, Tan J, Gerbault P, Wark A, Tan L, et al. Modeling recent human evolution in mice by expression of a selected EDAR variant. Cell. 2013;152:691–702.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Jeong C, Alkorta-Aranburu G, Basnyat B, Neupane M, Witonsky DB, Pritchard JK, et al. Admixture facilitates genetic adaptations to high altitude in Tibet. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3281.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Sturm RA. Molecular genetics of human pigmentation diversity. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:9–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Coop G, Pickrell JK, Novembre J, Kudaravalli S, Li J, Absher D, et al. The role of geography in human adaptation. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Flanagan N, Healy E, Ray A, Philips S, Todd C, Jackson IJ, et al. Pleiotropic effects of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene on human pigmentation. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9:2531–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Córdoba-Lanús E, Hernández-Jiménez JG, Medina-Coello C, Espinoza-Jiménez A, González A, Rodríguez-Pérez MDC, et al. MC1R gene variants and sporadic malignant melanoma susceptibility in the Canary Islands population. Arch Dermatol Res. 2014;306:51–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Yang Z, Zhong H, Chen J, Zhang X, Zhang H, Luo X, et al. A genetic mechanism for convergent skin lightening during recent human evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1177–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank LetPub ( for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.


S.X. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) grant (91331204 and 31711530221), the Strategic Priority Research Program (XDB13040100) and Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-SYS009) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (31525014), and the Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (16XD1404700); S.X. is Max-Planck Independent Research Group Leader and member of CAS Youth Innovation Promotion Association. S.X. also gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Program for Top-notch Young Innovative Talents of The “Wanren Jihua” Project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

SX and LD drafted the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhua Xu.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, L., Xu, S. Adaptation of human skin color in various populations. Hereditas 155, 1 (2018).

Download citation


  • Skin color
  • Natural selection
  • Genetic adaptation
  • Modern humans
  • Archaic hominin