Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Open Access

Differences in the Neanderthal BRCA2 gene might be related to their distinctive cognitive profile

Hereditas2018155:38

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-018-0076-2

  • Received: 19 November 2018
  • Accepted: 28 November 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

The unique divergence of the BRCA2 gene in Neanderthals compared to modern humans has been hypothesized to account for a differential susceptibility to cancer. However, the role of the gene in brain development and its connection with autism suggest that these differences might be (also) related to the more encapsulated nature of the Neanderthal cognition and their (inferred) autistic-like features.

Keywords

  • BRCA2
  • Neanderthal
  • Evolution
  • Cognition
  • Autism

Main text

In their paper [1] Michalak and Kang report on three unique non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions in the Neanderthal breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) gene. According to the authors, these changes might be involved in a species-specific differential response to cancer, particularly, because one of the variants (position (2)) has been associated to two cancer types in present-day human populations. Although there are some descriptions of tumoral lesions in Neanderthals [2], there is no evidence of a differential susceptibility to cancer among them. Other reasons might account for the selection of these variants in Neanderthals. BRCA2 is known to be required for normal neurogenesis [3] and mutations in the gene have been associated to intellectual disability and microcephaly [4]. Interestingly enough, two de novo missense mutations in BRCA2 have been identified in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) [5]. The parallels between the Neanderthal and the ASD brains/minds are striking (reviewed in [6]). Candidate genes for ASD are overrepresented among the genes that have changed in the human lineage [7, 8]. Additionally, introgression events from archaic hominins have been claimed to account for aspects of the diversity of genes related to neurodevelopmental disorders, including ASD [9]. Finally, experimental and biochemical data suggest that BRCA2 interacts with several proteins involved in brain function and associated to cognitive disease, specifically, TP53 [10], PARP1 [11], and FLNA [12]. TP53 exhibits a human-specific variant not found in Neanderthals [13]. PARP1 regulates the dyslexia-susceptibility gene DYX1C1 [14]. FLNA is involved in neuronal migration [15] and interacts with ITGB4 [16], a protein showing two fixed changes in humans compared to Neanderthals [17]. Overall, this evidence suggests that the reported changes in the Neanderthal BRCA2 gene might have been (also) selected because of its impact on cognition, plausibly accounting for some of the differences between Neanderthal and human cognitive abilities.

Abbreviations

ASD: 

autism spectrum disorder

BRCA2: 

breast cancer 2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Preparation of this work was supported by funds from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (grant number FFI2016–78034-C2–2-P [AEI/FEDER,UE]).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author’s contributions

ABB conceived and wrote the paper.

Author’s information

ABB is associate professor of Linguistics at the University of Seville. His current research is focused on language disorders and language evolution.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declare that he/she has no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Spanish, Linguistics, and Theory of Literature (Linguistics), University of Seville, Seville, Spain

References

  1. Michalak P, Kang L. Unique divergence of the breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) gene in Neanderthals. Hereditas. 2018;155:34.Google Scholar
  2. Colella G, Cappabianca S, Gerardi G, Mallegni F. Homo neanderthalensis; first documented benign intraosseous tumor in maxillofacial skeleton. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):373–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Frappart PO, Lee Y, Lamont J, McKinnon PJ. BRCA2 is required for neurogenesis and suppression of medulloblastoma. EMBO J. 2007;26(11):2732–42.Google Scholar
  4. Rump P, Jazayeri O, van Dijk-Bos KK, Johansson LF, van Essen AJ, Verheij JB, et al. Whole-exome sequencing is a powerful approach for establishing the etiological diagnosis in patients with intellectual disability and microcephaly. BMC Med Genet. 2016;9:7.Google Scholar
  5. Neale BM, Kou Y, Liu L, Ma'ayan A, Samocha KE, Sabo A, et al. Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature. 2012;485(7397):242–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Benítez-Burraco A, Murphy E. The oscillopatic nature of language deficits in autism: from genes to language evolution. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Polimanti R, Gelernter J. Widespread signatures of positive selection in common risk alleles associated to autism spectrum disorder. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(2):e1006618.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Doan RN, Bae BI, Cubelos B, Chang C, Hossain AA, Al-Saad S, et al. Mutations in human accelerated regions disrupt cognition and social behavior. Cell. 2016;167(2):341–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mozzi A, Forni D, Cagliani R, Pozzoli U, Clerici M, Sironi M. Distinct selective forces and Neanderthal introgression shaped genetic diversity at genes involved in neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6116.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Marmorstein LY, Ouchi T, Aaronson SA. The BRCA2 gene product functionally interacts with p53 and RAD51. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(23):13869–74.Google Scholar
  11. Wang J, Bian C, Li J, Couch FJ, Wu K, Zhao RC. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 down-regulates BRCA2 expression through the BRCA2 promoter. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(52):36249–56.Google Scholar
  12. Yuan Y, Shen Z. Interaction with BRCA2 suggests a role for filamin-1 (hsFLNa) in DNA damage response. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(51):48318–24.Google Scholar
  13. Dd P, Paixão-Côrtes VR, Hainaut P, Bortolini MC, Ashton-Prolla P. The TP53 fertility network. Genet Mol Biol. 2012;35:939–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tapia-Páez I, Tammimies K, Massinen S, Roy AL, Kere J. The complex of TFII-I, PARP1, and SFPQ proteins regulates the DYX1C1 gene implicated in neuronal migration and dyslexia. FASEB J. 2008;22:3001–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox JW, Lamperti ED, Eksioglu YZ, Hong SE, Feng Y, Graham DA, et al. Mutations in filamin 1 prevent migration of cerebral cortical neurons in human periventricular heterotopia. Neuron. 1998;21:1315–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Travis MA, van der Flier A, Kammerer RA, Mould AP, Sonnenberg A, Humphries MJ. Interaction of filamin a with the integrin beta 7 cytoplasmic domain: role of alternative splicing and phosphorylation. FEBS Lett. 2004;569:185–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pääbo S. The human condition: a molecular approach. Cell. 2014;157:216–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement