Skip to main content
Download PDF

SMPD1 expression profile and mutation landscape help decipher genotype–phenotype association and precision diagnosis for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency

Hereditas volume 160, Article number: 11 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) disorder, also known as Niemann–Pick disease (NPD) is a rare genetic disease caused by mutations in SMPD1 gene, which encodes sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase (ASM). Except for liver and spleen enlargement and lung disease, two subtypes (Type A and B) of NDP have different onset times, survival times, ASM activities, and neurological abnormalities. To comprehensively explore NPD’s genotype-phenotype association and pathophysiological characteristics, we collected 144 NPD cases with strict quality control through literature mining.

Results

The difference in ASM activity can differentiate NPD type A from other subtypes, with the ratio of ASM activity to the reference values being lower in type A (threshold 0.045 (4.45%)). Severe variations, such as deletion and insertion, can cause complete loss of ASM function, leading to type A, whereas relatively mild missense mutations generally result in type B. Among reported mutations, the p.Arg3AlafsX76 mutation is highly prevalent in the Chinese population, and the p.R608del mutation is common in Mediterranean countries. The expression profiles of SMPD1 from GTEx and single-cell RNA sequencing data of multiple fetal tissues showed that high expressions of SMPD1 can be observed in the liver, spleen, and brain tissues of adults and hepatoblasts, hematopoietic stem cells, STC2_TLX1-positive cells, mesothelial cells of the spleen, vascular endothelial cells of the cerebellum and the cerebrum of fetuses, indicating that SMPD1 dysfunction is highly likely to have a significant effect on the function of those cell types during development and the clinicians need pay attention to these organs or tissues as well during diagnosis. In addition, we also predicted 21 new pathogenic mutations in the SMPD1 gene that potentially cause the NPD, signifying that more rare cases will be detected with those mutations in SMPD1. Finally, we also analysed the function of the NPD type A cells following the extracellular milieu.

Conclusions

Our study is the first to elucidate the effects of SMPD1 mutation on cell types and at the tissue level, which provides new insights into the genotype-phenotype association and can help in the precise diagnosis of NPD.

Background

Lysosome storage disease (LSD) is a collection of inherited metabolic illnesses. There are about 50 classified LSDs [1, 2]. LSD occurs when lysosomes are unable to degrade macromolecules, such as fats and sugars, and the then deposition of macromolecules to toxic levels in organelles forms cell inclusions, which causes various signs and symptoms. Gaucher’s disease (GD), Krabbe disease (KD), Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (ML) and Niemann-Pick disease (NPD) are all inherited rare autosomal recessive LSDs resulting from impaired degradation of sphingolipids with different deficiency of the upstream enzymes [2]. GD results from the deficiency of the enzyme β-glucosidase [3,4,5,6]. Genetic mutations in GALC result in a deficiency of galactosylceramidase, leading to KD [1] which was first described one [7]. Abnormal functions of arylsulfatase resulting from the mutations in the ARSA and PSAP genes (more rarely) [8] lead to ML. NPD types A and B are due to a deficiency of the enzyme sphingomyelinase [3, 9].

Recognising it as a spectrum of disorders, the nomenclature NPD is no longer used in some specific areas; instead, the disorder is called acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD). However, recent studies still use Niemann-Pick disease for clarity. In patients with hepatosplenomegaly, lipid-filled foam-like cells can be seen in the bone marrow, brain, and organs often called Niemann–Pick cells. The cause for NPD type A (NPA, MIM257200) and NPD type B (NPB, MIM607616) have been clarified with the mutations in the SMPD1 gene encoding sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase-1 [10] after ASMD was reconginzed as the factor for type A NPD [11] . Thus, patients with NPA and NPB can be diagnosed with the measurement of acid sphingomyelinase (ASM). NPD type C (NPD-C1, MIM257220; or NPD-C2, MIM601015) results from a defect in the transport of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in cells [12, 13]. Type D is also known as Nova Scotia NPD; some cases are an allelic variant of NPD-C1 [14, 15]. However, type D NPD is no longer used [10].

The SMPD1 gene comprises six exons and spans 5 kb on chromosome 11p15.4-p15.1 [16]. It encodes the human ASM protein (UniProt ID P17405) with 631-amino acids composed of a saposin domain, a proline-rich linker, a metallophosphatase catalytic domain, and a C-terminal domain. Six potential N-linked glycosylation sites, eight disulfides, and two zinc ions in ASM play critical roles in protein folding and stability [17, 18]. By maintaining proper sphingolipid homeostasis and participating in membrane turnover, ASM interacts with other lipid hydrolases within lysosomes [10]. During stress, ASM translocates rapidly from lysosomes to the plasma membrane and hydrolyses sphingomyelin into ceramide [19, 20]. As a result, membrane lipid microdomains, or “rafts,” are reorganised, stimulating downstream signalling [10].

Symptoms of NPA include central nervous system (CNS) deterioration, cherry-red macula, and massive hepatosplenomegaly, leading to death at an early age, whereas patients with NPB have a better prognosis [21], which symptoms are non-neuropathic. Patients with NPA often die before diagnosis (early onset) [22]. Most NPB patients could survive into adulthood and even until the 70s. Currently, NPA and NPB have no efficient treatment. Bone marrow transplantation [23] and liver transplants [24] have been undertaken in NPD patients, but these treatments could not cure the disease. FDA has granted Enzyme Replacement Therapy, and now its effectiveness is evaluating. It appears, however, that this treatment is unlikely to have a profound effect on the disease’s neurological features [10].

Since the pathogenic factor for the two NPD types are mutations in the SMPD1 gene, systematically exploring the underlying mechanism that causes these two subtypes is necessary. Because the pathogenic mutations of the SMPD1 gene are primarily found in compound heterozygotes,investigating the phenotype-genotype association is the key to distinguishing the two subtypes [21, 22, 25, 26], hence, to enable families to understand better how the diagnosis affects their children’s health and well-being. Genotype-phenotype relationships for pathogenicity could be associated with the molecular basis, such as gene mutation and expression [27]. Therefore, it is hypothesised that various mutation sites of the SMPD1 gene and its expressions in various cells are associated with early-onset and late-onset phenotypes. Comprehensive analyses would help understand the mechanisms underlying the phenotypes [28] and information for the therapies. Therefore, in this study, we collected clinical cases reported in the literature and illustrated the landscape of mutations in SMPD1 to explore how those mutations affect the protein function, including the physical and chemical properties of the protein and ASM activity. In addition, we also applied several algorithms to predict variants that potentially cause dysfunction of the SMPD1 gene and result in NPD.

Results

Case collection

To thoroughly investigate the genotype-phenotype association in NPA and NPB, reported cases were extracted from the PubMed database through a manual curation process. A total of 144 cases with mutation information and additional 23 cases reporting ASM levels but lack of detailed mutation information of the patients were collected (the detailed information can be found in Supplementary Table S1), and the following data were extracted: onset age, sex, ethnicity, mutation site of SMPD1 gene, clinical phenotypes and symptoms, and ASM activity level for each case based on the standardised format and terms.

ASM activity level in the collected clinical cases

Currently, no conclusive criteria exist to identify NPA and NPB at the physiological and biochemical levels. A previous study reported that the ASM level in plasma could be used as an index to differentiate NPA from NPB in Chinese populations [29]. To test whether the ASM level in plasma as an index can be extended to other populations, we analysed the ASM levels in collected cases to find the threshold value to differentiate NPA from NPB based on the ratio of the ASM activity in patients to the reference constructed with healthy people (or normal ASM enzymes). When excluding the Chinese cases for this analysis, we then collected additional papers consisting of 23 non-Chinese cases (most of them are clinical reports) that reported ASM levels (in Supplementary Table S2). These additional papers are not used for phenotype-genotype correlation due to a lack of mutation information. Thus, 108 cases were included. As a result, NPA and NPB demonstrated a significant difference in ASM activities by t-test (p = 1.2 × 10−4, Fig. 1A), but no significant difference was found between the intermediate NPD and NPB. NPA can be differentiated from other subtypes (NPB and the intermediate group) at a threshold of 4.45% of ASM activity with an AUC value of 0.740, the Sensitivity of 0.800, a Specificity of 0.705, and Youden’s index of 0.505 (Fig. 1B) indicating that patients without neurological involvement normally have the ASM residual activity-to-control ratio over 0.045 (4.45%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A novel threshold for determining NPD subtypes. A ASM levels in clinical cases are collected. B ROC curve for the predictability of the threshold. ASM ratio, the ratio of the activity of acid sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase of the patients to the reference value; NPA, Niemann–Pick disease type A; NPB, Niemann–Pick disease type B; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC, area under the curve

Full size image

Mutations in the clinical cases collected

Normally, patients with NPA have high pathogenicity mutations in SMPD1, with early disease onset. Previous studies have demonstrated that patients with diverse NPD subtypes have significantly different severities [29, 30]. In the present study, we collected 144 cases and showed that the onset age for most patients with NPA was between 0 and 10 months (less than 1 year), while the onset age of patients with NPB was aggregated between 0 and 200 months (16.7 years) (Fig. 2A). Among those patients, sixty patients with NPD lived in Mediterranean countries, including Italy, Algeria, Spain, Turkey, Maghreb, Jordan, and North Africa. All 22 patients from Europe were Caucasians, Polish, Gypsy or Dutch. Thirty-five patients with NPD have Asian backgrounds (China and Japan) (Fig. 2B). In the cases collected, there were more patients with NPD from the Mediterranean area, although the results might be biased during the case collection from PubMed. From these cases, the most common mutation is p.Arg608del, followed by p.Arg3AlafsX76 and p.Arg610del (Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Statistics of the mutation sites on the SMPD1 gene. A Distribution of the patients by onset age. F, female. M, male. B Country of origin of the patients: Mediterranean countries, including Italy, Algeria, Spain, Turkey, Maghreb, Jordan, and North Africa; Asian countries, such as China and Japan; European countries, such as Caucasian (documented by the research), Poland, Gypsy (documented by the research), and the Netherlands; Middle East countries including Iran and Palestine. C Amino acid mutation frequency in all collected cases. D SMPD1 mutation types (do not include all mutations). Severe mutations include deletions, insertions, and nonsense. E SMPD1 mutation distribution in domains of ASM domains in each subtype of NPD. A, NPA. AB, intermediate NPD subtype. B, NPB. F Distribution of missense mutations on the conserved domain of the human ASM protein. Each point represents one reported mutation in the collected cases. Points are coloured according to the domains. G The landscape of SMPD1 mutations and 21 novel pathogenic variants prediction based on the databases of ClinVar, ANNOVAR and the EVE model. Purple squares, novel predicted pathogenic variants. Orange triangles, pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants from the ClinVar. Domains were annotated by NCBI. Please note: in A, E panels, A, NPA. AB, intermediate. B, NPB. In D, F, and G, domains were retrieved from the NCBI (NP_000534.3), namely, saposin (B) (smart00741, Location: 89 → 161), metallophosphatase domain (cd00842, Location: 202 → 497) and Calcineurin-like phosphoesterase domain (Metallophos for short, pfam00149, Location: 255 → 462)

Full size image

It has been noticed that different mutation types would lead to distinct phenotypes of NPD; therefore, the different types of mutations were annotated (Fig. 2D). Duplications, nonsense mutation, deletions and insertions are considered severe mutations, while missenses are mild to severe ones. About 50% of the mutations belong to the severe type in NPA in the collected cases, a higher prevalence than that in NPB (42% roughly). The mild mutations counted for 57% of all mutations in NPB, higher than the frequency in NPA. Of all the annotated missense mutations, over 70% occurred in the metallophosphatase domain, while only a tiny portion of missense mutation happened in Saposin (B) Domains (Fig. 2E&F).

Pathogenicity at different sites in SMPD1

ANNOVAR is a software tool that utilises genetic and evolutionary information to annotate genetic variants detected from diverse genomes functionally. A total of 1203 variants of the SMPD1 gene have been annotated in ANNOVAR. We retrieved their corresponding SIFT_score, Polyphen2_HVAR _score, Polyphen2_HDIV_score, MutationTaster, M-CAP score and CADD_Phred. We also collected the annotation information for SMPD1 variants from the ClinVar database; 591 variants in the ClinVar and 203 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in exon regions were filtered and mapped in the diagrammatic sketch (Fig. 2G). There are 44 variants annotated in the ANNOVAR but not the ClinVar database. Following the pathogenicity threshold defined by their corresponding authors (SIFT_score < 0.05, Polyphen2_HDIV_score > =0.957, MetaLR_score > 0.5, CADD_phred> 20, and M-CAP_score > 0.025 and disease_causing labelled by MutationTaster_pred), 38 of the 44 variants are annotated as pathogenicity (Supplementary Table S3), but none of them has been reported in literature. In addition, eight variants, including c.G491T, c.G1026T, c.C1279A, c.C1288G, c.C1288T, c.T1309C, c.A1351C and c.A1382C, were not found in the gnomAD and other variants frequency were relatively low, only 3 (c.G394T, c.C995A, and c.C1598A) were annotated in Han Chinese people (Huabiao), which indicated the population-specific pattern for some mutations.

Next, we adapted a deep learning algorithm, the EVE model, to further predict the clinical significance of those mutations in SMPD1 gene. EVE is a new method to predict the clinical significance of human variants based on sequences of diverse organisms across evolution [30]. With the EVE model, 23 of the 44 variants were predicted to be pathogenic. Among the 44 variants, 21 were predicted to be pathogenic with both methods (their locations are shown in Fig. 2G roughly).

Differences in the distribution of variant sites among different ethnicities

To survey whether the mutation profile in the SMPD1 gene has any ethnic prevalence, we first plotted the top 20 variants that have been annotated as pathogenic/likely pathogenic ones according to their allele frequency (Fig. 3A). Among 36 pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations detected in gnomAD (Fig. 3B), p.Arg610del has been found in nearly all ethnicities. The variants at the 498th amino acid (missense and changed to His or Leu), namely p.Arg498His or p.Arg498Leu, share the second place. p.His461ArgfsTer3 was found specific to African/African Americans. The Jewish people carry a unique variant, p.Leu304Pro, while p.Ala195SerfsTer14, p.Arg364Gly and p.Pro155Arg are the three variants specifically reported in East Asians. There are two unique mutations in Finnish populations. South Asians carry three protein changes induced by single nucleotide variants.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pathogenic variants allele distribution. A Top 20 pathogenic variants in gnomAD. B Frequency of the pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants with population specificity in gnomAD. AAA, African/African American. AJ, Ashkenazi Jewish. EA, East Asian. ENF, European (non-Finnish). FIN, Finnish. LAA, Latino/Admixed American. SA, South Asian. C SMPD1 mutation allele frequency in two data sources. Huabiao, the public project database of whole exomes of the Chinese Han. EA, data from east Asia of the gnomAD

Full size image

We further explored whether any significant difference could be observed between the Han Chinese group and other East Asians. Comparing gnomAD and Huabiao databases, we have found that the allele frequency of 24 variants was differently recorded (Fig. 3C). For example, the variants occurring at sites of 6,411,878 (p.Arg17Gln or p.Arg17Pro), 6,411,954 (p.Ala44_Leu49del) and 6,415,243 (p.Ser486Arg) in gnomAD were nearly 0, but in Huabiao, they were more frequent. In contrast, the frequency at the mutation sites of 6,412,081 and 6,412,854 was much higher than that of the variants in the Huabiao. Additionally, in the East Asian people (the subtype of the gnomAD), the 24 mutation sites have not been included.

Phenotype-genotype correlation

In this analysis, 144 cases with correspondingly detailed documentation of the complete mutation information were utilised.

Different variations are associated with different phenotypes

The amino acid glycine at site 247, located in the conserved metallophosphatase domain, is a highly prevalent mutation site affected by nucleotide changes of c.740delG, c.741delG, and c.739G > A in 7 patients. Variations at this site have been associated with NPA [31,32,33]. Patients hosting the deletions (c.740delG or c.741delG) and c.739G > A show disease onset age less than 6 months and died by the age 3 years old, which result in a global developmental delay, seizure, psychosis, and other nervous system-related diseases, together with the liver- and spleen-related symptoms. In contrast, patients with most missense mutations at glycine site 247 were not diagnosed with NPA but NPB (mean onset age: 45.6 ± 10.9 years)., except c.739G > A and c.1159 T > C (p.[Cys387Arg]). Similarly, patients with homozygous or heterozygous variants c.1828_1830delCGC (p.Arg610del) were all associated with NPB without nervous system involvement.

Recurrent variants of c.4delC (p.Arg3AlafsX76) and c.842-849dup8 (p.His284SerfsX17) in Chinese origin correlates with NPA/B or the intermediate

Among all 28 reported variants in our collection, c.4delC (p.Arg3AlafsX76) and c.842-849dup8 (p.His284SerfsX17) in Chinese patients have high prevalence [34]. The duplication variant occurs in six patients (mean onset age: 2.5 ± 1.6 months) with seven alleles. The mean of ASM activities was significantly low (5.5 ± 0.67% to the reference). Psychomotor regression and hypotonia were the main phenotypes related to the nervous system of patients with the mutation. For deletion of c.4delC (p.Arg3AlafsX76), nine alleles were detected in six patients. Although the deletion variants can cause severe ASM dysfunction, Chinese patients with one variant on the alleles (heterozygous) were diagnosed with the intermediate type, indicating haploinsufficiency, while patients with homozygous alleles (two c.4delC on the alleles) were diagnosed with NPB. This gene mutation appeared non-neurotoxic as the detected ASM activity was relatively high (mean 25 %  ± 0.56%). Thus, the two variants mentioned above are associated with the discrimination of the NPD.

Variants of c.1823_1825delCCG (p.R608del) correlate with the NPB phenotype

Among our collected cases, 14 patients had at least one SMPD1 p.R608del allele variant (homozygous, n = 9; heterozygous, n = 5) associated with NPB clinical phenotypes [35,36,37]. Interestingly, 13 of these patients were reported to live in Mediterranean countries (Italy, Algeria, Spain, Turkey, etc.). This variant has not been reported from people living in other areas except America. Nearly all patients with homozygous or heterozygous mutations survive to adulthood, with the oldest patient 60 years old. None of them was reported to have neurological diseases, and most of them had active ASM. Thus, c.1823_1825delCCG (p.R608del) variants are primarily associated with NPB in Mediterranean patients, and the deletion of amino acid proline has a minor impact on the patients since it happens near the C-terminal of the protein.

The expression pattern of the SMPD1 gene

Gene performs its functions only in the cells/tissues it expresses. To comprehensively explore the tissues affected by SMPD1 gene mutations, we collected the expression pattern of the SMPD1 gene from the GTEx portal and Descartes database. GTEx is a data resource and tissue bank that currently includes approximately 11,688 RNA-seq samples across 53 tissue sites, and the Descartes database contains the gene expressions of over 4 million cells of 121 human tissues during development. Since hepatosplenomegaly and splenomegaly are the most commonly observed clinical syndrome of NPB and higher incidence of neuronopathy with rapid progressive psychomotor deterioration are reported in NPA, we mainly focused on the expression patterns of SMPD1 in the brain, liver, and spleen.

Considering that NPA is the most severe clinical form with early-onset CNS involvement, we believed that dysfunctions caused by pathogenic mutations of the SMPD1 gene could significantly affect fetal development and functions of related organs. Therefore, we evaluated the expression patterns of the SMPD1 gene in various fetal tissues from the Descartes database (Fig. 4). The single-cell dataset of fetuses in the Descartes database is generated from 121 human fetal samples of 72–129 days in estimated postconceptual age and represents 15 organs in Fig. 4 [38]. As a result, we observed that the SMPD1 gene is nearly expressed in all studied fetal organs, and the highest expression level is found in CLC_IL5RA-positive cells of the heart, followed by endocrine cells in pancreatic islets, endocardial cells, retinal microglia, and megakaryocytes in the kidney in Fig. 4. The expression pattern of SMPD1 in these organs indicates that SMPD1 dysfunction should significantly affect the functions and development of the heart, pancreatic islets, eyes, and kidneys. The highest expression level of the SMPD1 gene in liver is detected in hepatoblast cells, followed by hematopoietic stem cells. In the spleen, the highest expression level was observed in STC2_TLX1-positive cells, followed by mesothelial cells. In the brain, the highest expression level was found in the vascular endothelial cells of the cerebellum, followed by the vascular endothelial cells of the cerebrum and astrocytes of the cerebellum. In the cerebellum, SMPD1 presented a relatively low expression profile in astrocytes, Purkinje neurons, SLC24A4_PEX5L-positive cells, oligodendrocytes, and microglia. A similar expression profile was observed for SMPD1 in inhibitory neurons, astrocytes, limbic system neurons, oligodendrocytes and microglia of the cerebrum. In terms of protein expression, in the female postnatal brain, SPMD1 protein is expressed the most in the medial dorsal nucleus of the thalamus, followed by the hippocampus and primary visual cortex [39] in Fig. 6B. Interestingly, SMPD1 was highly expressed in the placenta; the highest expression level was found in IGFBP1_DKK1-positive cells, followed by PAEP_MECOM-positive cells and myeloid cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SMPD1 gene expression in all tissues. Expression profiles of the SMPD1 gene in different organs based on the GSE156793

Full size image

According to the expression patterns of the SMPD1 gene in various tissues from GTEx (Fig. 5), thyroid tissue was found to have the highest expression of SMPD1, followed by the pituitary, aorta, cerebellum, lungs, skin exposed to the sun, cerebellar hemisphere, kidney cortex, tibial nerve, and coronary artery. At the protein level, the thyroid ranked 2nd in all studied tissues (Fig. 6A). The protein also demonstrated higher expression in the cerebellum, lungs, and kidney than in other tissues. In Fig. 5, the liver is ranked 13th among 53 tissues, while the spleen is ranked 20th. These two organs were all found with the expression at the protein level. Kushner et al. [40] retrospectively analysed proteomics data and found SMPD1 expression aggregated in the region of substantia nigra Fig. 6C. Then, the tissues studied in both GTEx and ProteomicsDB were retrieved and their correlation between between ASM expression at both protein and gene level were significant (r = 0.69, p < 0.05, Fig. 6D). The correlation indicates that transcriptome profiles would be a tool for understanding the pathogenic mechanisms underlying NPA and NPB.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression profiles of the SMPD1 gene based on GTEx data

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Expression profile of the SMPD1 protein with the help of the public datasets. A SMPD1 protein expression in Wang et al. B SMPD1 protein expression in the study of Carlyle et al. C SMPD1 protein expression in the study of Kushner et al. D Correlation analysis between the ASM expression at both protein and gene level by spearman. Tissues studied were the consensus with GTEx and ProteomicsDB

Full size image

To explore the pathways when the SMPD1 deficient fibroblasts were under stress, we retrieved a dataset that the mRNAs of NPA patients’ cells were profiled, where the cells had been treated with sphingolipid sphingomyelin (SM) for 30 days compared to the control group. Figure 7A illustrates the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (the treated cells vs the control cells).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Pathways involved in NPA fibroblasts cells in response to sphingomyelin treatment. A DEGs illustrated with a volcano plot. B CASP7, PRKCD and SMPD1 expression following the SM treatment. *, p < 0.05. C Enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) terms withtop 50 DEGS. Oxidoreductase activity 1, oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen. Oxidoreductase activity 2, oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with oxidation of a pair of donors resulting in the reduction of molecular oxygen to two molecules of water. BP, biological process. CC, cellular component. MF, molecular function

Full size image

Upon cleavage by CASP7 in the extracellular milieu, the active form is generated [41]. Stress-induced phosphorylation of Ser-510, required for secretion, is catalyzed by PRKCD protein [42, 43]. Therefore, we explored CASP7, PRKCD and SMPD1 expression following the SM treatment (Fig. 7B). PRKCD expression was dropped significantly, indicating the phosphorylation of Ser-510 were not active following the SM treatment. Based on the function analysis with the top 50 DEGs (Log2FoldChange > 2 & FDR < 0.01) (Fig. 7C), it showed that following the treatment, the metabolic process and the regulation of lipid and alcohol were active, and endolysosome was involved when the cells were under stress (response to organonitrogen compound).

Discussion

In the present study, we tried to comprehensively explore the association of phenotype-genotype in NPD and lay the foundation for understanding the mechanisms of this rare disease. With the strict quality-controlled literature search, we collected 144 cases with comprehensive pathophysiological characteristics of NPD. We also found a connection between some variants and the phenotypes (NPD type A or B). Type A is correlated with more severe mutations, while patients with the non-neuro-related type NPB normally have mutations in SMPD1 with a mild effect. In addition, following the model, we have found a threshold of 4.45% that it can be taken into account to discriminate the majority of cases with NPA from clinical phenotypes less severe of NPD (intermediate and NPB). Furthermore, we also explored the expression landscape of the SMPD1 in different cell types of fetal development and adult tissues, which offered us the opportunities to better understand pathogenic mechanisms underlying NPA and NPB at a single cell type level. At the same time, the difference in SMPD1 expression levels on different cell types provides an important resource for the precise diagnosis of the disease in clinical application.

The ASM protein, encoded by SMPD1 gene, catalyses the degradation of sphingomyelin into ceramide and phosphocholine [42, 44]. Following the SMPD1 gene’s transcription, in the endoplasmic reticulum, an inactive 75-kDa pre-pro-polypeptide of 631 residues is synthesised from the 1896-bp open reading frame of the full-length human SMPD1 cDNA [45]. It has been found that in the extracellular milieu, more SMPD1 proteins should have been produced, but the expression of SMPD1 was not correspondingly changed under SM stress. CASP7 gene’ encoding a protein that cleaves SMPD1 [41], expression is not significantly changed either. Here, we indeed observe significant drop of PRKCD expression, its protein, PKC δ, is required for phosphorylating SMPD1 protein for its secretion. Zeidan and Hannun suggested the existence of a positive feedback loop between PKC δ production and downstream ceramide formation [43]. Since the residual SMPD1 proteins still can convert SM into ceramide and ceramide metabolized by other pathways, a reduced expression of PRKCD appeared to be reasonable. One form of SMPD1 proteins targets the endolysosomal compartment; the other is released extracellularly [42, 44]. In normal state, as a result of signal peptide cleavage, the precursor undergoes processing in the Endoplasmic Reticulum/Golgi complex to produce a catalytic form of 70 kDa entering endosome/lysosome [45]. The extracellularly released SMPD1 proteins in the form of lysosomal exocytosis as the primary source under specific stimulations and circumstances [46, 47]. This notion correlates with the results that the endolysosome and its membrane also participate in the process (Fig. 7C). Within the data of GO enrichment, the response to the organonitrogen compound was also found, when the NPA cells were treated with SM. As suggested, SMPD1 proteins also facilitates cholesterol [48]; therefore, it has been found that regulation and metabolic processes of alcohol, lipid and cholesterol were also involved in the cells under SM stress. These pathways together would participate into relieving the toxic effects of accumulation of SM, although the complete functions of SMPD1 protein remains to be investigated.

The residual ASM activity has been regarded as one of the clinical features to distinguish NPA from NPB in Chinese people [29], while some bibliographic data that supports ASM residual activity threshold is not definitive for discriminating between type A and B [49,50,51]. Commonly, < 5% of effective residual ASM activity in situ is observed in NPA, whereas 5–20% is detected in NPB [22, 52,53,54]. However, in the literature we have mined, > 5% of the cases were still diagnosed as NPA [35, 55, 56]. Several intermediate cases indicated that the residual activities of the ASM enzyme were broad [49, 57]. Therefore, the ASM activity is not always associated with the so-called well-defined subtypes. Our model indicated that 4.45% of ASM activity could be the threshold to distinguish NPA from other subtypes. However, Hu et al. suggested that the cutoff value for differentiating the two clinical forms was 1.685 nmol/17 h/mg protein (approximately 12.2% to the reference, 13.7 nmol/17 h/mg protein as the reference value in Chinese patients only, and all ASM activities were measured within single laboratory using the same method) [29]. Although the SMPD1 gene sequencing appears to be a golden standard for NPD diagnosis, which should not be used as a first-line indicator [10], the method might be less available in less-developed regions. It is still recommended to examine ASM activity as a standard for deficiency diagnosis [58]. The threshold proposed in the present study was derived from multinational samples (i.e., leukocytes, skin fibroblasts, or dried blood spots) and different ethnic groups [59] with different measurement approaches to ASM activity, which further indicates that ASM activity is a common feature used to differentiate NPA from other subtypes for counselling, prognostication, and the interpretation.

SMPD1 gene mutations have been reported in many countries and ethnic groups, and mutation prevalence varies from one ethnic group to another [21, 31, 33, 34, 36, 55]. In this study, we observed frequency differences in the same sites of SMPD1 protein between the East Asians in gnomAD and Han Chinese in the “Huabiao” project (Fig. 3C). In the gnomAD, the most common variant in East Asians is p.Lys189GlnfsTer4 (c.564dup), while p.Glu508Lys (c.1522G > A) is the most common one in Han Chinese. Besides, the high-frequency mutation sites of the SMPD1 gene highly vary in different populations reported in the literature, such as Ashkenazi Jews, Italians, Spanish, Turks, Chinese, and Dutch. Moreover, p.F333SfsX52, p.L304P, and p.R498L are the most common SMPD1 gene mutations among Ashkenazi Jews, which are more likely to cause NPA [60, 61]. This difference in the mutation frequency may also contribute to a massive difference in the prevalence of NPA and NPB in various ethnicities and cause different phenotypes. Globally, the most common mutation is p.Arg610del, which has been associated with NPB [34, 62]. Similarly, p.Arg610del is also dominant in our collected cases. In contrast, the most common mutations among Chinese patients are p.Arg3AlafsX76 and p.H284SfsX7 [34].

Furthermore, with the two databases, ClinVar and ANNOVAR, and a deep learning algorithm, the EVE model, to improve the reliability, we predict 21 unreported variants that could be pathogenic [63], which can provide new information to interpret the related variants in SMPD1 gene testing for NPD. The comparison of two databases shows the frequency of variant sites of the SMPD1 gene in the Chinese Han group is different from Huabiao to the east Asian in the gnomAD. It is believed that these high-risk mutations might lead to spontaneous abortion as the SMPD1 gene expression is high in the CNS system during development. Only a few pathogenic variants have been found in the Sap B domain, in NPA, NPB or the intermediate subtypes. Ponting suggested that ASM’s Sap B domain was homologous to the Saposin B protein responsible for the lysosomal degradation of several sphingomyelinases and five other known molecules [64]. Although the necessity might be unclear [65], Saposin B protein could activate and boost the degradation of many glycolipids and glycerolipids, unlike its other family members of Saposin A, C, and D, which adopt the high specificity to some proteins [64, 65]. It implies that the changes in the Sap B domain seem to disrupt the non-peptide bonds connecting amino acids, such as disulfide bonds, which does not cause a complete loss of ASM function [22]. Thus, it safely infers that SapB deficiency does not lead to NPA/NPB. This notion correlates with other reports that the changes in this domain could lead to intermediate or non-neurological types of ASM deficiency [36, 66]. 66.67% of variants are found in the calcineurin-like phosphoesterase domain (from 255th to 462nd amino acid). Sphingomyelin degradation was included in this type of phosphodiesterase superfamily, demonstrating that the amino acid changes due to variants would impact the function of the ASM and finally lead to the severe phenotype, NPA or the milder one, NPB. Metallo-dependent phosphatase-like domain (202nd to 497th amino acid) found 80.95% of the variants. This domain is associated with metabolite damage control [67]. Hence, if the variants occur in these domains, it is highly likely to lead to LSD, even NPD [65].

Studies that comprehensively expounded pathways related to NPD are barely found. In the present results, within the data above, we infer that the following scenario could be the mechanisms underlying NPD. The expression profiles of SMPD1 in cells and tissues in healthy people help explain the complex symptoms of NPD. We can further connect the clinical phenotypes to the mutation pattern based on the SMPD1 expression profiles in fetal and adult tissues. ASM is an enzyme essential for neurodevelopment. Normally, the mutations in the catalytic domain of SMPD1 have severe pathogenic effects because the lost catalytic function of the enzyme can significantly decrease ASM activity, which causes the accumulation of sphingomyelin and other sphingolipids that are toxic at elevated and nonphysiological levels. The clinical manifestations include rapid progressive psychomotor deterioration, liver and spleen enlargement, respiratory disease, jaundice, and death within 3 years [29, 33, 68]. Liver and spleen enlargement could be a compensation mechanism for the body to sustain ASM activities. Considering that SMPD1 is universally expressed in many different cell types and tissues, it is expected that the dysfunction of SMPD1 protein should have a significant impact on many tissues, indicating that symptoms of NPD should present in the whole body without much specificity. The phenotypes reported in NPD are consistent with short stature, osteoporosis, sea-blue histiocytosis, microcytic anaemia, and bone-marrow foam cells. The expression profile of SMPD1 in various cell types during development and various adult tissues can help us comprehensively decipher the potentially affected cell types and tissues of SMPD1 mutation, which might have been ignored clinically. In addition, according to its expression profile, SMPD1 is highly expressed in the heart, pancreas, thyroid, and kidneys during fetal development, which indicates that the dysfunction of the SMPD1 gene should have possibly influenced these organs and the related phenotypes such as renal involvement in NPD is rarely reported [69, 70]. Therefore, in clinical application, clinicians are recommended to conduct comprehensive examinations while diagnosing patients with potential NPD, paying attention to the pathological abnormalities of these organs, during fetal development hepatosplenomegaly, splenomegaly, and neurological abnormalities.

We further reasoned that potential pathogeny at a gene level could correlate with the types of mutations owing to the positive correlation between gene expression and protein expression in Fig. 6D. Severe mutations resulting from deletion or insertion and stop gain led to the premature termination of the synthesis of the polypeptide chain of the SMPD1 gene, or mutated polypeptide chains produce enzymes without biological activity or barely active domains (finally aberrant development) [71]. In patients with NPB, a single missense mutation only changes an amino acid, resulting in defective ASM with partial catalytic activity. Therefore, the ASM activity of NPB is higher than that of NPA, which explains the perspective that patients with NPA/NPB have the same pathogenic mutated genes, but the clinical manifestations are quite different. The pathogenic mutations of the SMPD1 gene are primarily found in compound heterozygotes; the phenotype-genotype association study is particularly complicated. Therefore, the gene expression profiles of the SMPD1 in different cell types of fetal development and adult tissues could further clarify which cell types are response to the dysfunction of tissues and the symptoms of the disease, which is important resource for understanding the pathogenic mechanisms underlying NPA and NPB. The period from 2 weeks post-conception to early childhood is crucial for developing the brain and other CNS organs [72]. Large amounts of sphingomyelin are needed to be converted to develop non-CNS cells [72]. In the present study, the expression pattern of SMPD1 (Fig. 4) in various cell types of fetal demonstrated that SMPD1 dysfunction should significantly affect the functions and development of the circulatory system (heart and kidneys) and nervous system, which are essential for the survival of the fetal and infants. The placenta, vital to support fetal growth, also presents a high SMPD1 gene expression. The individual clinical symptoms strongly correlate with the severity of SMPD1 mutations, as the mutations would result in the functional decrease or even loss of the ASM activity in those cell types. Once those mutations cause decreased or the forfeit ability of ASM results in the ASM substrates, the sphingomyelin, accumulation, which would negatively affect individual fetuses. Finally, the excessive amount of accumulated sphingomyelin might lead to NPD phenotypes at an early age (namely, Type A) or the NPB (the late-onset phenotype). Among 53 adult tissues, the expression of SMPD1 is relatively high in the liver and the spleen (the liver ranked 13, and the spleen ranked 20, in Fig. 5), which also suggests high levels of sphingomyelin in both tissues. Individuals with low ASM activities might not be able to convert sphingomyelin timely; thus, patients with NPA and NPB are featured with progressive hepatosplenomegaly and other organ dysfunction [33, 56, 73].

Our study is the first to comprehensively elucidate the effects of SMPD1 mutation on cell types and at the tissue level, which provides new insights into the genotype-phenotype association and can help in the precise diagnosis of NPD. Admittedly, our study has certain limitations; the number of cases included in this study is relatively small, which could influence the AUC results; more cases should improve the model’s performance. In this study, we fail to comprehensively detect the relationship between phenotypes and genotypes because of incomplete phenotype data from some reported cases. In addition, we found the area or ethnicity specificity to the frequency of the variants, but it should be noted that some mutations with population or area-specific prevalence could also result from the bias of case study and collection. However, we compared the frequency of the variants collected to the public databases, gnomAD and the results are consistent. For example, p.Arg610del are the most frequent variant in the documented ASMD patients (gnomAD databases) and the cases we collected. It would be essential to check the SMPD1 protein levels in different tissues and other protein expressions during SMPD1 secretion and genome-wide association studies [74] which could further explain the mechanism underlying ASMD.

Conclusions

As a rare disease, symptoms of NPD are scattered in the whole body without much specificity. It is often misdiagnosed in different specialities. Many researchers have reported that patients with the same mutation site in a candidate pathogenetic gene always have different phenotypes; we also observe similar events in patients with NPD, indicating that other unidentified factors can contribute to the clinical manifestation. Therefore, caution should be taken when interpreting the effect of gene mutation on inherited diseases. It can be anticipated that with the whole genome sequence technology being gradually applied to the clinical diagnosis field, comprehensively deciphering the underlying mechanism for inherited disease will be a routine procedure with which the genetic factors and their interaction with diseases will be fully illustrated. It is also suggested that noninvasive prenatal testing with the whole genome sequence technology [74] could be incorporated into the national healthcare program that has reduced the prevalence of inherited diseases in China; thus, the prediction for pathogenicity will also be improved with the application of deep learning [75].

Materials and methods

Case collection

We searched PubMed using ‘Niemann-Pick disease’ and ‘mutation’ as keywords. We selected the data with a clear statement of the patient’s information (age, gender, nationality or ethnicity background etc.) and the corresponding types of NPD, mutation sites, clinical symptoms and/or ASM level.

Data source

A dataset of GSE199194 [76] was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). We obtained three mass spectrometry datasets of ASM protein expression, whose authors are Kushner et al. [40], Wang et al. [77] and Carlyle et al. [39] from the website Expression Atlas [78]. Proteins expression of ASM were identified from proteomicsDB (www.proteomicsdb.org), which contains a repository of human proteome information [79,80,81] .

Cuttoff value to distinguish NPA and NPB based on ASM activity

The “pROC” package (version 0.2.3) in R (version 3.6.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to analyse ASM ratio data (the ratio of ASM activity in patients to the reference value of healthy people that the authors of the publications stated) to classify response groups and visualised by “ggplot2” R package. The predictive performance of each model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). The t-test was used to test whether ASM activity has a difference between the two groups, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Pathogenicity annotation for mutations in the SMPD1 gene

SMPD1 has been confirmed to cause NPA and NPB. To date, many mutation sites have been detected in patients with NPD. To comprehensively identify pathogenic mutations in SMPD1 that cause NPD, a pathogenicity analysis was conducted for all potential mutation sites in SMPD1 genes with ANNOVAR (https://annovar.openbioinformatics.org/en) [82]. The annotated pathogenetic effect of each mutation in SMPD1 was retrieved from ClinVar. PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) was used to predict the pathogenic effect of missense on the protein. EVE scores for the SMPD1 variants in proteins sequence were retrieved from the EVE model (https://evemodel.org/proteins/ASM_HUMAN) [30].

To comprehensively detect the mutation profile of SMPD1, we extracted the mutation frequency of SMPD1 from the gnomAD (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The Han Chinese populations’ allele frequency of SMPD1 was obtained from Huabiao (https://www.biosino.org/wepd).

The expression pattern of the SMPD1 gene in various cell types and tissues

The expression patterns of SMPD1 in adult tissues were extracted from the GTEx portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/), and the expression patterns of SMPD1 at the cell type level were downloaded from Descartes (https://descartes.brotmanbaty.org/). GTEx is a data resource and tissue bank used to investigate the relationship between genetic variation and gene expression in human tissues. The currently released platform includes genotype data from approximately 714 donors and 11,688 RNA-seq samples across 53 tissue sites. The Descartes database hosted the human gene expressions of over 4 million cells of 121 human tissues during fetal development. Fetal gene expressions of SMPD1 in different cells were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus platform (GSE156793).

Differentially expressed genes between the treatment and the control group from the GSE199194

Empirical Analysis of Digital Gene Expression Data in R [83] is a differential expression screening method based on a negative binomial distribution generalised linear model, and here we used the R package “edgR” (version 3.34.0) for differential analysis to obtain differential expression genes between treated groups and controls.

Functional analysis

We selected the top 50 DEGs with Log2FoldChange > 2 with FDR < 0.01 for gene set function enrichment analysis. We used Gene Ontology (GO) annotations of genes from the R package “org.Hs.eg.db” (version 3.1.0) as background, mapped genes to the background set, and performed enrichment analysis using the R package “clusterProfiler” [84] (version 3.14.3) to obtain the results of gene set enrichment. The minimum gene set was set to 5, and the maximum gene set to 5000; a FDR of< 0.01, were considered statistically significant.

Statistical analysis

R software (version 3.6.1) was used to conduct all statistical analyses. p < 0.05 is seen as the significant difference.

Availability of data and materials

All data are submitted within the paper.

Abbreviations

ASM:

Acid sphingomyelinase

CNS:

Central nervous system

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

GD :

Gaucher’s disease

GO:

Gene Ontology

KD :

Krabbe disease

LSD:

Lysosome storage disease

ML:

Metachromatic Leukodystrophy

NPD:

Niemann–Pick disease

NPA:

NPD type A

NPB:

NPD type B

SM:

Sphingolipid sphingomyelin

References

  1. Heller G, Bradbury AM, Sands MS, Bongarzone ER. Preclinical studies in Krabbe disease: a model for the investigation of novel combination therapies for lysosomal storage diseases. Mol Ther. 2023;31(1):7–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.09.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Horowitz M, Braunstein H, Zimran A, Revel-Vilk S, Goker-Alpan O. Lysosomal functions and dysfunctions: molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying Gaucher disease and its association with Parkinson disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;187:114402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2022.114402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kampine JP, Brady RO, Kanfer JN, Feld M, Shapiro D. Diagnosis of gaucher's disease and niemann-pick disease with small samples of venous blood. Science. 1967;155(3758):86–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3758.86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martins AM, Valadares ER, Porta G, Coelho J, Semionato Filho J, Pianovski MA, et al. Recommendations on diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for Gaucher disease. J Pediatr. 2009;155(4 Suppl):S10–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ron I, Horowitz M. ER retention and degradation as the molecular basis underlying Gaucher disease heterogeneity. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(16):2387–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawkar AR, Cheng WC, Beutler E, Wong CH, Balch WE, Kelly JW. Chemical chaperones increase the cellular activity of N370S beta -glucosidase: a therapeutic strategy for Gaucher disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(24):15428–33. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192582899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Krabbe K. A new familial, infantile form of diffuse brain-sclerosis. Brain. 1916;39(1–2):74–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cesani M, Lorioli L, Grossi S, Amico G, Fumagalli F, Spiga I, et al. Mutation update of ARSA and PSAP genes causing metachromatic Leukodystrophy. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(1):16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22919.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vanier MT. Niemann-pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-5-16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuchman EH, Desnick RJ. Types A and B Niemann-pick disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2017;120(1–2):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.12.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brady RO, Kanfer JN, Mock MB, Fredrickson DS. The metabolism of sphingomyelin. II. Evidence of an enzymatic deficiency in Niemann-pick diseae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966;55(2):366–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.55.2.366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vanier MT. Niemann–pick diseases. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;113:1717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. de Frutos LL, Cebolla JJ, Irún P, Köhler R, Giraldo P. The erythrocyte osmotic resistance test as screening tool for cholesterol-related lysosomal storage diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;480:161–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Greer WL, Riddell DC, Gillan TL, Girouard GS, Sparrow SM, Byers DM, et al. The Nova Scotia (type D) form of Niemann-pick disease is caused by a G3097→T Transversion in NPC1. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(1):52–4. https://doi.org/10.1086/301931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Li G, Su B, Fu P, Bai Y, Ding G, Li D, et al. NPC1-regulated dynamic of clathrin-coated pits is essential for viral entry. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65(2):341–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-1929-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuchman E, Desnick R. Niemann-pick disease types A and B: acid sphingomyelinase deficiencies. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D, editors. The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001. p. 3589–610.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou Y-F, Metcalf MC, Garman SC, Edmunds T, Qiu H, Wei RR. Human acid sphingomyelinase structures provide insight to molecular basis of Niemann–pick disease. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):13082. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13082.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan JW, Jones CS, Davidson DJ, Shankaran P. The active site of lysosomal sphingomyelinase: evidence for the involvement of hydrophobic and ionic groups. J Neurosci Res. 1983;10(2):151–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490100205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Charruyer A, Grazide S, Bezombes C, Müller S, Laurent G, Jaffrézou JP. UV-C light induces raft-associated acid sphingomyelinase and JNK activation and translocation independently on a nuclear signal. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(19):19196–204. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M412867200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falcone S, Perrotta C, De Palma C, Pisconti A, Sciorati C, Capobianco A, et al. Activation of acid sphingomyelinase and its inhibition by the nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate pathway: key events in Escherichia coli-elicited apoptosis of dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2004;173(7):4452–63. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.7.4452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nasereddin A, Ereqat S. Deep sequencing of SMPD1 gene revealed a heterozygous frameshift mutation (p.Ser192Alafs) in a Palestinian infant with Niemann–pick disease type a: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):272. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-018-1805-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ota S, Noguchi A, Kondo D, Nakajima Y, Ito T, Arai H, et al. An early-onset Neuronopathic form of acid Sphingomyelinase deficiency: a SMPD1 p.C133Y mutation in the Saposin domain of acid Sphingomyelinase. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020;250(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.250.5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Victor S, Coulter JBS, Besley GTN, Ellis I, Desnick RJ, Schuchman EH, et al. Niemann–pick disease: sixteen-year follow-up of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in a type B variant. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2003;26(8):775–85. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOLI.0000009950.81514.c8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coelho GR, Praciano AM, Rodrigues JP, Viana CF, Brandão KP, Valenca JT Jr, et al. Liver transplantation in patients with Niemann-pick disease--single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2015;47(10):2929–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.10.051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheema HA, Rasool IG, Anjum MN, Zahoor MY. Mutational spectrum of SMPD1 gene in Pakistani Niemann-pick disease patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):479–84. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.3.467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ordieres-Ortega L, Galeano-Valle F, Mallén-Pérez M, Muñoz-Delgado C, Apaza-Chavez JE, Menárguez-Palanca FJ, et al. Niemann-pick disease type-B: a unique case report with compound heterozygosity and complicated lipid management. BMC Med Genet. 2020;21(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-020-01027-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li G, Eriani G, Wang ED, Zhou XL. Distinct pathogenic mechanisms of various RARS1 mutations in Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64(10):1645–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1838-2. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang X, Man Y, Zhuang X, Shen J, Zhang Y, Cui Y, et al. Plant multiscale networks: charting plant connectivity by multi-level analysis and imaging techniques. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64(9):1392–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1910-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu J, Maegawa GHB, Zhan X, Gao X, Wang Y, Xu F, et al. Clinical, biochemical, and genotype-phenotype correlations of 118 patients with Niemann-pick disease types A/B. Hum Mutat. 2021;42(5):614–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.24192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Frazer J, Notin P, Dias M, Gomez A, Min JK, Brock K, et al. Disease variant prediction with deep generative models of evolutionary data. Nature. 2021;599(7883):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04043-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Galehdari H, Tangestani R, Ghasemian S. New single nucleotide deletion in the SMPD1 gene causes Niemann pick disease type a in a child from Southwest Iran: a case report. Iran J Pediatr. 2013;23(2):233–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Irun P, Mallen M, Dominguez C, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Alvarez-Sala LA, Arslan N, et al. Identification of seven novel SMPD1 mutations causing Niemann-pick disease types A and B. Clin Genet. 2013;84(4):356–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hashemian S, Eshraghi P, Dilaver N, Galehdari H, Shalbafan B, Vakili R, et al. Niemann-pick diseases: the largest Iranian cohort with genetic analysis. Iran J Child Neurol. 2019;13(2):155–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang H, Wang Y, Gong Z, Li X, Qiu W, Han L, et al. Identification of a distinct mutation spectrum in the SMPD1 gene of Chinese patients with acid sphingomyelinase-deficient Niemann-pick disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1172-8-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Rodriguez-Pascau L, Gort L, Schuchman EH, Vilageliu L, Grinberg D, Chabas A. Identification and characterization of SMPD1 mutations causing Niemann-pick types A and B in Spanish patients. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(7):1117–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pittis MG, Ricci V, Guerci VI, Marcais C, Ciana G, Dardis A, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase: identification of nine novel mutations among Italian Niemann pick type B patients and characterization of in vivo functional in-frame start codon. Hum Mutat. 2004;24(2):186–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.9263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sikora J, Pavlu-Pereira H, Elleder M, Roelofs H, Wevers RA. Seven novel acid sphingomyelinase gene mutations in Niemann-pick type a and B patients. Ann Hum Genet. 2003;67(Pt 1):63–70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-1809.2003.00009.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cao J, O’Day DR, Pliner HA, Kingsley PD, Deng M, Daza RM, et al. A human cell atlas of fetal gene expression. Science. 2020;370(6518):eaba7721. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba7721.

  39. Carlyle BC, Kitchen RR, Kanyo JE, Voss EZ, Pletikos M, Sousa AMM, et al. A multiregional proteomic survey of the postnatal human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20(12):1787–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0011-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kushner IK, Clair G, Purvine SO, Lee J-Y, Adkins JN, Payne SH. Individual variability of protein expression in human tissues. J Proteome Res. 2018;17(11):3914–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Edelmann B, Bertsch U, Tchikov V, Winoto-Morbach S, Perrotta C, Jakob M, et al. Caspase-8 and caspase-7 sequentially mediate proteolytic activation of acid sphingomyelinase in TNF-R1 receptosomes. EMBO J. 2011;30(2):379–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jenkins RW, Canals D, Idkowiak-Baldys J, Simbari F, Roddy P, Perry DM, et al. Regulated secretion of acid sphingomyelinase: implications for selectivity of ceramide formation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(46):35706–18. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.125609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zeidan YH, Hannun YA. Activation of acid sphingomyelinase by protein kinase Cdelta-mediated phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(15):11549–61. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M609424200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jenkins RW, Idkowiak-Baldys J, Simbari F, Canals D, Roddy P, Riner CD, et al. A novel mechanism of lysosomal acid sphingomyelinase maturation: requirement for carboxyl-terminal proteolytic processing. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(5):3777–88. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.155234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hurwitz R, Ferlinz K, Vielhaber G, Moczall H, Sandhoff K. Processing of human acid sphingomyelinase in normal and I-cell fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(7):5440–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grassmé H, Gulbins E, Brenner B, Ferlinz K, Sandhoff K, Harzer K, et al. Acidic sphingomyelinase mediates entry of N. gonorrhoeae into nonphagocytic cells. Cell. 1997;91(5):605–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80448-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yuan Y, Li H, Pu W, Chen L, Guo D, Jiang H, et al. Cancer metabolism and tumor microenvironment: fostering each other? Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65(2):236–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-1999-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Oninla VO, Breiden B, Babalola JO, Sandhoff K. Acid sphingomyelinase activity is regulated by membrane lipids and facilitates cholesterol transfer by NPC2. J Lipid Res. 2014;55(12):2606–19. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M054528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mihaylova V, Hantke J, Sinigerska I, Cherninkova S, Raicheva M, Bouwer S, et al. Highly variable neural involvement in sphingomyelinase-deficient Niemann–pick disease caused by an ancestral gypsy mutation. Brain. 2007;130(4):1050–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dardis A, Zampieri S, Filocamo M, Burlina A, Bembi B, Gabriela PM. Functional in vitro characterization of 14 SMPD1 mutations identified in Italian patients affected by Niemann pick type B disease. Hum Mutat. 2005;26(2):164. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.9353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Boustany R-M, Al-Shareef I, El-Haddad S. Chapter 104 - Sphingolipid disorders and the neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses or batten disease (Wolman disease, Cholesteryl Ester storage disease, and Cerebrotendinous Xanthomatosis). In: Rimoin D, Pyeritz R, Korf B, editors. Emery and Rimoin's principles and practice of medical genetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Academic; 2013. p. 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Desnick JP, Kim J, He X, Wasserstein MP, Simonaro CM, Schuchman EH. Identification and characterization of eight novel SMPD1 mutations causing types A and B Niemann-pick disease. Mol Med. 2010;16(7–8):316–21. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2010.00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mukherjee SB, Pandey M, Kapoor S, Priya TP. Infant with type a Niemann pick disease and undetectable Niemann pick cells in bone marrow. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49(6):490–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-012-0095-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Graber D, Salvayre R, Levade T. Accurate differentiation of neuronopathic and nonneuronopathic forms of Niemann-pick disease by evaluation of the effective residual lysosomal sphingomyelinase activity in intact cells. J Neurochem. 1994;63(3):1060–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.63031060.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ding Y, Li X, Liu Y, Hua Y, Song J, Wang L, et al. Seven novel mutations of the SMPD1 gene in four Chinese patients with Niemann-pick disease type a and prenatal diagnosis for four fetuses. Eur J Med Genet. 2016;59(4):263–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2015.11.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Al-Eitan L, Alqa'qa K, Amayreh W, Aljamal H, Khasawneh R, Al-Zoubi B, et al. Novel mutations in the SMPD1 gene in Jordanian children with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (Niemann-pick types A and B). Gene. 2020;747:144683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Pavlů-Pereira H, Asfaw B, Poupctová H, Ledvinová J, Sikora J, Vanier MT, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. Phenotype variability with prevalence of intermediate phenotype in a series of twenty-five Czech and Slovak patients. A multi-approach study. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;28(2):203–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10545-005-5671-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. McGovern MM, Dionisi-Vici C, Giugliani R, Hwu P, Lidove O, Lukacs Z, et al. Consensus recommendation for a diagnostic guideline for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. Genet Med. 2017;19(9):967–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lipinski P, Kuchar L, Zakharova EY, Baydakova GV, Lugowska A, Tylki-Szymanska A. Chronic visceral acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (Niemann-pick disease type B) in 16 polish patients: long-term follow-up. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-019-1029-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Ricci V, Stroppiano M, Corsolini F, Di Rocco M, Parenti G, Regis S, et al. Screening of 25 Italian patients with Niemann-pick a reveals fourteen new mutations, one common and thirteen private, in SMPD1. Hum Mutat. 2004;24(1):105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zampieri S, Filocamo M, Pianta A, Lualdi S, Gort L, Coll MJ, et al. SMPD1 mutation update: database and comprehensive analysis of published and novel variants. Hum Mutat. 2016;37(2):139–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fernández-Burriel M, Peña L, Ramos JC, Cabrera JC, Marti M, Rodríguez-Quiñones F, et al. The R608del mutation in the acid sphingomyelinase gene (SMPD1) is the most prevalent among patients from gran Canaria Island with Niemann-pick disease type B. Clin Genet. 2003;63(3):235–6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00025.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu J, Li J, Wang H, Yan J. Application of deep learning in genomics. Sci China (Life Sciences). 2020;v.63(12):92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ponting CP. Acid sphingomyelinase possesses a domain homologous to its activator proteins: saposins B and D. Protein Sci. 1994;3(2):359–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560030219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Munford RS, Sheppard PO, O'Hara PJ. Saposin-like proteins (SAPLIP) carry out diverse functions on a common backbone structure. J Lipid Res. 1995;36(8):1653–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hollak CE, de Sonnaville ES, Cassiman D, Linthorst GE, Groener JE, Morava E, et al. Acid sphingomyelinase (Asm) deficiency patients in the Netherlands and Belgium: disease spectrum and natural course in attenuated patients. Mol Genet Metab. 2012;107(3):526–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.06.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Huang L, Khusnutdinova A, Nocek B, Brown G, Xu X, Cui H, et al. A family of metal-dependent phosphatases implicated in metabolite damage-control. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12(8):621–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Thurberg BL. Autopsy pathology of infantile neurovisceral ASMD (Niemann-pick disease type a): Clinicopathologic correlations of a case report. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2020;24:100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2020.100626.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Grafft CA, Fervenza FC, Semret MH, Orloff S, Sethi S. Renal involvement in Neimann-pick disease. NDT Plus. 2009;2(6):448–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndtplus/sfp101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Jerbi M, Sayhi M, Gaied H, Hedri H, Aoudia R, Goucha R, et al. Renal Thrombotique microangiopathy: an unusual renal involvement in Niemann-pick disease type B. Clinical Case Rep. 2020;8(12):3315–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.3408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Li G, Li X, Zhuang S, Wang L, Zhu Y, Chen Y, et al. Gene editing and its applications in biomedicine. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65(4):660–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-2057-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Tierney AL, Nelson CA 3rd. Brain development and the role of experience in the early years. Zero Three. 2009;30(2):9–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Tirelli C, Arbustini E, Meloni F. Bilateral cystic bronchiectasis as novel phenotype of Niemann-pick disease type B successfully treated with double lung transplantation. Chest. 2021;159(5):e293–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Wang H, Yi Z, Shi T. Novel loci and potential mechanisms of major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Sci China Life Sci. 2022;65(1):167–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1934-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wu SY, Wang H, Shao ZM, Jiang YZ. Triple-negative breast cancer: new treatment strategies in the era of precision medicine. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;64(3):372–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1714-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Carsana EV, Lunghi G, Prioni S, Mauri L, Loberto N, Prinetti A, et al. Massive accumulation of Sphingomyelin affects the Lysosomal and mitochondria compartments and promotes apoptosis in Niemann-pick disease type a. J Mol Neurosci. 2022;72(7):1482–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-022-02036-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang D, Eraslan B, Wieland T, Hallström B, Hopf T, Zolg DP, et al. A deep proteome and transcriptome abundance atlas of 29 healthy human tissues. Mol Syst Biol. 2019;15(2):e8503.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Papatheodorou I, Moreno P, Manning J, Fuentes AM-P, George N, Fexova S, et al. Expression atlas update: from tissues to single cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D77–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Gholami AM, Lieberenz M, Savitski MM, et al. Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509(7502):582–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Samaras P, Schmidt T, Frejno M, Gessulat S, Reinecke M, Jarzab A, et al. ProteomicsDB: a multi-omics and multi-organism resource for life science research. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D1153–D63. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Schmidt T, Samaras P, Frejno M, Gessulat S, Barnert M, Kienegger H, et al. ProteomicsDB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;46(D1):D1271–D81. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(16):e164-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics. 2012;16(5):284–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the authors of the case reports in the collection and the GTEx project, NCBI GEO, and Xena database and their contributors for these valuable public data sets.

Funding

Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (22C0389) and Hunan University of Arts and Science Research Project 22YB13 supported this work.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ruisong Wang and Ziyi Qin contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Arts and Science, 3150 Dongting Ave., Changde, 415000, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China

    Ruisong Wang, Ziyi Qin, Long Huang, Huiling Luo, Han Peng, Xinyu Zhou, Zhixiang Zhao, Mingyao Liu, Pinhong Yang & Tieliu Shi

  2. Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Arts and Science (the Maternal and Child Health Hospital), Medical college, 3150 Dongting Ave., Changde, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China, 415000

    Ruisong Wang

  3. Changde Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Biomedicine, 3150 Dongting Ave., Changde, 415000, Hunan Province, People’s Republic of China

    Mingyao Liu, Pinhong Yang & Tieliu Shi

Authors
  1. Ruisong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ziyi Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Long Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huiling Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Han Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xinyu Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhixiang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mingyao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pinhong Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tieliu Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ruisong Wang drafted the manuscript and Tieliu Shi finalized the manuscript . Mingyao Liu provided the idea of the research. Ziyi Qin, Long Huang, Huiling Luo, Han Peng, and Xinyu Zhou collected the data. Ruisong Wang analysed the clinical findings and genetic assay. Pinhong Yang and Tieliu Shi designed and supervised the study. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pinhong Yang or Tieliu Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient consent was not required because this study used public data.

Consent for publication

Patient consent was not required because this study used public data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Supplementary Table S1.

Additional file 2:

 Supplementary Table S2.

Additional file 3:

 Supplementary Table S3.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Qin, Z., Huang, L. et al. SMPD1 expression profile and mutation landscape help decipher genotype–phenotype association and precision diagnosis for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. Hereditas 160, 11 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00272-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00272-1

Keywords

Hereditas

ISSN: 1601-5223

Contact us